Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 200 - 217)

THURSDAY 16 MARCH 2000

MR BRIAN LAKE AND MR DAVID ALEXANDER

  200. One of the best ways of conserving a lot of this material is to ensure that it is never handled. Would that be right? Therefore, it would be best if people can read it in some other form so they do not have to physically handle it. Very rare material inevitably is damaged. Every time someone picks up a book, there is some limited damage, even if it is just the sweat on the outside of the book.
  (Mr Lake) There is a case for this with some books, where conservation and value outweigh picking them up and using them, which is the way that books should be read.
  (Mr Alexander) Books are valued for their information and also as themselves. If people are only interested in information, then bring on the days of digitalisation. The object itself will be increasingly valued because people will look at books from all kinds of different angles. Historic books were only the beginnings of the study, for example, of publishing and awareness of historic printing. Very little study has been done, for example, about the history of individual publishing houses or even the printing works. They are a very important part of the history of the book in Britain. My evidence relates to the disposal of great collections of books which has been happening with people hardly being aware of it over the last few years. I think this will be very much regretted in the future when people want to study the book as a cultural object in its own right. They will find that the books are not there to be studied.

  201. My view is that a book is basically a source of information. That is its major use. If it is an object, it can be in a glass case in such a way that you do not have to handle it, or you can digitalise that as well. Do you think your view of the British Library has been very largely based around books and readership and your readers? It is a very elitist view of the use of a library which is of course paid for by all the taxpayers in this country.
  (Mr Lake) I do not think it is elitist to emphasise the core importance of the British Library. It is there as a repository for as many books as they are able to keep, literally to keep them for the future. That is their basic function. Adding on the extra ability to be able to widen the scope of access is obviously important, but you must not forget the basic function of a library.

  202. What about the fact that the British Library, I gather, is now wanting to include non-book materials—in other words, electronic materials—within its remit?
  (Mr Lake) You cannot deny that, because a new medium emerges and the Library, as a conserver of up until now printed books, etc., must also conserve the new medium. It is therefore important that they should be looking at this. They have taken in the National Sound Archive recordings and it is a logical extension but it is not quite the same thing.

  203. I do not think I am suggesting that the British Library should not continue its role as a keeper of books, but a balance between spending money on accessing by new technology is going to become increasingly as important, and possibly more important, particularly for those people who do not live and work in London. For a reader living in my constituency in Glasgow to access a book at the present time in the British Library will cost him somewhere in the region of £500-£600 in terms of fares down, hotel accommodation and all the rest of it. If that book was available to him on the Internet, it is a local phone call, 20, 30 or 40p.
  (Mr Lake) I think it is a matter of resources. If you can click your fingers and add all these things on tomorrow, I think everybody would say it is wonderful but at the moment you have to say that the current state of affairs with new technology at the British Library is very much like a lot of other places, but it is much more complicated. You have various systems which are really incompatible there and you have books which should be on catalogues so that the readers will know they are there, whether it is online or in the Library, and those books somehow slip between the various computer systems that they have. I know that the Library itself wants to institute the equivalent of the old general catalogue in printed form into a new central, corporate bibliographic database, but at the moment they have not even got that right yet. If you start talking about digitalising books, which is expensive and you are talking about millions of books, something like that in terms of new technology should be got right before going down the line that you are suggesting.

  Chairman: In view of the fact that the British Library deals with this in their memorandum, I think it would be more appropriate for it to be taken up with the British Library when they come before us later in the morning.

Mrs Organ

  204. I am interested in a couple of bits of information about your readers' group. How many people are you representing in your readers' group?
  (Mr Lake) At the moment, very few.

  205. Are we talking about 3, 300, 3000?
  (Mr Lake) In terms of active people, probably about ten. I make absolutely no apologies for saying that we have been a pressure group that has tried to keep in touch with developments in the Library over the last few years in making specific points. We have had support over the years from up to 600 people.

  206. Roughly, are they young people? Are they retired people? Are they men? Are they women?
  (Mr Lake) They tend to be older readers. They were people who had a very strong relationship with the old British Library, as it was, and very much remembered the British Museum Library before that, who used the old Round Reading Room and the North Library on a regular basis. Quite a number of the people who have been involved have found it very difficult to transfer their affections to St Pancras.

  207. You said in your submission to us that you are a firm believer in the book as the best medium for continued passing on of knowledge, but from what you have said to Mr Maxton do you see the British Library, in its old form or in its present St Pancras form, as a museum or is it somewhere where there is access to this knowledge for people? Is it a repository of collected works that will add to our knowledge or is it a museum?
  (Mr Lake) In the sense that a museum conserves things and keeps them for the future, yes, there is that element to it but obviously access should be as wide as is possible within the framework of conservation. That is where the point of balance between conservation and use is. Those are decisions that have to be made every day within the library itself. Some books can be damaged by handling, in the same way as some pictures are under glass.

  208. You think it is acceptable that a small group of readers should, at the taxpayers' expense, be able to handle these books because you really love and understand them?
  (Mr Lake) I would use the analogy with the Round Reading Room as it was. Effectively, it was just a very beautiful and efficient workshop. If you are a carpenter, you need decent space in which to do your job. The Round Reading Room was for academics and people who are using books for their work and their leisure to some extent, but certainly primarily for work purposes. That is where they worked. This function is transferred to St Pancras.

  209. If we take academics that are principally working out of university libraries, the wonderful thing about university libraries is that thousands of young people who are students have access to the same materials.
  (Mr Lake) I think you will find—the British Library representatives will no doubt tell you—that the numbers of readers are increasing greatly. They certainly were increasing greatly before the move and I believe after the move have continued to do so. Students, I believe now, are welcome.

  210. You said how a book should be read and you physically picked something up and you went like that. Is it your view that material should only be read in the bound, printed form?
  (Mr Lake) No, of course not. The OED, for instance, is just coming online and there is an awful lot of information material. Britannica has gone online entirely. Stuff that needs to be looked up for information purposes.

  211. What about if I wanted to read The History of Karl Marx?
  (Mr Lake) Perhaps I am getting older than I feel but I do not think I would want to read that on the screen.

  212. You said in your evidence that you believe, from your point of view, that the appointment of a new librarian, rather than a director general who is merely a manager of library resources, is central to the future of the British Library. Do you think that Lynne Brindley, who has been announced as the chief executive from 1 July 2000, will fulfil the librarian role?
  (Mr Lake) I hope so. I have spoken to people who know her. I have tried to contact her but she has very diplomatically said that she would prefer to talk after she gets into post. The signs are there that she will be the right person for the job and has a library background. Inevitably, over the last ten years or so, the primary function of the management has been to get into St Pancras and the librarian aspects of the British Library have been put somewhat on the back foot by the physical need to move millions of books into a new place, which has not been without controversy.

  Chairman: Mr Maxton dotcom and Mrs Organ have made very important points but they are not mutually exclusive, are they? To get information online so that people all over the country can take advantage of the British Library, not a St Pancras library, is very useful indeed but at the same time I think Mrs Organ was right to use the word "museum" because it is a museum of books as well and a very precious museum of books. I do not believe for a moment that either of my colleagues was implying that this building, or some such building, should not be there with all its wonderful contents and its policy of acquisition, but they were making the point that, since this is the British Library, its contents, in so far as it is possible—and we will be exploring that with the British Library, when they come before us in a moment—should be accessible to all of the people who, as Mr Maxton says, cannot afford to come down and who want to study at midnight or something like that, which they can easily do.

Mr Maxton

  213. You do not want to be changed to the British Multimedia Resource Centre?
  (Mr Lake) No. The British Library must not try to do too many things. There are limited resources. That is why we talk about focusing.

Chairman

  214. I had the great privilege a short while ago of going to the Lebanon and visiting Byblos, after which all libraries are named.
  (Mr Alexander) Mr Maxton rather exaggerated about the costs of—

  215. Mr Maxton never exaggerates.
  (Mr Alexander) He did not mention inter-library loan which could have brought the book to his student in Glasgow. I am sure you will want to ask the British Library people about the working of that, which makes books accessible to a large number of people all over the country.

Mr Maxton

  216. But very much more slowly than, one, they have to find the book and, two, they have to transport it, whereas, just to give a small example, this report that came out yesterday about Ken Livingstone's activities. I was discussing that with my son in Glasgow as it was published here, because he was reading it on the Internet.
  (Mr Lake) As David Alexander has come with particular knowledge of books being sold from libraries, we just feel that there is a great danger both for the British Library itself and public libraries in general that there is an awful lot of jargon coming in at the front door and an awful lot of books going out the back door. We would certainly encourage you to ask the director of The Museums, Libraries and Archives Council to look at the issue of disposal of books which is being done on a very ad hoc basis by library authorities and also theft from libraries. If books are disappearing from libraries and it is not being properly monitored, the books are being sold off at below their proper price and maybe this is worth noting.

Chairman

  217. Thank you. I am grateful to you for reminding us that I have spoken on occasion in praise of busybodies and, without any personal reflection on either of yourselves, pains in the neck as well. Those are the people who get things done in this country. Thank you very much indeed.
  (Mr Lake) Could I present to the Committee a copy of a book which I picked up from my stock yesterday, The Public Library System of Great Britain, a report published during the Second World War? It opens with a very good description of the book and its importance which I would like to have seen in the British Library's report, but it was not there.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 6 April 2000