Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 10

Memorandum submitted by Mencap

  1.  Mencap welcomes the opportunity to contribute to this inquiry on behalf of the people with a learning disability and their families.

  2.  There are conventionally estimated to be some 1.2 million people in the UK with some degree of learning disability, and about 200,000 adults and children with a moderate/severe learning disability.

  3.  The educational experiences of people with mild or moderate learning disability are not radically different from those of the general population. These young people have tended not to go on to further education. People with more severe learning disability were excluded from the school system until 1971, and have only gradually gained a footing in mainstream school and further education, as well as in special schools and colleges. As many as 60 per cent of those with severe learning disability are not literate in the conventional sense.

  4.  There has been a huge change in educational practice and expectations in recent years. People written off as "ineducable" as children are now gaining (specially designed but still demanding ) Open University diplomas; and increasing numbers are leaving school and college with recognised qualifications, eg NVQ's. In particular, the ability of all children and adults to learn, irrespective of their degree of learning disability, and the ability of individuals to surprise by their progress in learning, is being acknowledged.

  5.  We are increasingly looking to open up and exploit the whole range of community learning resources, from the university campus to the mainstream primary school and the early learning group. Technology is enabling children in special schools to link up with counterparts in other countries; resources are being shared between mainstream and special schools; specialist colleges and day centres can link up with distant FE courses; virtual reality programmes can enable people to "experience" new situations in advance of going out to experience them at first hand.

  6.  In this new era of expanding horizons, the public library service can be a rich and indeed indispensable resource, particularly in the following ways:

    —  Providing an inclusive experience for children and adults with learning disabilities to share with their peer group in library-based activities such as story time, learning about local history, discovering what a library is, accessing music, having a quiet place for study where home circumstances make home study difficult;

    —  Helping the library-using community as a whole to broaden the concept of literacy—for example all children generally enjoy learning Makaton (a version of British Sign Language);

    —  Stocking age-appropriate books and other resources: teenagers with limited literacy skills do not want children's books or tapes;

    —  Computer access to learning resources and information can also help the person with significant learning disability;

    —  For those with visual impairment or who find audio tapes easier than the written word, the modern library, with its alternatives to shelves of heavy books, is invaluable;

    —  Librarians as information officers can help people with learning disabilities (and their families) find what they need, in the format appropriate to their needs; and

    —  Liaison with local special schools, special educational needs co-ordinators in mainstream schools, and sections for learning difficulties and disabilities in local FE colleges, education outreach services, and day centres, can enable the libraries to contribute to Lifelong Learning for all sectors of the community.

  7.  We recommend that:

    —  Libraries should undertake access audits in conjunction with local learning and other disability groups—recognising that for those with learning disabilities staff training and accessible materials are commonly more important than physical access;

    —  Local partners in school, college and Lifelong Learning should involve libraries in their work on (multi-media) learning;

    —  Libraries should review their stocks of age appropriate literacy materials, eg Bag Books and should share in encouraging the development of more such material;

    —  Recognising the learning needs of family carers and of staff who often have to fund their own learning programmes, libraries should explore with local voluntary and professional groups how they can help by stocking relevant information and texts; and

    —  There is a public educational role in mounting exhibitions featuring the achievements of people with learning disability—eg in art, drama, dancing, sport, etc.

  8.  We annex some recent Mencap material which is relevant to the Committee's inquiry[11].

January 2000


11   Not printed. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 24 May 2000