Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 14

Memorandum submitted by the Publishers Association

BOOKS FOR PUBLIC LIBRARIES

A Statement Issued by the Book Trust on behalf of the National Book Committee

  Questioned on public library book expenditure by Dr Howard Stoate, Member of Parliament for Dartford, in the House of Commons on 26 July 1999, the Minister for the Arts, Alan Howarth, stated that such expenditure had fallen from £83.4 million in 1996-97 to an estimate of £77.5 million in 1998-99, a decline of nearly £6 million. He added that there had been a "very destructive squeeze" on this area of public library expenditure over recent years and pointed to library authorities' statutory responsibility to provide a comprehensive and efficient library service and the Government's determination that they should do so.

  These concerns were also reflected in the statement by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, Chris Smith, in his response to the Comprehensive Spending Review. Here he affirmed that the improvement of public library book provision would be a key priority for his Department. He initially suggested "opening up a new stream under the Heritage Lottery Fund" which "would help libraries to renew their supply of books and materials as a one-off exercise following a substantial period of neglect." Speaking to the Bookseller, Mr Smith said "This is an area of need we have identified and that we want to try and do something about."

  Following a consultation exercise, the Government decided that it was not possible to assist public libraries via this channel. It was not seen as suitable to use the Heritage Lottery Fund to repair deficiencies in what should be areas of adequate ongoing expenditure and it was thought that such a policy might be seen as rewarding failure.

  The "very destructive squeeze" on public library book spending remains a matter of deep concern to the National Book Committee. Although the first course proposed to remedy the situation has had to be abandoned, we would wish to continue to urge the Government to take all steps within its power to arrest the alarming decline in expenditure and to enhance public library book stocks.

A SUBSTANTIAL PERIOD OF NEGLECT

  Figures produced by the Library and Information Services Unit at Loughborough University provide ample evidence of the "substantial period of neglect" of public library book funds cited by Ministers. In a recent publication, Perspectives of Public Library Use 2: 1999, expenditure per capita on public library books is shown to have fallen in real terms from £2.27 in 1986-87 to £1.75 in 1996-97, or by 23 per cent. Indications for 1998-99 and 1999-2000 are that there will be little or no improvement on this performance (Public Library Materials Fund and Budget Survey 1998-2000). The decline in book provision is recognised and regretted by those who use the libraries. High levels of dissatisfaction are recorded over "the range of books and other items of stock."

  While some library authorities have managed to increase their expenditure significantly, others have made substantial cuts, even those whose expenditure was already very low, such as Barnsley and the Vale of Glamorgan. Those who were spending around the average (Aberdeen, Bedfordshire, Caerphilly, Comhairle, Nan Eilean Siar, Hampshire, Kingston-upon-Hull, Midlothian, North Lanarkshire, North Lincolnshire, Rotherham, South Lanarkshire) have seen their position heavily eroded, and there are also discomforting declines in authorities that previously spent at a higher level like Bournemouth, Bromley, Redcar and Cleveland, Southampton and Walsall. "Substantial cuts" are here defined as those that amount to 15 per cent or over in two years, but cuts in individual authorities in one year can exceed 20, 30, 40 or even 50 per cent.

STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC LIBRARY BOOK SPENDING

  The situation is clearly unsatisfactory, and the Secretary of State recognises this. He has therefore made the welcome announcement this year that the Government aims to publish proposed standards for public libraries in the spring of the year 2000, and that these will include the amount of new books and other materials to be purchased annually. The circular outlining this development draws attention to the requirement placed on local authorities to provide a "comprehensive and efficient library service" and makes clear the Government's intention of defining what local library users can expect, and what local authorities must provide in order to comply with the law.

  Announcing the proposals, Chris Smith described each library as a "street-corner university" with a vital place at the heart of its community. He stated that a new set of standards would allow councils to plan for the future knowing that they will be meeting their statutory duties, would reassure library users that they will receive the service to which they are entitled and would assist him in carrying out his duty to oversee the public library service.

  In what we must hope to be an earnest of positive things to come, the DCMS/Wolfson Trust Fund is providing £3 million for reader development and £1 million for history collections, both of which will allow for the purchase of books.

WHAT SHOULD BE DONE

  The National Book Committee believes that it will be vital in the context of the setting of these standards that the exercise does lead to an enhancement of book provision in public libraries. At the very least, the aim should be to regain the levels of spending that prevailed 20 years ago. Careful attention should be paid to the study of current public library acquisitions and to the levels of expenditure that are actually required to provide people with the books and information they need. Details can be received from public libraries of those publications that they cannot purchase at present to the detriment of the service to their readers. Organisations such as the newly-formed Museums, Libraries and Archives Council will be able to play a central role in encouraging this process.

  When the standards have been established, it will be very helpful if the Secretary of State can give strong consideration to allocating any available funds to public libraries specifically to boost their book stocks and not to be substituted for existing expenditure. To avoid rewarding failure, sums could be passed to the library authorities on a broadly equal basis as has been the case with the Department for Education and Employment's book grants to schools. Such grants could perhaps be made conditional on meeting the new DCMS standards for expenditure on books to discourage local authorities from cutting library book funds to off-set the grants. Through initiatives of this kind, it should be possible to solve the problem of shortages in book provision which has plagued the public library service for too long.

PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND THE FUTURE

  In announcing his plans for standards, the Secretary of State also made reference to the crucial role which libraries can undertake in providing access to the new technology to people who would otherwise be denied it, a theme previously explored in some depth by the Prime Minister, Tony Blair. The National Book Committee endorses and supports very strongly the Government's aim of creating a public libraries' information technology network as set out in its response to the report of the Library and Information Commission on New Library: The People's Network. The Government intends to spend £270 million over four years on this development, with a considerable proportion of this sum going towards the provision of quality content materials. Organisations represented on the National Book Committee are at present working and co-operating on plans for the network to be facilitated and for libraries to receive electronic publications of the standard at present delivered via the printed word. The public libraries of the future will use new technology hand in hand with the printed word in delivering information to the people.

READ ON . . .

  The Secretary of State also makes it clear that "the Government expects books and the printed word to remain at the core of the public library service". Experience in university libraries with the Joint Academic Network and in the book trade with the development of Internet bookshops indicate that the sourcing of information on electronic networks increases the demand for books and other printed materials. The novelist Umberto Eco admitted in 1995 that he sometimes spent up to 12 hours in front of a computer but said: "Books will remain indispensable not only for literature, but for any circumstance in which one needs to read carefully, to receive information and also to speculate about it. To read a computer screen is not the same as to read a book." The National Year of Reading has been successfully completed, but the National Campaign for Reading continues under the slogan Read On. While deficiencies in public library expenditure each year on books are currently probably running at around £25 million, the National Book Committee must welcome the initiatives being taken by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and express the hope that the important task of improving book provision in public libraries is seen, as resources allow, as a continuing commitment over the period of this Government.

  The National Book Committee represents all those concerned with the place of books in society: readers, authors, publishers of books and journals, new and antiquarian booksellers, literary agents and librarians.

January 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 24 May 2000