Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 594 - 599)

THURSDAY 8 JUNE 2000

MR GRAHAM C GREENE CBE, DR ROBERT ANDERSON AND MR VIVIAN DAVIES

  Chairman: Gentlemen, I would like to welcome you here today. I am going to make an announcement which I hoped I would never have to make but in view of experience at a meeting earlier this week I will have to make it. Will anybody with a mobile phone please make sure it is switched off because if it is not switched off and erupts during our session I shall have no hesitation in ejecting the person responsible. We are coming now to the end of this inquiry. We are delighted to have you here today and we are delighted to have Mr Dassin here again in the public session following the evidence that he and the Greek Foreign Minister gave. This is a notable day in the history of antiquities and art, since we now know that Michelangelo's David had a squint. I will call on Mr Fearn to open the questioning.

Mr Fearn

  594. You state—and I have read through what you said—that your policy on acquisitions is in accordance with the 1970 UNESCO Convention. If you were required to look at an object, or if you acquired it, which transpired later to have been illegally exported from its country of origin since 1970, would you return it or would you look into the legal title of it?
  (Dr Anderson) First of all, we would look very carefully into the facts which were presented to us obviously to check them, to make quite sure that what was said about that object was in fact true. If the object had been acquired within the statute of limitations, we would certainly consider the possibility of returning that object. We have returned objects, not from abroad, but objects which have been stolen from this country, within that period in recent years.

  595. You say you would consider returning it. Why would you not just return it?
  (Dr Anderson) What I mean by that is that we would go through the process of presenting all the evidence to the Board of Trustees and the Trustees would take a decision based on the evidence the staff of the Museum provided.

  596. How many objects in the last 12 months have you returned?
  (Dr Anderson) None.

  597. How many investigations have there been in the last 12 months?
  (Dr Anderson) A foreign object which we acquire and which turns out to be stolen or illegally excavated in recent years is a very, very rare thing. We try to do our homework beforehand rather than be landed with something that we do not want to have in our collection.

  598. Do you communicate with the country of origin or do you go through Scotland Yard or Interpol?
  (Dr Anderson) It depends on the circumstances. We would tend to communicate with the country of origin if it was from abroad, yes.
  (Mr Davies) We also have very close relations with the country of origin's representatives in London and also with the art and antiques squad at Scotland Yard, whom we have constant dialogue with on these issues and very close relations which are expanding and turning out to be very productive.
  (Dr Anderson) Although we have not had anything in our collection which has been returned in the last 12 months, the Department of Egyptian Antiquities represented here by Mr Davies has been involved in the return of objects. We have very close relations with the police and with the Egyptian Embassy, which led to a good result.
  (Mr Davies) Twice in the last five years we have been involved in investigations, one of which led to the conviction of a very serious criminal with an unprecedented sentence, which sent out a wonderful signal to the illicit trade in general. More recently, we were involved in returning the sculpted head of an important queen to Egypt as a result of a civil case in which the evidence of the British Museum contributed to securing the result.

  599. When you say you would go to certain sources or persons, are those the embassies?
  (Mr Davies) The embassy has a cultural bureau and a cultural officer. That person in that office would be the first point of contact if we felt that the investigation needed to be carried in that direction. Scotland Yard are our very first point of contact. We always need the advice of the police in these legal areas.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 28 June 2000