Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 280 - 289)

THURSDAY 29 JUNE 2000

MR GUY HANDS, MR PETER MIDDLETON, MR MIKE SWINNEY, MS BARBARA ANDERSON AND MR GWILYM JONES

  280. Their only interest is in how successful you are economically and financially?
  (Mr Hands) Not quite. We have also put into our bid some terms with regard to economic regeneration as well which effectively will mean if we do not get the regeneration with regard to the buildings delivered over a period of time we will lose some of the site. We have to perform internally and externally.

  281. Finally, Mrs Organ asked you about possible proposals to take the Dome over before the end of the year. You said you would consider something if it was put to you. Can you assure us today that none of you have had any conversations with either ministers or civil servants or members of the Millennium Commission to date about taking the Dome over?
  (Mr Hands) None at all.

  282. You have not been approached?
  (Mr Hands) We have not been approached.

Ms Ward

  283. Can I ask, first of all, have any of you ever been employed by Disney?
  (Mr Swinney) Since I would be the only likely candidate I actually take great pride in pronouncing that I have never been an employee of Disney.
  (Mr Middleton) Me too, sadly.

  284. So we start from the point where none of you has Disney in mind, I assume?
  (Mr Swinney) No.
  (Mr Middleton) No, because the Disney proposition is out of town, it is a large amount of space and it is like in Florida acres and acres and acres. They key to ours is that it is urban. It is an urban resort and the things that go into that need to be put close together. You do not have the space anywhere in an urban resort and that is the main difference. Some of the things that Disney do, like the way in which they manage to let people believe they are not in a queue when in fact they are in a queue, are absolutely skills that we will bring into running the Dome. This is not at all Dome Disney.
  (Mr Hands) Another very important difference, which I will let Mike expand on, you have to have intellectual property which is immediately recognisable to people. You cannot create a Space Mountain because you have not got space. Therefore, what you show has to be something that people can immediately relate to, such as the Beatles, such as Grimms' Fairy Tales, such as the Berlin Philharmonic. Mike, could you explain?
  (Mr Swinney) With that pronouncement about being proud of not being from Disney I would also say that we are not proposing to bring Sony, who is our parent company, also to the Dome. What we have had great success in doing is taking a full proportion of artists and artisans and crafts people and great story tellers and great dancers and great artists from around the world who have been rejected by people like the Walt Disney Company and Universal Studios because they did not start the film and bring all those works to life.
  (Mr Middleton) If I could spare Mike's blushes, Metronim has been open a year in San Francisco, it has had over 6 million visitors. The Mediage in Tokyo opened on 21 April and it has already had two and a quarter million visitors. This works.

  285. What is it that it provides that is different?
  (Mr Middleton) It is fun.

  286. What is amazing? We think about that in the context of what else is going on, particularly for paid attractions. What annoys me is the comparisons between the Dome and the Tate Modern.
  (Mr Hands) These are built for the long term, talk through Wild Things.
  (Mr Swinney) I approached Maurice Sendak about seven years ago. Maurice is this wonderful 70 year old legend who writes books for four year olds. If ever there was a guy who was 70 who is really four years old, it is Maurice Sendak. To see the look on his face when at the end of the day he sees kids crawling around on his characters, throwing blocks at each other, laughing at things which pop up and talk to you or wandering through these mazes, interacting with other kids and learning about story telling and learning about music and learning about art, I found him in tears in the middle of the place. That is what creates the difference for an urban audience. Those kinds of things which are hands-on easy to deal with, easy to understand, which not only tell stories but tell stories in the way that kids actually begin to learn and are educated.

  287. Can I ask also then about the audience you are going to look to attract, particularly with ticket prices. Can you tell me whether you think the ticket prices that the Dome has at the moment are reasonable and would be within the margins or the areas that you would consider?
  (Mr Hands) We have done a lot of testing of that. Ticket pricing is clearly an emotional issue and it is an issue you have got to get right. We need to attract the vast majority of people, we want to attract all age groups. The pricing that is there at the moment, there is no question it is an expensive day out but entertainment is reasonably expensive, going to a football match is reasonably expensive, going to Alton Towers is expensive, coming to London to go to museums is expensive. The survey results we get back is that price is not an issue, what is an issue is content. Our view is that we will continue with the pricing policy that is there. We will introduce a season ticket for people who can go more often than once which will be very, very reasonable indeed. We will continue with the Greenwich Card for local residents. We will do that without having any ongoing subsidy.

  288. You are proposing also to have hotels in the resort?
  (Mr Hands) Yes, the outside development is to put some hotels there. We think it will be completely unique, there will be nowhere else in the world where you can go to a capital city. We want to put some budget hotels and a four star hotel there. The four star hotel we want to have a conference centre in it because we think that is important to the business park as a whole and the development of the Greenwich Peninsula. Our figures allow for approximately 20 per cent, over a million visitors a year, so we will need to have accommodation.

  289. You took into account, obviously, the points made earlier by Mr Quarmby with regard to the tourist industry, particularly getting people from overseas to come here while the pound is so high. How do you think you will market that strategy for making it an international venue rather than a London and South East venue?
  (Mr Hands) There is a lot which I would like to get Peter to talk about but the one thing which is absolutely essential to us is foreign tourists, that they do not just see it as a question of going to a visitor attraction. They have to see it as going to the Dome, to also see historic Greenwich, historic Woolwich, to be able to be within 15 minutes of this building and the centre. It is a completely unique possibility there.
  (Mr Middleton) Two things. One, clearly the online strategy that we are developing is going to be very important for that because after a certain period, I hope by next March, people going to our website will be able to see what the actual content of the Dome is now and the plans for the refurbishment over a two year period. That will get some attraction. The second is that it is already very well known internationally. In Germany there is a high recognition of the existence of the Dome as an entertainment centre. I do not think that the international marketing side that you normally have, of having to get foreigners to understand that the thing exists, we do not have to do that, they know it, they are reading about it in the papers. What we have to do for them, as we have to do for the people of this country, is to show them that it is absolutely possible to create a world class entertainment centre in that fantastic structure. We have no doubt that we can do that.

  Chairman: Gentlemen and lady, thank you very much indeed. It has been extremely helpful.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 20 July 2000