Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 300 - 308)

THURSDAY 29 JUNE 2000

MR ROBERT BOURNE, MR TOM QUINN, MR JOHN PRECIOUS AND MR BRUCE WALKER

Mrs Golding

  300. I find it very interesting. It is a very big space in the Dome. How many people have you got interested already in this concept? How big would you envisage building it in the first year? How would you decide how much space you are going to take up on this?
  (Mr Bourne) The demand is immediate for space from the very large companies such as 3Com, BT and NTL. The demand is immediate from the academic community such as Imperial College and the Open University. There is an immediate demand, there is a huge under supply of space in London and the South for the small and medium sized enterprises. Right today there is a huge demand and an under supply in Central London. The Dome itself is located a very short distance from the London Heliport, just outside Canary Wharf. Communications can be brought very readily, it is a short pipe away and they can be brought very readily and make communications excellent. This is part of the problem in London, suiting these high technology companies, that even if they can find the space at those high rates in Central London they are so often 100 yards off the ring and that is the advantage of this location.

  301. I see in your projection a very small amount of this land you would project to be retail, leisure and hotels which affects many of the local people who have been trained in that. My concern, as is Mr Fearn's, is what is going to happen to them?
  (Mr Bourne) As a centre of innovation this is geographically opposite the business of Canary Wharf and it is in between the new Excel Exhibition Centre. I feel that obviously when that opens for business that will be a large employer in itself. The great opportunity here is I think the re-education and training of a workforce to participate in what we have right now, an industrial revolution going on with the new economy. There is the advantage. Obviously there will be costs of doing that and the numbers will vary accordingly.

  302. How is this going to relate to small businesses as you build them? Are you just going to build big buildings for big businesses or small ones?
  (Mr Bourne) No, a huge variety of size and a huge flexibility in actually offering the accommodation and services that a small business requires. We will be able to accommodate literally the one man incubator through to a much larger requirement by a core tenant such as 3Com who may require a much larger amount of space on a longer fixed term.

  303. Briefly, transport. Obviously you have got all these different companies working there, you will need a much bigger area for transport or bringing things in or people arriving in cars, what are your thoughts on that?
  (Mr Bourne) Parking and transportation is a big problem for businesses in a city in any event. I see there is unique communication into the Dome via the Jubilee Line, it must be the most advanced and fantastic system. The links are tremendous. No doubt in years to come there will be river crossings in addition. I think that the make up of the types of users of this high tech campus will come on the Jubilee Line and we want to look into perhaps services, river services, as well. I think the times we remain open will be constrained very much by the opening times of the Jubilee Line.

Mr Faber

  304. Obviously your proposals in content terms are wholly different from the previous people and they are wholly different from what is there at the moment. You will have to strip out what is in there. What timetable for the transfer and building work and the eventual opening have you got?
  (Mr Bourne) The demand is immediate for accommodating a number of small businesses and incubators. What we would seek to do is we would undertake the development in three phases within the Dome. Those phases would be approximately 350,000 square feet of space per phase. We imagine that will take us three to four years. As I said, the demand is immediate and there are a number of temporary buildings, they are referred to as temporary buildings outside the Zone but on the land that is the subject of the property. We would like to use those immediately to start accommodating certainly the demand from Imperial College and a number of venture capital incubators which is immediate. Although these are termed temporary buildings, this is quite luxurious accommodation and they are ideally suited. This campus could be in business and in occupation within three months of us being on site and our first phase starting.

  305. Presumably you have had discussions with those running the competition in the same way as the others have about the degree of governmental interest in you subsequently, both in terms of content and in terms of revenue sharing?
  (Mr Bourne) Yes.

  306. Can you tell us a little bit more about that? Again, on the content issue, the fact you have got this far presumably implies they are very happy with what you are proposing, obviously, but the Government or the Millennium Commission will not seek to become involved in what you do inside the Dome afterwards?
  (Mr Bourne) No.

  307. They will seek to enter into a profit sharing arrangement with you?
  (Mr Bourne) Profit sharing, if I may answer that, with a revenue stream as opposed to profit sharing.

  308. Obviously the other bidders, their revenue stream is dependent on visitor numbers and they have some idea of what has happened there already over the past year. In your case presumably it would be based not on cash flow and forecast but on rental values?
  (Mr Bourne) Our revenue stream will be a guaranteed stream regardless of the outcome.

  Chairman: Gentlemen, thank you very much indeed. I think this is the first time a Parliamentary Committee has enabled the public to hear how different bidders would use a public asset and, therefore, you have helped us to advance democracy a little bit. Thank you very much.




 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 20 July 2000