Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 2

Memorandum submitted by Glasgow Science Centre

PROJECT OUTLINE

A resume of the Glasgow Science Centre project is given in the attached document[1].The project was originally conceived and developed by the Glasgow Development Agency, a local enterprise company within the Scottish Enterprise Network. However, ownership and control has subsequently passed to the Glasgow Science Charitable Trust, a company limited by guarantee with charitable status. It is the Trust which is the recipient of Millennium Commission funding.

ROLE OF MILLENNIUM COMMISSION

  The relationship with the Millennium Commission has been quite different pre and post grant award. Prior to the award, the relationship was a little difficult and, from our perspective, this was a result of a number of factors:

    —  The insistence of the Millennium Commission that it should be the funder of last resort and the resulting clash with European Commission rules.

    —  The Commission's pre-occupation with the capital side of the project to the exclusion of revenue matters.

    —  Insufficient practical experience of "project management" amongst senior Commission staff.

    —  Major inconsistencies in the treatment of different projects across the UK.

  Since the award of grant, however, the Commission has struck a different posture and has been effective in balancing the need to be an external funder and independent arbiter with the need to work in partnership to secure a successful project.

  Monthly monitoring and administration systems appear to be working well and Commission staff have generally been helpful and timeous in their responses to specific matters arising. Payments are generally received as scheduled.

  Clearly, the Commission has encountered problems over the last couple of years with a number of major schemes. As a result, it does have a tendency to put all projects through the same hoops regardless of whether this is totally necessary. There are times when complying with these demands conflicts with the general pressure of work involved in managing a project of this complexity and timescale. A better system of delegated authority might have been worth considering.

PROJECT BUDGET

  At the time of the original application under Round 1, the application was for £41.1 million out of a total project cost of £92.3 million. The eventual award, from Round 3, was for £35.0 million out of a total project cost of £71.5 million. No additional Millennium Commission funding has been sought subsequent to the award.

  The latest capital cost and funding for the project is as follows:
£m
Millennium Commission35.0
ERDF19.7
Scottish Enterprise15.6
Private3.8
Total Cost/Funding74.1


  The rise in the capital budget from £71.5 million to £74.1 million is due to two factors:

    —  The provision of additional land by Scottish Enterprise for the car park.

    —  A pledge of £3 million received from the Wellcome Trust.

PROJECT TIMETABLE

  At the time of the Millennium Commission's in principle grant award in November 1997, it was anticipated that the project would be completed by Easter 2000. However, the protracted nature of subsequent negotiations with the European Commission regarding ERDF monies meant that final confirmation of funding was not received until December 1998. During these negotiations, it became clear that a year 2000 opening would not be possible and the decision was taken to aim for an Easter 2001 opening.

  Since formal funding approval, the project has proceeded to schedule. A phased opening has always been planned in order to maximise market impact. The Imax theatre will therefore open at the end of September 2000 whilst the main building will open at Easter 2001. There is a possibility that the Tower could be open ahead of schedule for Hogmanay 2000 and a decision on this will be taken in June. In this regard, GSC has been in discussion with Glasgow City Council and the Millennium Commission concerning possible funding for a family orientated Hogmanay event to coincide with the completion and lighting of the Tower.

LONG-TERM VIABILITY

  There are well over 500 science centres around the world and not one operates at a profit. Indeed, very few cover more than 75 per cent of their costs through earned income. In spite of this, it was made absolutely clear to GSC from the outset by all funders that no on-going revenue support would be available. Ensuring long-term viability has therefore been the most crucial and testing aspect of the project.

  Market analysis suggests that the three elements of the Centre should attract a total of 625,000 visitors per annum. The original, detailed business plan submitted to potential funders showed that, at this level, the Centre would make a trading surplus of approximately £0.5 million per annum. However, this is before exhibition renewals which are absolutely essential if the all-important repeat visits are to be secured. The Science Centre plans to spend approximately £1 million per annum on renewals, thus turning the trading surplus into a £0.5 million deficit.

  In most science centres, renewals have to be funded by sponsorship, donations and other unearned income and GSC will have an on-going fund-raising and development campaign. However, the problem with this approach is that the results cannot be guaranteed or confirmed sufficiently in advance to facilitate forward planning.

  Rather than rely entirely on future fund-raising, GSC for the outset proposed the creation of an Endowment Fund, the investment income from which would help to cover renewal costs. At the time of the initial application to funders, an £8 million Fund was proposed but the target was subsequently raised to £10 million. Depending upon interest rates, this should give a sufficient return, whilst safeguarding the capital value of the fund, to underpin the long-term viability of the Centre.

  To date, £8.5 million has been raised and a further £1.5 million is under negotiation. Scottish Enterprise has agreed to contribute £4 million from the sale of adjacent land holdings promoted by the development of the Science Centre. A further £4 million has been awarded by Glasgow City Council and £0.5 million has been raised from a charitable trust. The remaining £1.5 million is the subject of a capital leasing scheme currently being negotiated with Royal Bank Leasing.

  A Glasgow Science Centre Endowment Fund Trust has been established to control the Fund and Schroders have been appointed as Fund Managers.

June 2000


1   Not printed. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 1 August 2000