Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by The People's Lottery

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The People's Lottery welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee's inquiry into the Operation of the National Lottery.

  2.  The People's Lottery submits this evidence with the following context in mind. Firstly, the process of selecting the operator of the National Lottery licence for the period between 2001 and 2008 is still underway and has attracted considerable comment and attention. Secondly, that The People's Lottery is a bidder for operating the next licence and has not been involved in many of the aspects that an existing operator in the UK would be. Although many members of our consortium have first hand experience in other jurisdictions The People's Lottery field of expertise in these matters is covered largely by the work that we have undertaken in preparation of our bid. Consequently some of the elements that the Select Committee will be looking at are not matters about which it would be appropriate for us to comment.

THE PEOPLE'S LOTTERY

  3.  The People's Lottery is a consortium brought together under the vision of creating a fun and inclusive National Lottery that exists to improve the fabric of UK life by providing a safe leisure activity whose proceeds would benefit the community as a whole. The People's Lottery Limited will run the National Lottery with the single-minded objective of maximising the funds distributable to good causes, via the National Lottery Distribution Fund. Operating with propriety and in a socially responsible manner.

  4.  Having looked into the nature and experience of Government protected lotteries across the world it is clear that such lotteries will produce a significant surplus to their costs. Hence we believe an operator must be more than just self-financing but also must be as efficient as possible. This has two elements. Firstly that in addition to the mandatory remittance of a percentage of net revenue to the National Lottery Distribution Fund, the profits generated by the sole private monopoly operator of the National Lottery should also be applied to Good Causes rather than taken as super profits by shareholders and/or shareholding suppliers. And secondly that such a "not for profit" operator must be at least as cost effective and capable as any "profit taking" private sector alternative. There is a weight of consumer research that demonstrates that the "not for profit" approach not only enhances the reputation of the Lottery and its operator but also encourages participation in the lottery. This is why we believe that our proposal will provide for a greater return to good causes.

  5.  The People's Lottery is a company limited by guarantee established solely for the purpose of operating the National Lottery. No individual owns any shares in the operating company and therefore no individual has overall control of the company. There are seven members of the Board of the People's Lottery. The following six members of the Board will be Non-Executives, Sir Richard Branson, John Jackson, Don Cruikshank, Lord Blakenham, Caroline Marland and Henry King. In addition the Chief Executive, Simon Burridge will also sit on the Board.

  On the premise that no one supplier can provide all the systems needed to run the National Lottery, The People's Lottery has taken a "best of breed" approach in the selection of service providers and their products.

  6.  The People's Lottery system will deliver an enhanced gaming experience to the player and use flexible systems to add innovative games ensuring the National Lottery becomes a growth brand over the duration of the next licence. It will increase accessibility for players with new distribution channels and provide terminals that are robust, reliable and multi-functional. Secure computer transactions with business continuity using reliable and proven technology with a minimal risk transition from the current operator.

  7.  To meet these demanding principles, the world's leading suppliers of lottery, gaming and IT based systems and services have been brought together. The key service providers to The People's Lottery include Automated Wagering International, Compaq, Energis, Cisco Systems, Microsoft, Wincor Nixdorf, J Walter Thompson, KPMG Consulting and Serco.

  8.  Whilst some of those involved in The People's Lottery were also part of previous consortia that bid for the section 5 licence in 1994 this is a substantially different and stronger team.

  9.  The People's Lottery will ensure that the National Lottery will be organised, set up and run efficiently, with integrity, with responsibility, with credibility, with fairness, with propriety, and above all with flair and imagination. It will safeguard the interests of every participant while observing the principles of best employee practice, and corporate governance, with the principal objective of maximising the net proceeds received by the National Lottery Distribution Fund.

  10.  At all times, The People's Lottery will be committed to evaluating market response, new game concepts, technical and other advancements with a view to ensuring a flexible and responsive approach to relevant developments and opportunities. The People's Lottery Limited is a professional, target-driven business, which will continually strive for quality, efficiency and cost minimisation.

SELECTING THE OPERATOR OF THE NATIONAL LOTTERY

  11.  As the process of adjudication of the bids is currently ongoing the following observations relate to that part of the selection of the operator about which it is appropriate for us to comment. The People's Lottery would, of course, be willing to provide considered comments on the process as a supplement to this evidence. In the meantime, there are two particular observations that we would make.

  12.  Firstly, there would appear to be some defects in the drafting of the original legislation that meant that any potential applicant to run the National Lottery would not be bidding on a level playing field with the incumbent. These important provisions include obligations on the incumbent about providing full and accurate information on the retail network. They also relate to how some of the assets of the incumbents were advantageously accounted for and what the NLC owns in the case of a transfer to a new operator. The NLC considered carefully the comments from others and ourselves and dealt with these issues with some considerable skill in so far as the legislation allowed. Although this meant that they were unable to deal with some matters they did insist that the new bids would have to include introducing new terminals rather than, as we had suggested, calculating on replacement cost values.

  13.  Nevertheless it was clearly an unsatisfactory position that such defects may have discouraged potential bidders and caused some difficulty in creating a fully open and fair contest. In our view these matters should be corrected and in place for the next licence application period.

  14.  Secondly, the Commission announced on 23 August 2000 that neither of the two bidders met the statutory criteria for the award of the licence. Our examination in the light of previous precedents has led us to the opinion that our bid met the statutory criteria at that stage and was submitted on that basis.

OPERATION OF THE NATIONAL LOTTERY

  15.  The People's Lottery believes that the National Lottery should be inclusive and that its appeal should touch every adult in the UK at some time. After all, at some time or other the vast majority of people feel lucky, or dream of what they would do if they were to win. The games that the National Lottery carries under its banner are its products. Nothing can be more important to the welfare of a successful National Lottery than the portfolio of its games.

  16.  The People's Lottery has undertaken extensive research of both the player base and successful lotteries throughout the world. Our recommended games are outlined in our bid document and are designed to deal with the priorities of providing regular and large jackpots through a greater incidence of single, double and treble rollovers and increasing substantially the number of players who become millionaires (with significantly better odds of becoming so) with a plethora of smaller prizes.

  17.  The full portfolio of games that is offered to the public by the National Lottery constitutes its product. As in all market sectors, the quality of the products that are being sold is key. No marketing activity, no good cause, no underlying social responsibility, no use of new technology or refinement of player access by new or old distribution channels will sustain the National Lottery over the next licence period, if its products are not good enough.

IMPACT OF THE NATIONAL LOTTERY

  18.  We have always been conscious that a successful National Lottery would impact on charitable giving and on some other elements of consumer expenditure. The largest changes caused to charities and to patterns of charitable giving would have taken place at the beginning of the introduction of the Lottery. We do not consider that a National Lottery that would be returned to growth and is generating sales at its potential would cause a similar change to individual expenditure patterns as that experienced in 1994.

  19.  Distribution to Good Causes is not a matter for the operator although where the proceeds of the Lottery are applied certainly has an impact on the public's view of both the integrity of the Lottery and the capability of the operator. It is certainly true that, for example, the controversies associated with the funds applied to the Royal Opera House, the purchase of the Churchill Papers and the Dome have had a negative impact. Similarly the progress of UK Athletics at the Sydney Olympics has boosted confidence in the use of Lottery funds.

  20.  We believe that for the successful operation of a lottery it is important to ensure that those responsible for distribution take full and proper account of public opinion and the public mood. We are aware that both distributing bodies and Government are aware of these issues and have taken many important steps to deal with these matters.

  21.  Nevertheless our consumer research indicates that the public want the funds applied in a way that strengthens the voluntary sector and does not act as an additional pool to cover general Government expenditure. We are also aware that the uneven pattern of distribution of funds across the country causes concern to many. Additional proposals that would enhance public confidence in distribution and that would help to inform distribution bodies on the public mood and its expectations would certainly be useful.

  22.  As regards social impact the study "Gambling Behaviour in Britain" by the National Centre for Social Research (June 2000) suggests that there is not a significant problem with the prevalence of excessive play of lottery tickets and scratchcards. Nevertheless The People's Lottery acknowledges that the accessibility of the Lottery and its low price entry places a particular responsibility on the operator and is determined to fulfil its obligations with a high priority and unrelenting effort. This approach will be consistently applied across game design, marketing, the retail arrangements and the provision of information warning of the dangers of excessive play and where help can be sought.

  23.  In the case of underage play there are problems that need more concerted attention especially unlike in the case of excessive play it is not difficult to detect or define. The published figures on underage play of the lottery are very dramatic. TPL is totally committed to ensuring that every possible effort is made to ensure that distributors do not sell, wittingly or unwittingly, to someone under 16 and our contracts with retailers will reflect this. We have a series of additional proposals to deal with this including doubling retailer visits.

November 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 11 December 2000