Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 260 - 263)

THURSDAY 16 NOVEMBER 2000

MR STEVE ROBERTS, MR ROGER WITHERS AND MR RICHARD BOARDLEY

  260. With skill?
  (Mr Withers) I must admit I sent them a cheque once a year. I think we can go so far. Again with, I think, a single regulatory authority, for example, one of the things we would like to introduce is the equivalent of a Quick Pick, which is a National Lottery term. If you do not want to pick your own numbers, you tick the thing which says Quick Pick and the computer picks, in this instance, six numbers for you. In our instance it would have to be ten because you have to perm eight from ten which is all fairly complicated. Of course that really would be stretching the law just a little bit and we would then be straying across the line. A single regulatory authority and we could say "Look, we are here, yes it is a commercial organisation. We do still give substantial sums to the Foundation for Sport and the Arts and the Football Foundation. Is it worthwhile, this sort of a sensible relaxation?" I think we could come to that accommodation.

  Chairman: I think, Christopher, that if you believe that the vast number of people who used to play the pools were fully acquainted with football form then you are living in a world of great illusion.

  Mr Fraser: I did not say that, Chairman.

  Chairman: The way in which people fill in their forms can be as capricious as the votes cast for you at the General Election.

Mr Fraser

  261. I would like to have the last word, Chairman. When you read the minutes of this inquiry today, neither Mr Maxton nor Mr Kaufman are correct, mine was simply an inquiry because on the face of it it looks more complicated and there are no better people than your own constituents to give you their opinion about one system versus another, regardless of their understanding of it.
  (Mr Withers) We do have a dilemma, Chairman, in that clearly we do now have the freedom to advertise, sadly it is not commercially viable for us to do so. For example, freedom to advertise is not total. We are not allowed, again by a little quirk, to sponsor the football results at five o'clock on a Saturday. Cadbury's are allowed to sponsor Coronation Street and Daz, Emmerdale Farm, but we are not allowed to put a little banner up saying "Here are the football results sponsored by Vernons or Littlewoods and dividends this week ..." You always get the thing "dividends this week are high or low" but it is completely anonymous. If you came off the Planet Zog—

  262. Which they have.
  (Mr Withers) It is nowhere near Dorset, I must say, Chairman. If you did come off the Planet Zog the fact is that you would see these results on a Saturday afternoon and you would think "What are they talking about".

  263. Hence my point.
  (Mr Withers) We would love the freedom, Sir, to be able to sponsor those results and tell people what we are talking about.

  Mr Maxton: They would say that about football generally.

  Chairman: It does strike me as absolutely barmy when I see who sponsors what. I see Ryan Air sponsors the Sky weather forecast and they have to fly through it.

  Mr Maxton: Barbados Tourist Board does broadcast on Channel 5.

  Chairman: We must stop there. We did promise Mr Fraser the last word. Both of us have been terrible at violating that so I think we had better stop at this point. Thank you very much indeed. We will be interested to see any information you would like to give us.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 15 December 2000