Select Committee on Defence Seventh Report


THE WAY FORWARD

The US experience

93. The US has nearly 700,000 Gulf veterans and over 10 per cent of them have completed health examinations through the Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA) or the Department of Defense (DoD).[215] In financial year 1997-98 alone, $121 million was spent on research into Gulf War illnesses by the three relevant departments, DoD, VA and Health and Human Services, the vast majority being spent by DoD.[216] The work of the three departments is co-ordinated by the Persian Gulf Veterans Co-ordinating Board. The MoD has a full-time Gulf Health liaison officer based in Washington DC, who participates in the Co-ordinating Board's Research Working Group.[217] The General Accounting Office (GAO) has recently produced an assessment of the research undertaken to date.[218]

94. The situation for US veterans is not universally better than for UK veterans. Dr Rokke, himself a veteran of the Gulf conflict who suffers health problems, told us—

    We have senior officers throughout the entire military in all branches of service in the United States that are sick, but if they go for medical care and then they are identified as being sick or they go and apply for some compensation or pension, their career is over.[219]

US veterans have experienced problems in obtaining treatment because of the need first to obtain a 'line of duty' document—

    The line of duty documentation verifies that your illness, injury or sickness was caused by duty during military service ...An individual, unless he has a line of duty, cannot get care from the VA or the Department of Defense, so when they go there and they have a problem and it is Gulf War-related, first off they cannot get care and then the next thing is they cannot get adjudicated ... there are deliberate attempts to avoid providing medical assessments and medical care for individuals ... what you end up with as to the compensation or the pension is none or, if you are lucky, you have to fight all the way through the bureaucracy to get it. ... when the majority of people came back, the United States had no line of duty report prepared, so there is no way for them, first off, to get medical care, and without medical care, there is no way for them to get an assessment and without an assessment, there is no way for them to get a pension, and all that happens is they die.[220]

Unlike British Service personnel, US personnel are not entitled to seek legal liability compensation from their government.[221]

95. We have taken the opportunity during our visits to the United States to update ourselves on developments there in relation to Gulf veterans' illnesses, most recently in October 1999, when we had useful meetings with representatives of the VA and the GAO. The GAO view when we discussed the matter with them was that veterans' illnesses were likely to be immunological. This might explain why some veterans are ill and others are not, despite similar exposures, as individuals have different immunological tolerance and will react differently to the same exposures. More work could usefully be done in this area and on the possible effects of multiple exposure to many low-level factors. The GAO expressed the view that treatment and alleviation of symptoms were more of a priority than epidemiological work. The burden of proof in the US now lies with the Department of Veterans' Affairs to prove that symptoms have not resulted from service in the Gulf.

96. We were told that two compensation programmes operate in the US: any veteran can apply for compensation for service-related illness which begins during or within one year of service. A scheme unique to Gulf veterans has also been set up whereby compensation is payable for chronic illness (lasting for six months or more) resulting in 10 per cent or more disability. Levels of payment depend on the level of disability, which is assessed every two years. Veterans are eligible to join the scheme until 2001.

97. In its recent report on US research into Gulf War illnesses, the GAO commented—

    Problems identifying valid data on veterans' exposures persist, and basic questions, such as how many veterans have unexplained symptoms and whether those who have received care in VA facilities are getting better or worse, remain unanswered ... Even though significant funding has been spent on research and investigation of Gulf War veterans' illnesses, most of the research is ongoing ... little knowledge exists concerning the causes, courses, or successful treatments for Gulf War veterans' illnesses.[222]

However, useful work, both in research and treatment is in hand. A project sponsored by the Department of Health and Human Services, which began in 1997 and due to end this year, is assessing the persistence and stability of veterans' symptoms over time. The VA and DOD are recruiting volunteers for planned trials of antibiotic and exercise-behavioural treatments for veterans with unexplained symptoms, although the lack of understanding of the physical causes of symptoms means that such treatments are more likely to ameliorate symptoms rather than eliminate them.[223]


215  Ev p 87; General Accounting Office, Gulf War Illnesses: Management Actions Needed to Answer Basic Research Questions, op cit, p 1 Back

216  General Accounting Office, Gulf War Illnesses: Management Actions Needed to Answer Basic Research Questions, op cit, p 7 Back

217  Ev p 87 Back

218  Gulf War Illnesses: Management Actions Needed to Answer Basic Research Questions, op cit Back

219  Q 224 Back

220  Q 225 Back

221  Gulf Veterans' Illnesses: A New Beginning, op cit, para 65; Q 225 Back

222  General Accounting Office,Gulf War Illnesses: Management Actions Needed to Answer Basic Research Questions, op cit, pp 8 and 19 Back

223  General Accounting Office,Gulf War Illnesses: Management Actions Needed to Answer Basic Research Questions, op cit, p 15 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 11 May 2000