Select Committee on Defence Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum from the Ministry of Defence on efficiency measures for 1998-99

  I wrote to you on 19 May with supplementary notes following the Committee's evidence session with Colin Balmer, the Principal Finance Officer. In these notes the Department undertook to provide the Committee with a fuller list of the most significant efficiency measures for 1998-99, and an indication of the total number of measures contributing to the overall efficiency programme for 1998-99 and 1999-2000.

  The attached note provides this material, and should be read in conjunction with the list attached to my letter of 19 May for new efficiency measures in 1998-99.

  Ministers have announced the overall performance of the Department for efficiency in 1998-99 and have illustrated this with the information attached.

ADDITIONAL NEW EFFICIENCY MEASURES

  Total number of measures in 1998-99 is more than 1,300 and in 1999-2000 is more than 1,600, most of which are small in value. The more significant ones in 1998-99 include:

    —  Collocation of staff from Chessington and satellite offices within central HQ at Sutton Coldfield on the creation of the Defence Estates Agency led to savings of £2.1 million.

    —  A competition to supply food to the armed forces has produced savings of £1.6 million.

    —  Defence Housing Executive IT Project. The introduction of a national computer network to assist in the allocation and maintenance of all service family accommodation produced savings of over £9.6 million.

    —  Restructuring of working practices within HQ Army Training Recruitment Agency has produced savings of £4.8 million.

    —  The creation of a dedicated team to manage the works and property management programme at the Defence Secondary Care Agency has resulted in a more efficient use of resources and £1 million savings.

    —  A contractual negotiation with the supplier of surgical equipment and medical products has led to savings of £0.3 million.

    —  Income generated from commerecial exploitation of RAF Ground Training has led to annual savings of £0.5 million.

    —  A variety of utility and energy savings have been implemented across the Naval air command producing savings of £0.4 million.

    —  A further management review in the Clyde Base Review has offered up savings of £0.54 million.

    —  At the Headquarters of 3rd Brigade greater use was made by works maintenance of water and oil metering to determine actual use and requirement in each area. Consequently the more efficient use of resources has led to reduction in utility/energy bills of £0.25 million.

    —  Replacement of consultants employed on Project CAPITAL by permanent civil servants has led to savings of £1.1 million.

    —  Civilianisation of posts with Directorate of Naval Reserves organisation has produced savings of £0.27 million.

    —  The disposal by the army of various surplus land and holdings has produced £3.5 million savings.

    —  A review of a number of training functions at RAF Cosford has led to a reduction in manning level. This has produced savings of £1.5 million.

    —  Re-negotiation of IT maintenance fees and the discounts achieved for volume orders have led the Quartermaster General to achieve savings of nearly £2 million.

    —  A scrutiny of RAF Strike Command's Works and Lands Budget has offered up savings of £3 million.

    —  The PFI contract at the Defence Helicopter Flying School produced savings of £1.3 million.

    —  A re-assessment of Sky Flash rocket motor stocks by the RAF enabled the operational life to be extended, thereby saving the cost of replacements. This led to savings of £3 million.

    —  Following the cessation of operations there, RAF Ash was closed leading to savings of over £2 million.

    —  The Restructuring of the Royal Naval Supply School at HMS Raleigh has led to savings of £0.17 million.

5 August 1999


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 10 February 2000