Select Committee on Defence, Foreign Affairs, International Development and Trade And Industry Third, Second, Third, Fourth Report


VI CONCLUSION

86. There has been a widespread welcome for the Government's initiative in publishing Annual Reports on Strategic Export Controls. It has produced a new level of openness in an area of policy and administration hitherto shrouded in unnecessary secrecy. In that respect the Annual Reports are a significant breakthrough in open Government, and we join in the general welcome afforded them. Ministers will, however, be the first to accept that they are on a learning curve. We believe that our examination has identified key policy issues which need to be faced, including trafficking and brokering, licensed and joint production and end-user controls. Lessons must be learned from the history of exports to Indonesia. Agreement of the EU Code of Conduct is only the first stage. We are frankly appalled at the dilatory approach to legislating on the Scott Report. The two Annual Reports are to some extent a sign of joined up government; they have prompted joined up parliamentary scrutiny in the form of a joint inquiry by four committees. We too have been on a learning curve. We identify in our concluding paragraphs the need to examine the process of such joint scrutiny, as well as the important issue of prior scrutiny. We are unanimous in our conviction that the scope and character of strategic export licensing, which regularly arouses public and parliamentary concern, requires vigilant and thorough scrutiny.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 11 February 2000