Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence



MEMORANDUM SUBMITTED BY THE DEFENCE INDUSTRIES COUNCIL (24 MAY 2000)

  Thank you for the opportunity to input our views to the Committee as it examines the MoD's latest proposals for a public-private partnership at DERA.

  As a result of MoD's announcement on 17 April the Defence Industry has been assembling views to put into the Department by their deadline of 9 June so at this stage I can only give you indications of the issues we will be raising.

  You have already taken evidence from Baroness Symons who recorded her understanding that the DIC were supportive of this new proposal for DERA's future. For the record I attach my letter to her on this issue which underpins her comment but does indicate some key issues for which we still need detailed dialogue with the department in order to be sure that our concerns will be met.

  In addition to these there are also important and I believe quite complex issues surrounding the handling of Intellectual Property, achieving fair competition between the privatised DERA and other sources for research and the definition of "Defence Manufacturing" which is to be prohibited to NDERA. This latter question lies at the heart of whether the Defence Industry will be able to form a trusting relationship with NDERA that is essential for this new arrangement to achieve wealth creating benefit for the UK.

  Finally, we do remain very concerned that Government appears to be relying on the private sector to replace public funding of Defence Research and Technology to an extent which is frankly unrealistic.

  Industry is bound to have to focus on near to market technology investment where a clearer return is visible. Government cannot avoid taking responsibility for the longer term work if we are to sustain an adequate level of modern defence capability delivered through a smart procurement process.



Annex

Letter to the Minister for Defence Procurement from the Defence Industries Council (9 March 2000)

DERA PPP

  At the last National Defence Industries Council meeting in December, which you chaired, we discussed DERA PPP.

  Colin Balmer told that meeting that one of the options being considered was the Core Competence model with its implication that DERA would be divided between a part retained by MoD and a part put into a public private partnership. I commented that industry would broadly welcome this choice as against the other alternatives and that is still the case. We still see the following tasks as crucial to remain within MoD.

    —  Defence doctrine and scenario analysis.

    —  High level systems assessment and operational analysis.

    —  Risk assessment and management.

    —  Technology insertion and evolution strategy—planning S&T investment for both CRP and ARP.

    —  Independent and impartial assessments for equipment selection procurement and support.

    —  Control of Government to Government relationships.

  Dialogue between David Marshall and Terence Jagger has given confidence that the retained part of DERA will perform these tasks but there remain many key issues to resolve if you go forward to implementation of this model.

  Industry is very keen to support you in this as we have done with Smart Procurement and you might think it appropriate to have both a high level oversight group with industry presence and support at working level either through secondment or regular access to appropriate individuals.

  I look forward to hearing from you on how you believe we can most appropriately help this critical development.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 20 June 2000