Select Committee on Defence Eighth Special Report


SPECIAL REPORT


The Defence Committee has agreed to the following Special Report:—

GOVERNMENT OBSERVATIONS ON THE FIFTH REPORT

FROM THE COMMITTEE, SESSION 1999-2000

The Committee published its Fifth Report of Session 1999-2000, on The Defence Geographic and Imagery Intelligence Agency (HC 100), on 10 April 2000. The government's response to this report was received on 16 May 2000 and is published as an Annex to this Special Report.

ANNEX

GENERAL COMMENT

1.  The overall findings of the subject report are noted, and the Committee's qualified support for the decision to merge the Military Survey and JARIC agencies (which was achieved on 1 April 2000) is welcomed.

SPECIFIC COMMENT

2.  In respect of specific Committee comment and recommendations made in the report, the following response is provided:-

PARAGRAPH 5

3.  The Government is committed to open government and the introduction of a Freedom of Information Act. Until that Act is introduced, the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information remains the principal guide to release of Government information. This Guide sets a minimum standard for Government openness, but as a matter of policy, staff take a positive approach to the release of information and work on the presumption that all information should be made available, unless it falls into the category of information which is exempt from the commitments to the Code.

4.  In accordance with the HCDC's recommendation, and guided by the Code of Practice, the MOD has re-assessed the releasibility of evidence excluded form the HCDC report, and confirmed that, in all cases, the decision to withold this information was correct.

5.  Most of the excluded information relates to detail of Military Survey's and JARIC's cooperation arrangements with the US. Whilst the fact that the UK has a general intelligence relationship with the US is in the public domain, the detailed nature of that relationship, particularly in relation to sources of intelligence, is classified and cannot be openly disclosed. To do so, would jeopardise that relationship and could lead to those sources being denied to the UK.

PARAGRAPH 11

6.  The MOD has firmly embraced the principles of "smart" procurement and has introduced a number of radical changes to enable better, faster and cheaper equipment procurement.

7.  The need to maintain good progress in procuring the new geographic and imagery intelligence exploitation capabilities under the Modernised Digital Geographic Information System (MDS) and Phase 2 of JARIC's technology update is fully recognised as a key driver to increasing DGIA outputs and facilitating integration of processes across the new agency. This combined project was one of the first to be managed under the new procurement procedures and is progressing well. Industry is currently engaged in developing technical options to meet the requirement for a planned "Main Gate" approval in July of this year.

PARAGRAPHS 13 AND 14

8.  The problem of overstretch in both front-line and support areas was fully recognised during the MOD's Strategic Defence Review. Since then, a number of MOD initiatives, on both the service and civilian side, have been implemented to improve the situation. The main focus for shaping change in the service personnel area is to be the new Overarching Personnel Strategy, which is currently being developed. On the civilian side, clear priorities for action are also being developed under the separate Civilian Personnel Management Strategy.

9.  Within Military Survey and JARIC the report refers to certain staffing difficulties in both organisations but stresses the specific shortages and undermanning at JARIC, caused by the increasing need for 24 hour working, and the difficulty in recruiting and retaining specialist imagery analyst staff. You will wish to note that measures have been taken in the past year to resolve this problem, which include the allocation of extra funding to support 24 hour working and a successful analyst recruitment campaign which has filled most of the gaps at JARIC. The DGIA will continue to review its manpower requirements and organisational structure to ensure it is best placed to meet its mission and objectives.

10.  The report's reference to the failure of the agencies to react to resource shortages in a similar way to private sector organisations reflects the fact that neither Military Survey nor JARIC are Trading Funds, and therefore, do not have an opportunity to exercise the commercial freedoms the report suggests. Both Chief Executives, however, have fully exercised their agency flexibilities and delegations and taken a number of steps in the past to prioritise work and adjust structures to become more cost-effective and utilise resources more efficiently. In fact, this re-structuring has identified that some staff savings are achievable over the next two years, primarily at the middle management level of the specialist Mapping and Charting occupational group at Feltham and Tolworth.

PARAGRAPH 16

11.  The possibility of collocating the DGIA business units at some point in the future has not been discounted, but any decision will be based on a full investment appraisal of the options.

PARAGRAPH 20

12.  Resource Accounting and Budgeting has now been succesfully implemented across the department. The selection of JARIC as an early implementor was made on the assumption that this was a new Agency with a relatively small and discrete budget, which would prove a good test site. In hindsight, the difficulties experienced in running existing Agency accounts alongside the new system coupled with staffing problems suggest that JARIC was not the most appropriate site for this purpose.

PARAGRAPH 21

13.  The report refers to the length of time taken to reach a decision on agency merger and draws conclusions on the effectiveness of service delivery by Military Survey and JARIC. It should be stressed that early consideration of the Military Survey/JARIC relationship (Defence Costs Study 18 in October 1994) did not specifically recommend merger, but an organisational arrangement whereby Military Survey might provide certain support services to JARIC through a Service Level Agreement. Proper consideration of merger did not take place until technical and business process studies were initiated in 1997 and 1998 respectively. The final study, which did not report until October 1998, concluded that merger should be pursued to position the agency the better to meet the future needs of customers, but recognised that the full benefits from such a decision would not be fully realised until new technologies and common processes were introduced into the agency. Both Military Survey and JARIC have continued to provide exceptional support to Defence during this period and have met all of their performance Key Targets.

PARAGRAPH 23

14.  The need for the MOD to take care, prior to changing the status, or business boundaries, of an existing agency is fully understood, and decisions of this type are only taken after detailed business analysis and full consultation with customers. Both processes were rigorously followed prior to the decision to merge Military Survey and JARIC.



 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 5 July 2000