Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence



Examination of witnesses (Questions 260 - 279)

WEDNESDAY 1 NOVEMBER 2000

VICE-ADMIRAL PETER SPENCER ADC and AIR MARSHAL MALCOLM PLEDGER

  260. What percentage of that is total?
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) Those percentages are 2.9% for officers and 1.7% for ratings, so they are below the targets, but they are moving in the right direction. When you talk to the CRE, when you talk to teachers, when you talk to the parents of young black and young Asian people, you realise the degree to which this has to be based is on a long-term long-haul push. We are looking tactically at what we need to do better. As a result of not having met last year's targets we have totally reconfigured the way in which we are going about this in the Navy. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that these figures will be met, it is simply a question of when and how long it will take. We compare favourably with other sectors who are trying to take off from a very low base line to go forward, because there comes a point when you need to get a breakthrough. There comes a point when there will be a critical mass.
  (Air Marshal Pledger) Those targets are our targets, not the CRE's. They are the targets we set ourselves.

  261. You are not meeting your own targets?
  (Air Marshal Pledger) We are not meeting our own targets. The CRE acknowledge that and, again, through this partnership that we have with them, we are trying to devise methods of getting closer to those targets. We are not complacent, but they are going in the right direction. That 200,000 figure that was quoted earlier is an indication of enormous effort that is going out in the out-reach programmes that are there to communicate the purpose and the activities of the Armed Forces to these particular minorities. We are not complacent. We set ourselves very demanding targets and we are progressively getting towards them, not to our satisfaction.

  262. How much do you think that cultural attitudes, perhaps racism, perhaps just a message and impression that there is among ethnic minority people that that is the case, are deterring young people from black and Asian communities from applying?
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) It is clearly a job that I have to do to persuade parents and teachers that we will look after their young people. I think that, taken out of context, the remarks of the CRE have not made that any easier. The CRE do acknowledge the efforts which are being made in this area. If I can just say that in terms of the measures which we looked at, we track this very closely. People throughout the command chain understand the policies. There are a large number of examples where, in the chain of command, minor incidents are stopped in their tracks and people are reminded of the standards of behaviour.

Mr Hancock

  263. I think some of the misunderstanding came from what General Guthrie said about the 3% target and saying that that was an achievable target. They have rightly raised the question here last week that they could not answer, but maybe you can, Air Marshal. The situation was that the figure was not 200,000, it was 250,000 contacts had been made, but only 330 of those materialised as people that joined the Service. The question that was asked of them and they could not answer was, why was so big a target achieved in contacts, but so few realised in actual joining? That is a question we need to know the answer to. You say you have good tracking processes about what happens, but something happened between that initial contact and those people failing to deliver.
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) My earlier point remains, which is that those were not 200,000 enquiries. Those were 200,000 members of the—

  264. Contacts.
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) Many of them were parents who were not ever considering joining in the first place. They were visitors.
  (Air Marshal Pledger) These are responses to our out-reach programme—shows that we put on—taking each of the single Services' recruiting teams into environments where there are large ethnic minority communities. We deliberately go to sell the message of what the Armed Forces is about. We get a whole series of people coming to that who are never potential recruits in their own right, but they are people that we have to communicate a message to. That is the 250,000 that you keep quoting.

  265. Half that figure then, say 100,000 of them, were young people looking for a future.
  (Air Marshal Pledger) You are speculating.

  266. So are you, because you are telling us that a lot of those were parents. You cannot tell us how many were parents and how many were young people.
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) The key issue, if I may, is that I do not think we would get a very different ratio if we looked at the white people who attended careers shows. The fact is that the Armed Forces take a very small percentage of the population, and we have to put out our advertising to a very wide ranging population. When we did the Meet Your Navy Tour earlier this year, over 51,000 people visited ships, but I do not regard that as 51,000 potential applicants to join the Royal Navy.

  Mr Hood: We are not comparing like with like, so the figures we have been given are completely useless.

Mr Brazier

  267. Can I ask one question? A lot of what you are describing is very long-term, the sowing of ground and the building of relationships. I think it was you who mentioned an initiative led by one of the Bishops and a whole variety of other areas. You already have a voluntary uniform youth service in the form of the cadets, which are disproportionately located in inner cities where the bulk of the ethnic minorities live, who are very successful and in some cases are more than one quarter drawn from ethnic minorities. Why was it that in almost an hour discussion on this last time the cadets were never mentioned once? You were all here last time. It is the same panel.
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) There is no particular reason why they were not mentioned. We regard the Sea Cadets as a very valuable source of potential recruits and, equally, particularly for the Navy, which has such a narrow footprint in the nation, it is a very valuable way of the Navy appearing in the public eye in all sorts of places, albeit young children in uniform.

  268. What are you doing to build your ethnic programme on this very large number of young people who are already serving in cadet units? The Cadet Of The Year for two years running in my area, which has less than 1.5% ethnic minorities, was a West Indian lad who went on to join the Army. Does it not play any part in your ethnic recruiting at all?
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) Of course it does. We do not walk around thinking separately in our brains between, do we make different efforts for young ethnic minority Sea Cadets than we do for young white Sea Cadets? We target them all. Where positive action comes in is where we sense that somebody who comes from a particular school background may be slightly unsettled by the nature of the recruiting test, we give them some special help. We give them as fair an opportunity as possible to get through that test and go into the part of the Navy which they aspire to.

Mr Hood

  269. Surely the comparative test would be to compare the amount of black applicants and the proportion of those applicants who are recruited, and likewise with the whites, to talk about the global figure? I can remember Mr Hancock asking the question and assuming that we were talking about 20 to 25,000, and there we were alarmed to have this figure of 200,000 thrown at us.
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) In here is a figure which I can let you have in writing later, which shows for the last three years the total number of enquiries to the Navy has gone down, in absolute terms, and the total number of ethnic minority enquiries has gone up. That is a direct result of recruiting campaigns and all of the other efforts that we are taking to promote proper contact with the ethnic minorities.

  270. The figures you should go on is those applications and whether they are successful or not. Enquiries can come from a range of sources.
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) For every eight enquiries from ethnic minorities over the last two or three years, six turn into applications, and then to one entry. So that is eight, six, one. The figures for whites is six, four, one. That is still a difference, but it is actually very much closer than it was four years ago, where the disparity was much greater. We are now working on what is driving those difficulties. One of them is the fact that there is a strong difference between the support that young ethnic minority potential recruits receive from their peer group and their parents than is the case for whites. We, therefore, understand even more clearly the need that we not only have to attract the young people, but we have to win the hearts and minds of their parents, teachers, careers advisors and friends.

Mr Brazier

  271. In the east end of London where you have units that are as much as a quarter from ethnic minorities you have youngsters who spend four or five years among peers from a mixed group of backgrounds who have that support background. I have seen no evidence at all, we heard no evidence last time, and I have seen no evidence on the ground—and I have five cadets in my constituency—that this plays any part in your ethnic programme at all. It is much easier to recruit a youngster who has spent four or five years in uniform already, twice a week going along to a supportive group of people, than to take somebody off the street.
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) I agree with you, and we do have contact with the Sea Cadets. What I would say is that the Navy has detected a problem in recruiting in London compared with the other big centres where these communities are. That is a problem, because the reality is that the large majority do live in London, and that is something that we are looking at very closely. Just to correct a misunderstanding which was given. As a result of my calling on General Webb-Carter with Sir Herman Ouseley and Bob Purkiss present, I came away with a lot of useful ideas which I did actually put into practice. So the notion that there is competitiveness between the three Services that prevents that, I am afraid is just a misunderstanding and is manifestly untrue. One of the bright ideas, just as a for instance, he said to me, "Of course, you have a problem in the Navy, because it is quite hard to bring the Navy to London. I can bring vehicles out to show these young people." So now I have personally redirected the programming of the university RN unit craft, the P2000 craft, so that, in support of recruiting drives, they are available on the Thames from time to time and we can take youngsters afloat and go up and down the river and show them what it is like, albeit in miniature, to run a war ship.

Chairman

  272. The CRE were not questioning the good intentions and the goals. They were very fair, I thought. They were looking for greater implementation. They recognise the difficulties.
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) They are a ginger group and they are extremely helpful to us. They would obviously like us to proceed faster, and so would we. They have to strike the balance between being seen to be a ginger group still, as well as being a legal enforcement agency, but at the same time continuing to work in partnership with us, and that we do very successfully.

Mr Cohen

  273. You gave this figure eight, six, one. Six were applicants, but only one entered. Have you done an analysis of that?
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) We have done a very strong analysis of that. Of a large number of no-shows that we interview, people get cold feet. That is what we are following up, and we follow up every individual and say, "Would you like to think about it?" We sometimes find that they are concerned about the prospect of taking a recruiting test. We are now in the process of organising letting them have a dummy paper so that they are familiar with the format. We have actually had an independent investigation by the Defence Research Agency to detect if there is any unintentional bias in the recruiting testing, and there is nothing which they can detect. There does seem to be some difficulty, both in terms of the attitude of mind in that interim period, part of which is related to the point I raised earlier about support from the family and part of which is apprehension of taking the test, and we are working on both areas. We have driven that gap down considerably.

  Chairman: We would love to see that documentation, Admiral. It seems very interesting.

Mr Hancock

  274. If I could turn to the issue of skills shortages, ships going to sea under-manned and the gapping policy that has become very part and parcel of Service life. Can you tell us where you believe the Navy suffers most from those skills shortages? I am sure the Committee and the record ought to know what the current position is about ships at sea which are under-manned and what sort of percentage that represents, and what are you trying to do about filling those specific gaps for those recognised skill shortages that you have?
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) The skills shortages are most prevalent in the operator mechanic branch and Royal Marine general duties. The attack on that is to clearly adjust the recruiting targets and also to focus any retention schemes in order to encourage people to stay for longer. We have just put into place a retention scheme for leading seamen who are in operator mechanics and the other "source" branches, which is already showing itself to be extremely successful. This is because after about six years there does tend to be a bit of a peak when people decide that perhaps they would like to go and do something else. We actually target that period and we have got good evidence from previous schemes, including one for Royal Marines a few years ago, which, when they have got through that period they then actually find that is what they want to do any way and they stay. It is much easier to get them through that period and it is a fraction of the price of recruiting and training their replacements.

  275. What about the gapping policy and the under-manning of ships? (Vice-Admiral Spencer) The reason we gap in ships is because we have to strike a balance in people's lives. We are around 1300 short against the trained strength, and we also have some mismatches historically in some of the areas of skills. If this was a full scale war fighting occasion we would fill every boat and every submarine and every ship. If we were to do that in peace time we would actually exacerbate our retention problems because we would not be giving sailors enough shore time in order to get some balance in their lives. At the moment, over 20,000 ratings are on what we call minimum time ashore. For Able Rating that is five months between two long sea drafts. So in order to ensure that they get at least that five months we have to gap some of those at sea. We do not gap anybody in submarines because of safety reasons.

  276. Are we then overstretched commitment wise by the pressure of taking on more commitments, forcing ships, on many occasions, to stay at sea and away from home longer, causing a real problem for you to deal with?
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) It is not related to the operation directly in that sense. If a sailor is deployed away at sea he or she works jolly hard whether they are on operation or not, and the evidence points towards the fact that one of the reasons why we have sustained recruiting and retention at a period of very high employment is the fact that the younger sailors like being away at sea and like being involved in operations, particularly the sort of high profile peace keeping operations which have taken place recently. They feel good about that. What they do not feel good about, necessarily, particularly as they get a bit older, is if they spend all their time at sea and do not get any time ashore to spend life with their families, partners or children.

  277. So you do not see the Navy as being over committed and the nation asking too much of too few?
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) I see the nation asking a lot of the Navy, which is too few at the moment because we are 1300 short, but we are driving it back into balance, which we will achieve the year after next, in 2002.

  278. Can I raise an issue which is relevant to myself and Mr Viggers' area because we have a big Navy connection and we also have big defence industries? The pay differential between what a serviceman can earn in the Royal Navy and what they can earn in the civilian world living in the same area is very large indeed. Is the pay limit, to a certain extent, limiting your ability to retain the right people in the right job for the Royal Navy?
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) One would have to break that question down, because a very large percentage of sailors on leaving the Navy would actually take a pay drop. There are some exceptions, particularly for aviators, doctors, people who are skilled in communication information systems and some engineers, but they do not constitute the majority in terms of numbers.

  279. Are they the areas where you have the greatest skills shortages?
  (Vice-Admiral Spencer) The areas where I have the greatest skill shortages, at the moment, have been Operator Mechanics and Royal Marine general duties in terms of bulk. We have critical shortages in smaller numbers in terms of fixed-wing pilots and doctors, but I was answering the question as a generality across the whole population.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 1 December 2000