Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence



LETTER TO THE CHAIRMAN FROM KIRSTY DUDIN, HOUSING SPECIALIST, ARMY FAMILIES FEDERATION (27 NOVEMBER 2000)

  During the evidence being given by the three Chairs of the Service families organisations last Wednesday you invited them to submit any further concerns about matters which time had not allowed to be adequately covered in that session.

  As an observer last Wednesday I was concerned by one of your comments which seemed to indicate that you believed more money from the sale of MoD quarters in England and Wales to Annington Homes in 1996 was being spent on our homes than is actually the case. In my position as Housing Specialist for the AFF and in view of your DHE visitors this coming Wednesday I believe it important to clarify for your committee what AFF believes is the current situation about funding for the upgrade of our homes.

  In 1995 DHE took over the management of MoD quarters in England, Wales and Scotland. At that time £370 million was in DHE's long term costings for the upgrade of those quarters. When the Government sold to Annington Homes the estate in England and Wales in 1996 DHE was asked to estimate how much more money would be needed to bring the estate, including in Scotland, up to Standard One for Condition over a seven year period and, based on information about the estate that had been given to DHE by MoD the previous year, the former DHE Chief Executive deducted that an additional £100 million would be sufficient. This amount was "ring-fenced" for the upgrade work. £100 million was the equivalent of only 6 per cent of the £1.662 billion that Annington Homes paid to the Government. (What happened to the remaining 94%? There was a transfer of funding from the Treasury to MoD to pay for the annual rent to Annington Homes, but what of the rest?) This brought the total funding to £470 million, to be made available to DHE to complete the upgrade programme by autumn 2003.

  A detailed survey of the estate in 1998 revealed it to be in a worse state than previously appreciated, with DHE facing huge costs of structural and utilities improvements. An additional £112 million was requested in order to achieve the promised deadline of upgraded quarters by autumn 2003. This request was refused. Instead, the time needed to complete the upgrade slipped from 2003 to 2005. Adding insult to injury, in autumn 1999 the Government withdrew £17 million from DHE's in-year funding which led to enormous disappointment by families awaiting an imminent upgrade. Although some of that £17 million was put back disillusion had by then set in, and families lost faith in DHE's ability to produce goods. This was unfair as DHE had had a well structured upgrade programme and had had every intention of completing it on time, if given the promised funding.

  It is now generally believed that the money to upgrade our houses is not "ringfenced", that DHE has to fight its and our corner each year in competition with other departments in MoD. Forward planning for DHE seems extremely difficult to achieve with any degree of certainty as confirmation of its budget for the next year is not forthcoming until after the start of that financial year! Given these difficulties I am amazed at what DHE is managing to achieve. By the end of 2000 it will have spent £290 million on upgrades. The difference in morale for Army families when they are allocated upgraded quarters or a newly built house is astonishing . . . a shower, wow, just like a real bathroom in a civilian house! Very sadly there are many Army families who still live in substandard houses and many are now suspecting that even nine years after the sale of the quarters to Annington Homes they could still be having to live in damp cold miserable hovels with old bathrooms and falling-apart kitchens. We do not believe that the promise of Standard One for Condition, an adequate standard, can be achieved across the country for Army families accommodation by autumn 2005 unless sufficient funding is allocated absolutely and specifically for DHE well in advance, ie now!

  At the AFF Conference this May Mr Spellar did not give out any positive vibes when I asked him if he could give us a guarantee that the promised deadline for the upgrade programme of 2005 would be met. He said "We are very concerned to ensure that we get the upgrade done." How can the upgrade be done sensibly, efficiently and within the next four years without DHE being sufficiently and sensibly funded now?

  Army families need reassurance that MoD really does care for them. The signals being given out as regards funding the upgrade of our quarters to an adequate, by no means a luxurious, standard is telling us that this care is not a very deep or committed care. With the current problems with retention and the continued overstretch of our Service personnel, the last thing needed is disquiet on the home front.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2001
Prepared 16 January 2001