Select Committee on Education and Employment Second Special Report



EMPLOYER ATTITUDES AND DISCRIMINATION

Evidence of discrimination

2. It is clear that discrimination on the part of employers contributes to the disadvantage experienced by disabled people in the labour market. One of the key measures of success proposed in the Welfare Reform Green Paper was a reduction in discrimination against disabled people. We believe that there is still a long way to go before this target is met, particularly in the field of employment.

Response: The Government agrees that discrimination against disabled people persists. We are tackling discrimination in the following ways:

    • from April 2000 the Disability Rights Commission will work towards the elimination of discrimination against disabled people, and will promote equal opportunities for disabled people

    • the Government launched the "See the Person" campaign in June 1999. This will raise awareness about disability and the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) amongst employers, service providers and disabled people. The campaign includes TV and radio advertisements, posters, articles, seminars and the publication of new booklets which are being distributed through the DDA Helpline

    • proposed legislation on disability discrimination in education and training

    • will respond to the final report of the Disability Rights Task Force

We are monitoring the implementation of the DDA. Further research is now underway on cases brought under the Act. Also see para 6.

Employers' awareness and experience of disabled people

3. We recommend that the Employment Service make efforts to improve its links with employers who do not traditionally employ disabled people, and to ensure that those who advise and support disabled people in their search for work have appropriate experience, training and accreditation to enhance their credibility with employers. We believe that performance targets for the Employment Service' services to disabled people should focus not only on placements but should include measures of employer satisfaction with the quality of the services received, including services which help employers retain as well as recruit disabled people.

Response: The Government agrees that better links with employers is essential to improve job opportunities for disabled people. The Employment Service's (ES) priorities for this year include its new marketing strategy "Marketing Means Business", and a new service commitment to employers. These will make the service received by employers from the whole ES more focused on their needs. Encouraging staff from Jobcentre Services and Disability Services to work together when marketing services to employers will bring greater coherence and consistency to the way relationships are built.

Disability Employment Advisers (DEAs) receive generic training in working with employers. In addition, they have skills training in business partnerships which focuses on disability specific client advocacy and consultancy with employers. All DEAs have job specific standards to achieve, one unit of which is assisting employers to recruit, retain and develop disabled people. In addition DEAs must work towards S/NVQ Guidance Level 3.

Training for DEAs is currently under review. We have already decided to introduce a modular approach. One module will cover working with employers and promoting disabled people to them.

Pilot partnership arrangements between Abbey National and the ES Disability Service aim to improve the Disability Service's appreciation of employers' needs and expectations.

Future ES surveys of employers will include their views on the Disability Service. However a separate Disability Service survey would impose unnecessary burdens on employers.

The business case for employing disabled people, the role of legislation and persuasion

4. The business case for recruiting and retaining disabled people is a strong one, and we urge the Government to give greater emphasis to the business arguments in its campaigning, and to make greater use of examples of good practice and business-to-business communication.

Response: In October 1999 we published a new booklet "Employing Disabled People: a good practice guide for Managers and Employers" Amongst its useful advice, this guide summarises the business case. It contains good practice examples from case study research supporting the business arguments for employing people with disabilities. It is being distributed through the DDA Helpline, Federation of Small Businesses, and Institute of Personnel and Development. Officials are currently discussing the promotion of the Guide with other employer organisations, as part of the process of developing the "See the Person" campaign.

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (the DDA)

5. We recommend that the requirement to publish, in their Annual Report, information about their policies regarding disabled people, be extended to all those companies which are required to produce an Annual Report, irrespective of their number of employees.

Response: The Department of Trade and Industry is leading a review of company law, including reporting and disclosure requirements. They plan to publish a consultation document in February 2000. We will ensure the Select Committee's recommendations are taken into account in this process. The final report will be published in conjunction with a White Paper in March 2001, with legislation envisaged in the next Parliament.

6. However, it is clear that there are problems with the operation of the Act, and the Government recognises this.

Response: The Government is making progress in the implementation of civil rights for disabled people by:

    • building on the Disability Rights Task Force's (DRTF) first report, and passing The Disability Rights Commission Act which received Royal Assent in the summer of 1999. The Commission opens for business in April 2000

    • implementing the later Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) Part III rights of access in two stages. The first stage was implemented in October 1999, and the final stage is planned for 2004

    • considering our response to the DRTF's final Report published in December 1999. Some of their recommendations reflect concerns expressed by the Select Committee about the operation of the DDA. including the definition of disability. In the meantime, we have already announced that we will tackle one serious omission, the exclusion of education from disability discrimination legislation. We intend to put proposals to Parliament to remedy this serious flaw during this session of Parliament.

Concern was expressed by the Committee that legal aid is not available to disabled people to take a case to an employment tribunal. The Committee may already be aware that parties and witnesses appearing before employment tribunals can claim various expenses and other allowances to help cover a number of costs and where appropriate they can also claim:

    • the cost of a helper to accompany them to the hearing

    • the cost of specialist interpreters

    • the cost of necessary medical reports and fees for medical professionals to attend the hearing.

The Disability Rights Commission

7. We welcome the establishment of the Disability Rights Commission, which we believe is an essential step towards ensuring that disabled people are able to exercise their rights under the DDA.

Response: We appreciate the Committee's welcome of the setting up of the Disability Rights Commission (DRC), and that witnesses before the Committee were also universally in favour.

In response to the comments made by the Institute of Directors and the Confederation of British Industry, the DRC operation will be open and transparent and will keep red tape to a minimum. The DRC will be as much concerned with education and conciliation as enforcement.

The DRC and the small employer threshold

8. Whatever the practical considerations, it is difficult to justify, in principle, a situation in which someone's statutory protection from discrimination is dependent on the number of people whom their employer employs.

Response: see paragraph 9

9. We support the Government's objective of removing the small employer threshold for compliance with the DDA. We recommend that the removal of the threshold should be phased so as to allow small employers time to understand their new responsibilities, obtain appropriate advice and take the necessary action in advance of the deadline.

Response to paragraphs 8 & 9: The most effective way to tackle discrimination is for legislation to go hand-in-hand with a change in attitude and awareness. When the threshold was reviewed in 1998, a lack of knowledge and understanding of the Act and its requirements amongst small employers was revealed. We have taken the following action:

    • amended the DDA through the Disability Rights Commission Act 1999 to ensure that once the Commission is established, we will consult it about the question of changes to the threshold, along with employer and disability organisations

    • we have improved awareness of disability issues and the requirements of the DDA amongst smaller businesses. The DDA Helpline was upgraded early last year to provide advice as well as information about the Act. The "See the Person" campaign, started in June last year, is a continuation of the process. As part of this campaign, the DfEE published an employers' good practice guide in October, which is being promoted through employers' organisations such as the Federation for Small Businesses.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 9 February 2000