Select Committee on Education and Employment Sixth Report


SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Teacher quality
1
. We welcome the positive tone of the 1998-99 Annual Report (paragraph 5).

Class sizes
2
. OFSTED had not carried out an empirical study into the extent to which the investment in reducing Key Stage 1 class sizes represents value for money. We expect that OFSTED will consider carrying out such a study in due course (paragraph 7).

Supply teachers
3
. The quality of supply teachers is a matter of serious concern. We recommend that OFSTED should bring forward proposals for monitoring the quality and classroom readiness of supply teachers, in order to identify areas where improvement is needed. The next step would be to put in place a strategy to help supply teachers with weaknesses to improve their performance (paragraph 8).

Pupil and staff mobility
4
. We recommend that OFSTED should study ways in which the impact of staff mobility on pupil attainment may be monitored and evaluated (paragraph 9).

English and Information Technology
5
. We feel strongly that teachers in all subjects should be given every assistance to improve their information and communications technology skills, and that this assistance should be made equally available for part-time teachers as for full-time teachers (paragraph 11).

Funding
6
. We urge the Government to develop urgently a sound alternative to the current formula based funding mechanism (paragraph 15).

Bullying
7
. We are concerned at the relatively low priority given in the HMCI's Annual Report to the issue of bullying, and we recommend that a detailed study of the impact of bullying on pupil attainment should be included in the next Annual Report (paragraph 19).

Swimming
8
. We look forward to seeing the improved collection of data on pupil attainment in swimming, which we consider to be a key life skill (paragraph 20).

Evidence base
9
. We re-iterate the firmly held view, expressed in our Report last year on the Work of OFSTED, that it is of the highest importance that HM Chief Inspector's advice to Ministers, and his Commentary on education in print, in public lectures and elsewhere, can be backed up the inspection evidence gathered by OFSTED (paragraph 21).

10. In our view, it is essential for the improvement of educational standards that the supporting evidence for statements made in the HMCI's Annual Report should be clearly identified.
(paragraph 21).


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 16 May 2000