Select Committee on Education and Employment Minutes of Evidence


Appendix 1

Response from Peter Haley, Economic Development Officer, Chester City Council

B) how successful the official measures are at representing the spatial disparity in UK unemployment;

To reinforce the comments made in my previous letter, official measures are extremely poor at showing spatial disparity at small but nevertheless meaningful levels of unemployment. Information is needed at ward level but that as far as possible, wards should cover communities in a discrete, integral manner. For example Chester has revised its ward boundaries as a significant area of deprivation was "hidden" within two highly affluent wards, this has now been revised to create a specific ward. It is unrealistic to produce information at the next level of Enumeration District.

There is a problem with the Labour Force Survey where the use of denominators in the unemployment statistics are based upon population figures from the '91 Census. This undermines the reality on which these statistics are based upon, use of mid-census estimates would greatly alleviate this problem.

Travel to Work Areas (TTWAs) are not useful for Local Authorities and felt to be a waste of resources. This is high-lighted in their being co-terminous, (allowing direct comparisons to be made), however for each TTWA there are significant inclusions and exclusions. If they had overlapping boundaries to ensure a realistic area is defined then this makes comparisons difficult. This fact, the general need for data at a lower level and the long interval for TTWA figures being published leads to the conclusion that there is no point to publishing TTWA-based figures.

Although information is available from the New Deal, there is little dis-aggregated to a level lower than district.

D) the extent of local, national and European sponsored initiatives aimed at creating a better balance between the supply and demand for jobs at the local level whether these are sufficient;

Local to Chester, the only policies that apply are ESF Objective 3, New Deal and two SRB programmes. There are a number of other initiatives promoted in England tackling employability and employment to which Chester as a district is not eligible. A number of local communities within the district would probably be accepted.

Chester City Council has recently undertaken a Strategic Review of its SRB programmes to assess the impact they have had on local communities. The report encountered severe difficulties in gathering information at ward level due to either the data not existing or it being very difficult to obtain at this level. A copy of this report will be sent directly to the Education & Employment Committee once it is available.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 19 January 2000