Select Committee on Education and Employment Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60 - 67)

WEDNESDAY 24 NOVEMBER 1999

MR PAUL FORBES, MR MICK BURROWS, MR RICHARD COHEN, MR ERIC OSEI, AND MR PETER COPPIN.

Chairman

60.  So for example, that in recent boundary changes in Objective 2, where the most attractive industrial location from everybody's point of view just falls on the wrong side of the boundary it might actually be a disastrous decision to move that out because the grants disappear and the people living within that area can go a very short distance, but it can be moved out through boundary changes?

  (Mr  Cohen) To briefly log that, I think it is an issue about balancing needs and opportunities. We as local authorities try to do that. Bristol is subject to bidding for ESF Objective II at the moment. We are bidding for Objective II for areas of deprivation close to the centre and we would look for opportunities to make sure that people in those areas would benefit from the opportunities in the centre using Objective II and other funding programmes. All it is is another issue of flexibility.

Chairman: Thank you. Mr  Brady?

Mr  Brady

61.  I was interested in picking up on this point on cultural attitudes to travel to work and also on how far they are shared in the other areas represented. I was interested in the comment that two or three miles can seem too much. Clearly in terms of dealing with that attitudinal problem simply providing a bus service may not go any way to solving the problem. What can be done to counter the attitude and what are the other experiences on the table?

  (Mr  Burrows) Some of the things we are doing to counter that attitude is actually through intermediate labour markets. There is one vehicle to actually take people away from the community into a temporary position of employment, it then enables them to step on. Because it is not just a transport issue, it is the motivational aspect and confidence. Watching what happens to people when they are locked in their society, they have no money to go anywhere, they have no job, their position on the street is diminished. It is very different in a rural village coalfield area to the inner city. I call it the Smart thing. In a city or a city area where you have access to things there is a lot more fluidity around. When you are without in a rural area, in a pocket of isolation, you become very isolated and it is about giving people confidence to take the next step. That is just my personal view of it.

  (Mr  Forbes) I have two things to say on that. One is, I would mentioned again this afternoon the 1,086 lone parents that I referred to earlier. In the case of the Tesco partnership, Tesco are providing a bus to collect people in the area and take them to a learning centre for skills training and then to some of the stores for work placements and work experience. The other thing we have done in looking at that problem of where people are, is we have started to map the bus routes to see exactly where people can in reality get to, because although they may be going in and doing everything they can to find work, if they cannot access the transport then they have no hope of progressing. So we see that as quite productive because the different companies that deal with the transport issues are receptive at looking at re-routing.

Ms  Atherton

62.  Would you like to see far more encouragement from national government for looking in detail at a local authority level at the routes that are used by buses and trains, the integration? We were fascinated at Committee to learn that actually nobody sits down and maps transport in some authorities. It just happens through the local companies in an ad hoc manner. Do you feel this sense of frustration or do you have responsibility yourself and feel that you are having enough input? I was astonished to learn that the local authority in Cornwall had no involvement whatsoever in what routes went where.

  (Mr  Cohen) We take our transport planning seriously. I could send you a copy of the new transport plan which also focuses on issues around employment because travel-to-work is important to us as well. So that is something we certainly do.

63.  But it is not universally done?

  (Mr  Cohen) I could not speak for other local authorities on how they work.

  (Mr  Coppin) We are exploring bus quality partnerships with bus companies and have contributed to a number of rail improvement feasibility studies. We are obviously clear where the routes are.

Mr  Brady

64.  Coming back to the point I was pursuing earlier, do people for instance in Hackney have the same reticence about travel into the West End to work as you might get in a Nottinghamshire pit village? Is it a similar situation?

  (Mr  Osei) Certainly among the young, very much so and although, as I said, we are less than 15 minutes from the City and West End, in some parts of the Borough, yet a lot of the young people lack confidence to go outside their area. To deal with this problem, we have been running confidence building schemes, for example, taking a group of unemployed people on the scheme to the City of London to see how things are, to see a different perspective to a deprived inner city area. I had a provider tell me of an instance where this young person was taken to a company in the City of London and this young person actually fainted because the whole scenario was very intimidating for her. So confidence is a major issue for us and we are developing a lot of schemes which will raise the aspirations and the confidence of the young people.

  (Mr  Cohen) I would agree that motivation is an issue as well. When someone says that transport is a problem, it can be indicative of their uncertainty about travelling that distance or there are serious practicalities. As I said, in Bristol we have jobs on the north fringe of the city, we have unemployment in the south, in the inner city and never the twain shall meet at an affordable rate. It can take a long time to travel that distance as well. We are looking to introduce rapid transport systems but they will not be the be all and end all either. So there is a question of the distance people are prepared to travel for the wages that they might earn at the end of that journey.

65.  That is the end result in the context of whether there is a jobs gap in particular areas, but ultimately you get people into jobs but they go and live in the other areas where the jobs are?

  (Mr  Cohen) Yes, if the job pays well enough. Yes, that will happen. Not only because it is close to work but because they will be getting out of the area that they were living in.

Mr  Brady: Post-code discrimination from the point of view of the employee.

Chairman

66.  There are some very interesting questions which I have got at the end—my other colleagues do not have any more questions now—and it is partly because I learned a great deal in my economic development through the New Town movement in Washington thirty years ago. Leeds has a relatively good record we agreed in maintaining existing and attracting new manufacturing jobs. It is claimed that your site development is an important contributory factor so how important is property led economic development to improving the labour market conditions faced by people in deprived areas?

  (Mr  Forbes) I think that Leeds has managed that extremely well over the last 10 to 15 years and the projections of what we anticipate coming into the city are also there and well documented. There is a very close working relationship in Leeds and has been for many years between the local authority and the private sector. The Planning Department and our own Economic Development Department in the Council have also played a very prominent role. One of the things that happens in Leeds is that the Planning Department, Economic Development and Education Training always work very closely together, so when new business comes into Leeds—and the recent example I have given you is the big company, Price Costco, which came to Leeds and offered 160, 170 jobs in the first instance. Their normal recruitment was that they would have put a large advertisement in the paper and taken a hotel and done it over two or three days. One year advance, because we were aware of that through the Planing and Economic Development Departments, I met with the Price Costco people down in Watford with their directorate and put an alternative to them and that was to train local people for the jobs at Costco, the kind of people that are now progressing through the New Deal. Whilst they wanted to recruit some senior managers through the open market, they agreed with that approach and when that was put to them they said: "What will be the benefits?" and I said: "You will have a low rate of turnover. If you take local people they will stay with you, and not only will they stay with you but their sons and daughters will come and get part time jobs as well and you will create a network". One year on I had a meeting with them and they said to me that of all their stores it had the lowest turnover. So it is important that as those new jobs do come in that we are mindful of the information that we hold as a local authority and it is those people who are not part of the network that I have described, we make sure are connected into it because otherwise the jobs are filled by commuting.

  (Mr  Burrows) I think it is a mixture of the whole lot coming together which hopefully new commitment to regeneration, etcetera and RDAs will be supporting and it is about the matching of all the introductory regional planing guidance, etcetera. I know the LGAs have been doing some thinking on this. It is also, I think, not just about new businesses coming in; the biggest growth area for jobs is from existing businesses.

67.  Anyone like to add anything?

  (Mr  Cohen) I think it is important there should be an encouragement, possibly from Central Government, that inward investment functions operating in local areas should pay attention to skills and employment issues, not just the issue of land and whatever grants are available. We are now getting calls from potential inward investors and growth companies in the area, asking not just about what premises are available, what this particular site is like, but what is the skills base like and we are finding that repeatedly. As with Mr  Forbes, we get into negotiations with companies—IKEA was a recent example -to look at their local recruitment practices and to see whether or not we can make sure they focus better on areas that we are interested in and they can make a more significant impact on the local economy and avoid the commuting issue.

Chairman: Well, gentlemen, thank you very much indeed. There is a lot of expertise around the table, your side of the table. We have a bit on our side of the table too; not so much. Thank you for putting it at our disposal. I suspect we would have liked to have kept you longer, but it has all been very interesting and fascinating. Let us keep up the dialogue. Thank you.


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 19 January 2000