Annex 4
EXTRACT FROM FUTURE WATER AND SEWERAGE CHARGES
2000-05
Table 3
COMPARISON OF PRICE LIMITS: FINAL DETERMINATIONS
COMPARED WITH DRAFT DETERMINATIONS
|
Final determination1 |
Draft determination2 |
| Po in
2000-01
| Average3 K
for 2000-05
| Po in
2000-01 | Average3 K
for 2000-05
|
Water and sewerage companies |
| |
| |
Anglian | -10.0
| -0.5 | -11.1
| -1.2 |
Dwr Cymru | -10.5
| -1.9 | -13.8
| -3.0 |
North West | -9.3
| -0.5 | -9.3
| -1.9 |
Northumbrian | -19.4
| -4.6 | -25.5
| -5.6 |
Severn Trent | -14.1
| -3.2 | -14.1
| -3.2 |
South West | -12.2
| -1.4 | -13.7
| -1.6 |
Southern | -13.0
| -2.3 | -15.6
| -3.3 |
Thames | -11.7
| -2.6 | -11.7
| -2.8 |
Wessex | -12.0
| -0.9 | -13.5
| -1.9 |
Yorkshire | -14.5
| -2.9 | -15.2
| -3.4 |
WaSC average (weighted) | -12.3
| -2.0 | -13.4
| -2.7 |
Water only companies |
| |
| |
Bournemouth and West Hampshire | -3.0
| -1.0 | -3.6
| -1.5 |
Bristol | -10.0
| -2.1 | -13.5
| -3.2 |
Cambridge | -14.3
| -3.5 | -16.4
| -4.1 |
Cholderton | -8.0
| -2.7 | -15.0
| -3.2 |
Dee Valley | -10.6
| -3.9 | -15.7
| -4.4 |
Essex and Suffolk | -13.8
| -2.9 | -19.0
| -4.3 |
Folkestone and Dover | -0.0
| -2.0 | -8.5
| -0.5 |
Mid Kent | -19.7
| -4.0 | -22.3
| -5.7 |
North Surrey | -15.0
| -2.4 | -21.2
| -4.3 |
Portsmouth | -3.0
| -1.4 | -3.0
| -1.4 |
South East | -16.1
| -3.9 | -23.9
| -5.9 |
South Staffordshire | -2.7
| -1.3 | -2.7
| -2.4 |
Sutton and East Surrey | -17.0
| -5.1 | -21.7
| -6.5 |
Tendring Hundred | -6.9
| 0.0 | -8.1
| -1.7 |
Three Valleys | -15.2
| -3.2 | -16.7
| -3.6 |
York | -9.0
| -2.1 | -11.8
| -2.7 |
WoC average (weighted) | -12.4
| -2.8 | -16.2
| -3.9 |
Industry average (weighted) | -12.3
| -2.1 | -13.7
| -2.9 |
1 The annual price limits and the average price limits
are set out in Table 1 of this document.
2 The annual price limits were published in Table 1 of
Future water and sewerage charges 2000-05 Draft determinations
in July 1999.
3 The average for the price limits is the geometric average
of the annual price limits.
For North West Water and Wessex Water, the price limits are
higher than would otherwise be the case in order to accommodate
the financial constraints that result from the increased scale
and pace of the environmental programmes now required to meet
ministerial objectives. Customers of North West Water and Wessex
Water are, therefore, paying more than would otherwise be the
case to finance the additional expenditure.
May 2000
|