Select Committee on Environmental Audit Minutes of Evidence


Annex 1

Ofwat INFORMATION NOTE NO 35

SERVICEABILITY OF THE WATER AND SEWERAGE NETWORKS IN ENGLAND AND WALES


SERVICEABILITY FOR CUSTOMERS

  In 1994, Ofwat assessed the company plans for the future management and capital maintenance of the underground systems using the concept of serviceability for customers. This approach looked at the past performance of the potable water and sewerage networks in maintaining the flow of services to/from customers.

  Performance of the overall networks was examined across a range of measures to assess whether services to customers were stable, improving or deteriorating. This performance was contrasted with the records of past activity/expenditure on the infrastructure and an assessment of how efficient the company was relative to its peers in capital works. Future price limits provided for significant increases in existing levels of capital maintenance activity where there was evidence of deteriorating serviceability for customers and the company was efficient in carrying out capital works.

  The key elements of performance assessment for the potable water infrastructure are itemised below. The aggregate trend assessment of serviceability for customers, is shown in Figure 1.

Compliance Quality

  There has been an improving trend in performance in this area over the last five years. Within the distribution systems, unlined iron mains create non-compliance problems. Focused work on these mains has reduced the percentage of distribution zones where there are these types of problems (down to 24 per cent in 1994 with only 1.9 per cent of samples failing). The scale of the leeching of poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) from older lined mains has been identified, with 12 per cent of zones non-compliant in 1994.

Extent of low pressure problems (DG2)

  Assessments of the number of properties at risk from receiving unacceptably low pressure have been made for a considerable period. The position on this aspect of serviceability shows an improving trend particularly in recent years where the data is more robust.

Number of bursts disrupting services to customers

  The long term trend shows a reasonably stable position on the infrastructure with some improvements in recent times (except for 1995-96).

Scale of interruptions of supplies to customers (DG3)

  Unplanned interruptions to supplies greater than 12 hours show an improving trend in recent years (except for 1995-96).

  The view taken in 1994, based on data up to 1992-93, was that there was little reason to increase levels of infrastructure maintenance in the water service. Improvements in efficiency and more focused work resulting from better information systems should enable the companies to maintain the improving trend. Very unusual climatic condition in 1995-96 (a severe and prolonged drought and a deep freeze followed by a rapid thaw) disrupted the trend.

  The key elements of performance assessment for the sewerage infrastructure are itemised below. The aggregate trend assessment of serviceability for customers, is shown in Figure 2.

Properties flooded from sewers due to hydraulic inadequacy (DG5)

  The trend in recent times has been variable and gives a mixed picture of serviceability for customers and some evidence of a slightly worsening position to 1993-94 with recent improvements.

Number of sewer collapses

  This trend is reasonably stable.

  The view taken in 1994, based on data up to 1992-93, was that there was some cause for concern in terms of deteriorating serviceability for customers from the sewer networks. A slight but significant increase in activity was assumed in future price limits. Improvements in efficiency and more focused work arising from better information are expected to enable the companies to start to improve performance of the sewer networks.

THE UNDERGROUND ASSET STOCK

  As part of the 1994 review of price limits, companies carried out a systematic assessment of their assets (both underground and above ground). Methods and reporting requirements were standardised. The whole process was exposed to technical audit by the nominated Reporters. The studies were summarised in the companies strategic business plan submissions to Ofwat in March 1994.

  The information, together with assessments of individual company networks serviceability for customers, was used by Ofwat to set price limits for all service providers in July 1994.

  The aggregate asset stock, condition and serviceability information from the strategic business plans for potable water mains is summarised below.

POTABLE WATER MAINS—1992-93—ASSET STOCK <=300
<=600
<=900
>900
Total
Gross
bore
bore
bore
bore
stock
MEA
(km)
(km)
(km)
(km)
(km)
(£bn)
238,000
46,000
19,000
8,000
311,000
£31.6b
ASSET CONDITION
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Prop'n
40%
35%
16%
5%
4%
INDIVIDUAL ASSET SERVICEABILITY
82% fully serviceable and acceptable
18% unsatisfactory and cause for concern

Notes on Condition Grades:

Condition grade 1:  No failures, fully complies with modern standards.

Condition grade 2:  No significant failures (minimal impact on service performance), not quite consistent with modern standards.

Condition grade 3:  Deterioration beginning to be reflected in service levels or increased operating costs.

Condition grade 4:  Considerable corrosion affecting service performance, nearing end of useful life, frequent bursts.

Condition grade 5:  Substantially derelict and source of service problems, no residual life.

  The gross replacement cost of all the potable mains with modern equivalent asssets (MEA) was estimated to be over £31 billion. Around 9 per cent of the potable water pipes were found to be relatively poor condition (condition grades 4 and 5). Around 18 per cent of potable water pipes were unsatisfactory from an individual asset serviceability standpoint. Serviceability incorporates quality problems in unlined iron mains and leeching of poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) from older lined mains.

  The aggregate asset stock, condition and serviceability information from the strategic business plans for sewerage asssets are summarised below.

CRITICAL SEWERS—1992-93 <=150 bore (km)
<=300 bore (km)
<=600 bore (km)
<=900 bore (km)
>900 bore (km)
Total Stock (km)
15,000
25,000
14,800
7,500
9,400
71,700
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Gross MEA (£bn)
60%
19%
12%
7%
3%
£34.4b
INDIVIDUAL ASSET SERVICEABILITY
90% fully serviceable and acceptable
10% unsatisfactory and cause for concern
NON-CRITICAL SEWERS—1992-93 <=150 bore (km)
<=300 bore (km)
<=600 bore (km)
Total Stock (km)
113,300
79,900
30,000
223,200
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Gross MEA (£bn)
62%
18%
12%
6%
2%
£57.2b
INDIVIDUAL ASSET SERVICEABILITY
94% fully serviceable and acceptable
6% unsatisfactory and cause for concern

Notes on Condition Grades for Sewers:

Condition grade 1:  No structural defects.

Condition grade 2:  Minor cracking in brisk sewers but no deformation or loss of bricks, line and level as built; for other sewers some circumferential cracking or moderate joint defects.

Condition grade 3:  Some deformation in brick sewers, displaced bricks, occasional connection defects; for other sewers some deformation (up to 5 per cent), cracking or fractures or joint defects or minor loss of level or badly made connections.

Condition grade 4:  Deformation in brisk sewers up to 10 per cent, some brick loss or moderate loss of level or frequent badly made connections or moderate loss of level; for other sewers deformation of up to 10 per cent, cracked or fractured or serious loss of level.

Condition grade 5:  Collapsed or severely deformed sewers or missing inverts or extensive areas of missing fabric/bricks.

  The gross replacement cost of the sewers with modern equivalent assets (MEA) was estimated to be over £91 billion. Around 8 to 10 per cent of the sewers were found to be poor condition (condition grades 4 and 5).

RECENT ACTIVITY LEVELS

  The aggregate activity on the potable water network over the last six years is summarised below.

ACTIVITY ON POTABLE WATER MAINS Activity
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
Relining
1,926
2,642
2,077
2,011
2,037
1,380
Renewal
1,909
2,442
2,359
2,187
2,330
2,739
New Mains
2,564
2,808
1,953
1,787
1,809
1,635
Total Activity
6,489
7,983
6,481
6,078
6,270
5,849


  The activity includes work to improve quality compliance in addition to that necessary just to maintain serviceability for customers.

  The aggregate activity on the critical sewer network over the last five years is summarised below.

ACTIVITY ON CRITICAL SEWERS

Activity
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
Renovation
152
131
89
59
80
104
Replacement
3
165
146
111
68
76
New sewers
384
507
455
334
350
228
Total Activity
539
803
690
504
498
408


ACCOUNTING TREATMENT FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS

  In the late 1980s the water industry in England and Wales adopted renewals accounting for the very long-lived infrastructure assets. This was a move away from conventional depreciation based on assumed asset lives. The actual age of network assets has little or no impact on whether it is performing satisfactorily or is in need of routine maintenance, renovation or replacement. Renewals accounting is based on an operational assessment of activity needed to maintain the performance of the underground infrastructure over a reasonably long period (15 to 20 years)—consistent with the approach to serviceability for customers.

  An operational assessment is used by companies to estimate a reasonably long term investment need. For accounting purposes an average infrastructure renewals charge (IRC) is assumed in the annual profit and loss account.

  In 1994 Ofwat assumed IRC based on five years past investment levels and the forward projections for the 10 years of set price limits coming out of the serviceability for customers assessment.

  Annual variations between actual expenditure and the relevant IRC are carried forward in the company balance sheets either as an accrual (a liability to carry out higher levels of maintenance sometime in the future which has already been provided for) or a prepayment (ahead of the original plan and a likelihood of lower levels of maintenance sometime in the future).

FUTURE PERIODIC REVIEWS

  As a minimum, all price limit determinations provide for the maintenance of serviceability for customers. If companies do not consider the price limits are sufficient then they can appeal to the MMC. At the 1999 periodic review the performance of the networks will be reviewed. Serviceability trends covering the period 1990-91 to 1997-98 (and part of 1998-99) will be available to the Director. A second systematic review of the asset stock will also be available as at the 1997-98 base year. A decline in serviceability would be considered a serious shortfall in company performance and require rapid and effective remedies at no cost to the customers. The trend data, an assessment of the stock data and the results of comparative capital maintenance studies will provide a basis for future projections of investment needed to maintain serviceability over the next price limit period.

TERMINATION OF LICENCES

  One of the key tests of a company's stewardship is whether serviceability for customers has been maintained over the period of its licence. The 25 year licences granted in 1989 run to 2014. The respective Secretary of State, on advice from the Director, has to give 10 year notice of termination. A decision on whether to issue notice of termination or extend the licence can be taken in 2004.

  By 2004 there will be reasonably consistent serviceability trend information covering the period 1990-91 and 2003-04 (14 years data). Also there will be the results of three systematic assessments of the overall asset stock, condition and serviceability relating to the positions in 1992-93, 1997-98 and 2002-03 (periodic review base years). This data would provide a basis for the Director's recommendations to the Secretary of State.

  By 2014 the serviceability trend information will then run to 24 years and there will be five systematic assessments of the asset stock (the additional base years of 2007-08 and 2012-13). A deteriorating trend of serviceability would need to be rectified very quickly as part of any new licence at no additional cost to customers. The need for such work following the transfer of a licence would have a very serious impact on the monies paid by the new owners for the infrastructure assets of the original licensee. This represents a final and very direct incentive for the owners of the companies to ensure that their companies maintain the serviceability of the asset stock and so protect the value of their investment.

January 1997





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 14 November 2000