Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by The Institution of Civil Engineers (RT 33)

  The Institution of Civil Engineers welcomes the opportunity to assist the Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee in their investigation.

  Our detailed comments are listed below under the headings suggested on your press release of 22 July. In addition we have commented on "Effects of procurement methods of timing, quality and costs of schemes" and "Relation of light rapid transport to integrated transport plans", both of which can influence the effectiveness of LRT schemes.

A.  EXAMPLES OF RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEMS RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED

  Since 1978 there have been a total of 60 new generation light rail systems constructed around the world. Of these, six LRT systems have been built in the UK:

Tyne and Wear Metro—opened 1980 (Reference 1)
Docklands Light Railway—opened 1987 (Reference 2)
Manchester Metrolink—opened 1992 (References 3a, 3b and 3c)
South Yorkshire Supertram      —opened 1994(References 4a and 4b)
Midland Metro—due to open 1999     
Croydon Tramlink—due to open 1999 (Reference 5)


  One further system, Nottingham Express Transit, has been approved and construction is expected to begin in 1999.

    Appendix 1 contains a list of all the LRT systems introduced worldwide since 1978.

    Appendix 2 gives details of the main function of LRT systems built in the UK since 1992.

B.  PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION

  At the time of construction difficulties include:

    —  disruption to traffic, businesses and residents;

    —  lack of co-ordination with other authorities, eg statutory undertakers, planning authorities;

    —  ensuring that private sector contractors comply with specifications.

  Problems faced afterwards can include:

    —  lack of integration with bus services (except in London);

    —  changes in land use which result in reduced demand;

    —  insufficient priority on street running sections.

  All these problems should be solvable with good planning and good project management.

C.  EXAMPLES OF LRT SUCCESSFULLY REMOVING VEHICULAR TRAFFIC FROM ROADS AND POSITIVELY INFLUENCING CONGESTION

  In general, light rail systems have been much more successful than bus systems in attracting car users. A segregated transit system presents the option of a guaranteed journey time when using public transport. Buses can rarely offer such guarantees. Examples of success are well documented:

    —  Manchester Metrolink phase 1 took 2 million car journeys off the road and reduced traffic levels on parallel roads by up to 8 per cent;

    —  20 per cent of Sheffield Supertram passengers previously used a car;

    —  A suburban rail line in Karlsruhe (Germany), converted to light rail and exended into the city centre resulted in a 400 per cent increase in patronage, 40 per cent of whom were former car users. (Reference 6)

D.  APPROPRIATENESS OF STIMULATING LRT GROWTH AND THE MEANS BY WHICH TO DO SO

  LRT systems present a real possibility for effecting modal shift away from the car to public transport and hence have the potential to reduce congestion. There are a few bus-based projects which have had some success (eg in Birmingham and Leeds Superbus) but in general bus traffic has declined dramatically over the past 25 years, especially since deregulation in 1986. During this same period of bus decline, rail based traffic has stayed steady or increased.

  In the 1998 Integrated Transport White Paper the Government indicated that an improved bus system would address the problems of increasing car use LRT coverage is an effective means of combating congestion. A commonly used argument against LRT systems is the cost of construction. However, in comparison with heavy metro systems or urban motorways, LRT is not expensive, and the private sector are prepared to support it, in part.

  Improved funding mechanisms could include:

    —  more attractive terms for private sector participation;

    —  ploughing back revenue from congestion or parking charges into LRT investment.

E.  EFFECTS OF PROCUREMENT METHODS ON TIMING, QUALITY AND COSTS OF SCHEMES

  Problems in obtaining TWA powers and the necessary funding need to be urgently addressed by the Government. It is often the case that a LRT that only takes three years to actually build may be preceded by up to nine years of planning and funding problems, ie paper work. The TWA process needs to be reviewed to reduce the time and cost of obtaining powers for construction and operation of LRT. The present arrangements can frighten off potential private sector companies because of the costs and risks.

F.  RELATION OF LIGHT RAPID TRANSPORT TO INTEGRATED TRANSPORT PLANS

  The competition of Sheffield's deregulated bus services with the city's Supertram provides an example of how LRT schemes may not reach their full potential when an LRT scheme is not properly integrated into local transport plans. In this case the private bus companies plying their trade along the same route as the Supertram undercut the Supertram fares. Promoters should be given powers to regulate bus services within corridors where LRT is proposed. No other country in the world expects LRT to succeed in competition with buses—it must be integrated fully to maximise the benefits of the fixed track investment.

REFERENCES

  1.  Mackay, Ken (1998)—Paper 8 "Sunderland Metro—Challenges and Opportunity". Taken from Light Rapid Transit Seminar at G-MEX. (Thomas Telford Ltd).

  2.  Collins, BT (1990)—Paper 3 "Light transit to stimulate development: The London Docklands Experience". Taken from "Light Transit Systems" (Thomas Telford Ltd).

  3a.  Tyson, WJ (1992)—Paper 9835 "Planning and financing Manchester Metrolink". Taken from Proceedings of the ICE 1992, Transport Vol. 95 (Thomas Telford Ltd).

  3b.  Hall, JR (1998)—Paper 1 "Metrolink Phase 2—An overview". Taken from "Light Transit Systems" (Thomas Telford Ltd).

    Beamon, TP (1998)—Paper 2 "Metrolink Phase 2—the alignment". Taken from "Light Transit Systems". (Thomas Telford Ltd).

  4a.  Russell, JHM and Horton, B (1995)—Paper 10418 "Planning of the South Yorkshire Supertram". Taken from Proceedings of the ICE 1995, Transport Vol. 111 (Thomas Telford Ltd).

  4b.  Wicks, Roy (1999)—"Integrated Transport Systems—Do we need fixed track systems?". Taken from "Seminar on Integration and Rapid Transit". (Thomas Telford Ltd).

  5.  Anderson, Peter (1999—"The development of the Croydon Tramlink". Taken from "Seminar on Integration and Rapid Transit". (Thomas Telford Ltd.)

  6.  Drechsler, G (1996)—paper 10802 "Light Railway on conventional railway tracks in Karlsruhe, Germany". Taken from Proceedings of the ICE Vol 117 (Thomas Telford Ltd).

October 1999


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 8 June 2000