Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Memoranda


Memorandum by Southampton City Council (UWP 55)

PROPOSED URBAN WHITE PAPER

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  The Urban White Paper is a logical and necessary step to implement the key recommendations of the Urban Task Force. The Urban Task Force (UTF) Report proposes a framework for urban change and contains over 100 recommendations. They cover a wide range of issues from design to investment. Southampton City Council has welcomed the Task Force's Report and considered its recommendations.

  1.2  The City Council welcomes the Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee Inquiry invitation to contribute to the debate on the Urban White Paper, and would value the opportunity of participating further.

2.  SOUTHAMPTON CONTEXT

  2.1  Southampton, with Portsmouth and neighbouring districts, forms the largest urban concentration in the South East outside London. The influence of the City extends beyond its administrative boundaries, providing a sub-regional centre for business, shopping, higher education, culture, leisure and recreation. Southampton City Council gained unitary status in April 1997.

  2.2  Southampton is a "Renaissance City" committed to promoting quality in urban life. Southampton City Council's evolving City Strategy offers an holistic vision of the future, which will play a key part in helping the City maintain that renaissance. The City Strategy reflects the distinct role of the city in the urban area. The City Local Plan Review has also commenced, and in its conception and implementation it is intended to be a pioneering model for Urban Renaissance.

3.  THE URBAN TASK FORCE REPORT

  3.1  The overriding significance of the UTF Report, and the attention it has received, is that it carries three essential messages:

    —  that cities are good and worth investment;

    —  the renaissance should affect every street in every city and town; and

    —  local authorities should drive urban success.

  3.2  The UTF Report advocates a design-led approach to urban regeneration. Southampton City Council endorses the UTF's recommendations on Urban Design Guidance. The City Council promotes the use of design as a legitimate tool for securing high quality, high density, and mixed-use, in people (not car) orientated development. However design alone will not achieve the renaissance. The City Council considers the following which derive directly from the recommendations of the UTF, should be a priority for implementation:

    —  Strengthening the role and ability of Local Authorities in achieving the urban renaissance;

    —  Funding the renaissance;

    —  Enabling the planning system to deliver urban regeneration; and

    —  Managing land supply and the urban realm.

4.  THE SCOPE OF THE WHITE PAPER

  4.1  In the following paragraphs the City Council seeks to:

    —  highlight those recommendations from the UTF Report which it considers merit prioritisation in the Urban White Paper; and

    —  outline issues not addressed by the UTF, which the Environment, Transport, and Regional Affairs Committee should examine further.

CITIES ARE GOOD AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES SHOULD DRIVE THEIR SUCCESS

4.2  UTF Recommendation:  Assign a strategic role to local authorities in ensuring management of the whole urban environment

  Local authorities within cities have a lead responsibility to facilitate city governance. City Government based on the principles of subsidiarity, mediation and partnership has a pivotal role in leading and managing the necessary change in urban environments. Cities and urban areas do not function solely on local authority administrative boundaries, and city authorities have a responsibility to provide governance for the broader city region. This entails a degree of planning and management within the city region, and careful consideration should be given to the powers and flexibility necessary to permit this.

FUNDING THE RENAISSANCE

  4.3  UTF Recommendation:  Providing an above-inflation increase in central resources allocated to local authorities for managing and maintaining the urban environment in each of the next seven years.

  This is essential if the UTF recommendations are to be implemented or pursued, given the low-base of funding available for these programmes, following significant reductions in "Other Services" funding over a number of years. The Government should assist local authorities to bid for and manage regeneration projects that are currently funded out of existing revenues at the expense of other services.

  4.4  If Government is serious about achieving policy objectives in urban areas, or indeed other broad policy objectives, then it should ensure that it focuses funding streams on the achievement of those objectives. The Committee should consider the important strategic issues of whether "investment" by that we mean both public and private expenditure, generates a higher return when it is made in cities, or urban areas.

  4.5  Further to this the New Commitment to Regeneration programme should be strengthened by combining government department's spending powers to deliver long term funding commitments for local authorities and their partners.

  4.6  The White Paper should look more carefully at the flexibility necessary to allow the budgets of public sector authorities across a city to be drawn together in the form of a "city budget". In Southampton, the notion of the Area Investment Framework, as proposed by SEEDA, is an example of how we might draw together budgets, the White Paper should consider carefully how this might be done.

PLANNING FOR CHANGE

  4.7.  UTF Recommendation:  Produce dedicated Planning Policy Guidance to support the drive for an urban renaissance, backed up by measures to ensure the policies are implemented in Regional Planning Guidance, local development plans, and planning decisions.

  This is essential if the delivery of an urban renaissance is to be made an integral goal of the planning process. Planning should be viewed as a positive mechanism for achieving change rather than primarily a reactive means of controlling development.

MANAGING THE LAND SUPPLY

  4.8  UTF recommendation:  Establish clear procedures for assessing future housing demand to ensure the early correction of an emerging under-supply or over supply of housing. All local planning authorities to carry out regular urban capacity studies on a consistent basis, as part of their development plan making process, where necessary working together across borough boundaries.

  The Government's much publicised shift in policy from a "Predict and Provide approach" to housing land to the "Plan, Monitor and Manage" regime has so far only caused confusion and is reducing the prospects of solving the housing crisis. It has yet to be supported by detailed guidance. Southampton City Council considers implementation of these recommendations to be essential.

  4.9  Housing is just one of the increasing demands on diminishing supplies of land. In cities like Southampton future development land will be created from:

    —  Suburban renewal and increased densities of development,

    —  Sustainable urban extensions into Green Belts and Strategic Gaps, and

    —  Regenerating older urban areas and recycling brownfield sites, favoured by the sequential approach. However, contrary to popular myth, Southampton and many other cities do not have large tracts of available land. We work with generally small opportunities, so that regeneration is inevitably a long term rather than a quick fix process.

  4.10  Legal and fiscal measures are necessary to enable local authorities and regional development agencies to acquire brownfield sites, which are often:

    —  In multiple ownership.

    —  Require decontamination, and

    —  Need archaeological and ecological investigation.

  4.11  Assembling physically difficult sites and releasing them as market-ready land can only be the first stage in the regeneration of our urban areas. Additional measures are then required to ensure design excellence, social-wellbeing and environmental responsibility are secured in redevelopment.

TACKLING EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION

  4.12  Tackling the social and economic realities of urban life is vital to the realisation of the urban renaissance vision. Our citizens are our main asset, investment in their health, education, wellbeing and safety are economic and social imperatives. The Urban White Paper must address:
UnemploymentLoss of urban jobs has hit full-time male manual workers hardest;
Urban out-migration
Which has been socially selective, favouring those in work and holding non-manual jobs;
PolarisationSouthampton city centre is booming, with new retail development and high quality housing, but this sits cheek by jowl with the most deprived areas;
Social exclusionThe Renaissance should strive to reverse the fortunes of these pockets of deprivation and bring social cohesion to disenfranchised communities.

  4.13  In tackling the barriers to economic development the Urban White Paper should incorporate the following themes:

    —  Investing in success,

    —  Competitiveness and innovation,

    —  Inclusiveness,

    —  Education and training to develop a flexible and skilled workforce, and

    —  Sustainability.

ACCESSIBILITY IN URBAN AREAS

  4.14  Providing adequate access to jobs, education, social, cultural and recreational opportunities without the pollution, distribution, disruption and loss of productive land caused by excessive use of the private car is a key challenge for urban communities everywhere.

  4.15  The Urban White Paper must consider how best to harness the spirit of the Millennium to achieve real and sustained co-operative action from organisations and individuals to achieve a substantial switch to using more sustainable modes of transport. In particular developing institutional structures and utilising modern ticketing technology to ensure easy, cheap and hassle-free access to an integrated multi-operator, multi-modal network of public transport services is essential.

5.  CONCLUSIONS

  5.1  To conclude:

    —  The Urban Task Force (UTF) Report represents a significant and valuable contribution to the debate on the urban renaissance, providing a solid foundation on which to build the Urban White Paper.

    —  The Committee's Inquiry should seek to widen the debate and tackle the issues of economic decline, social exclusion and accessibility in urban areas.

    —  Local Authorities are the key vehicle for successful delivery of the urban renaissance. Through development of its City Strategy and City Local Plan, and with the necessary legal and fiscal measures, Southampton is well placed to make a positive contribution.

January 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 21 February 2000