Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 580 - 599)

WEDNESDAY 29 MARCH 2000

MR JOHN NEWTON, MR EDWARD STOBART, MR EDWARD RODERICK AND MR VAUGHAN WOOLFITT

  580. Do you think they should be banned?
  (Mr Stobart) I personally do, yes. We pay drivers by the hour.
  (Mr Roderick) If I may say, this is where I will disagree with one of my colleagues. We do pay our drivers incentives but not incentives to break the law. We pay them incentives to help us in filling our vehicles more efficiently internally and in making better utilisation of those vehicles. Certainly we as a public company, as with Edward for that matter, would never encourage anybody to break the law and would not do so. It is not our desire to do so but there are people who do it.

  581. So you would like to see that stamped out. What about vehicles which are illegal? As far as I can see the spot checks that are taken on vehicles tend to be at fixed places because of the logistics of it, and so anyone who is really running a vehicle which is not meeting the law just avoids the places where those checks are?
  (Mr Roderick) If I may, Mr Bennett, I can actually tell you it is slightly worse than that. I went to a presentation a couple of years ago by the group called Brake who are concerned about safety on the roads, as you know. A Metropolitan policeman said that they had to do so many stops per day or per week or per month and therefore they stopped the most efficient operators because they knew it would take them less time to do the checks and make the numbers. We would like to see the checks moved away from volume and more to quality.

Chairman

  582. He may have been slightly pulling your leg.
  (Mr Roderick) He made the statement in a public comment and it was recorded and I did actually write to the minister about it and got a bit of a dusty reply if I remember, at the time.

Mr Donohoe

  583. We might like to see that.
  (Mr Roderick) If you wish a copy of the correspondence I will do so. He said it was the responsibility of the police authority to implement the controls.

Mr Bennett

  584. So you would like to see much more vigorous implementation of controls. What about impounding vehicles which fail?
  (Mr Roderick) Absolutely.
  (Mr Stobart) Absolutely, 100 per cent.

  585. Is not freight too cheap? Would it not be better if it was dearer to encourage people to buy more locally? If we take 25 years ago most of the beer drunk in Greater Manchester was brewed in Greater Manchester. People in Greater Manchester now drink beer and lager which are brewed almost all over Europe.
  (Mr Stobart) Hear, hear.

Chairman

  586. It depends on your definition of "beer".
  (Mr Roderick) I think the reason that you have centralisation of manufacturing is because it is more efficient on a unit cost basis.

Mr Bennett

  587. It is also because you are providing a very cheap transport system.
  (Mr Roderick) No, we do not provide a cheap transport system. We provide an efficient transport system.

Chairman

  588. Are drivers' hours too high at the moment?
  (Mr Roderick) Not in my judgment.

Mr Bennett

  589. You started off by telling us how efficient you were. Is it not logical that European hauliers reach that same efficiency? If they reach that same level of efficiency should not they be taking some of the business away from you anyway?
  (Mr Roderick) If you are good at any business that you do you try to maintain your market lead, so as quick as they try to catch us up we are working to maintain our lead against them.

Chairman

  590. What would be your view of the suggestion that drivers' hours should be reduced to 10 a day?
  (Mr Stobart) Actually driving 10 a day?

Mr Donohoe

  591. No, eight hours driving.
  (Mr Stobart) At the moment the legal limit is nine, or you can drive two 10s if you want, but then you can only drive two eights. Any move on drivers' hours obviously puts the cost up of road transport. More control over exceeding the legal hours at the moment would be a better solution.

Chairman

  592. In effect what you are saying is that rather than organising it in a particular way yourselves you would rather that this was imposed from outside?
  (Mr Stobart) Yes.

  593. What estimates have been made of the effect of the Working Time Directive?
  (Mr Roderick) I can tell you in my French businesses where they have reduced hours it is about 8.5 per cent—

  594. Eight and a half per cent overall?
  (Mr Roderick) Of the labour costs within the businesses that we have.

  595. Just the labour costs?
  (Mr Roderick) Yes, and that is about three per cent on the net costs.

  596. Would anybody else like to give a view on the Working Time Directive?
  (Mr Stobart) No.

Mr Gray

  597. Coming back to the question of whether or not you are just doing special pleading, to what degree would you say that each of your businesses' profits have been significantly affected in the last twelve months by VED and fuel? For example, are you likely to be going out of business? Has your share price collapsed? Are you facing the breadline or are you just feeling a bit of a squeeze?
  (Mr Roderick) I think the answer is that we are not going out of business, certainly I am not, and I do not think Edward is for that matter. We are always under the squeeze from our clients anyway, but what we are actually arguing here for is the maintenance of the competitiveness of our industry within our country on a level playing field against the other countries of Europe. We are not saying we are going to go bust, we are not saying that we are all in desperate trouble. What we are saying is that we want a level playing field in order to maintain the competitiveness of what we do.

  598. The reason for that being jobs?
  (Mr Roderick) Of course.
  (Mr Stobart) Yes, and, to go back to one of my earlier points, we should not have to rush to Belgium to register vehicles. I do not want to do that. I think you picked me up wrong last time.

  Chairman: We are all Europeans now, Mr Stobart, so they tell me.

  Dr Ladyman: I wanted to pick up on the point you have just made about being squeezed by your customers. Everybody else I have come into contact with who provides services to the major supermarket chains finds that they have to provide those services at margins that seem impossible to survive on to the extent that people from farmers to dressmakers are being driven out of business whilst the supermarkets seem to be making very large margins at their end of it. What is your experience of dealing with supermarkets? If the industry is under pressure, to what extent are they contributing to the problems?

Chairman

  599. If you are going to say they are all fine upstanding people, do not bother.
  (Mr Roderick) We have all been pressured for a very long time but that is because the consumers want lower prices and they want better choice of products. The choice is always there that you do not actually contract with them if you cannot make the profits that you want out of it. Then if there are insufficient people to provide the services the price goes up. The fact is that we do live in a competitive environment. We do, each as individuals, want lower prices, better quality products.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 26 July 2000