Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by the Retail Motor Industry Federation (RH 09)

  INTRODUCTION

The National Franchised Dealers Association (NFDA) is a federated association within the Retail Motor Industry Federation (RMI). The Association represents the interests of some 4,000 retailers and repairers of new cars and trucks, including those belonging to the Scottish Motor Trade Association (SMTA). The RMI serves and represents businesses concerned with the provision of motor industry products and services. It aims to assist, support and promote members in providing the highest standards of operation for the mutual benefit of themselves and their customers. The RMI is the lead body of an industry whose turnover is in excess of 65 billion pounds per annum, whose workforce numbers 600,000 and whose customers contribute 30 billion per annum in motoring taxes. The RMI works closely with the SMTA which represents the industry throughout Scotland. There are a number of associations which represent the interest of the haulage and truck operators within the industry. The Truck Division of the NFDA, through its National Truck Council, is the only organisation which is able to represent the interests of the commercial vehicle dealers which sell and service commercial vehicles. The franchised networks are the major skill providers in the industry, and are, to a large extent, the custodians of vehicle safety related issues. Through its access to relevant government agencies and authorities the NFDA's Truck Division disseminates information and represents member concerns across a wide range of issues.

The Role of the Road Haulage Industry

  The Road Haulage sector is the largest purchaser of heavy commercial vehicles in the UK and is divided into owned account operators, haulage companies, and spot hire companies. The movement of freight is vital to the well being of the UK, its economy, and people. The logistics industry moves over two billion tonnes of freight around the UK each year, most, over 80 per cent, by road. In addition to its internal transport needs, the UK is also a major trading nation which requires good international transport links. The main problem of switching freight from road to rail is the small landmass within the UK. Average freight journey length in the UK is under 100 miles, while rail only starts to compete at 300 miles. Added to which significant increases in the rail infrastructure, required to meet modern demands are unlikely, and rail's ability to deliver "Just in Time" is very limited.

Changes in the Sector

  The sector has undergone significant change in recent years. There are now less trucks on the road than 40 years ago, the average weight of goods lifted has increased, and more intensive use is being made of available trucks, largely due to improvements in logistics management. The impact of technology has been significant, resulting in increasing service intervals, better diagnostics and the introduction of telematics. Modern trucks require less frequent and expensive maintenance and are more economical to operate. Pressures on margins means both dealers and manufacturers are increasingly seeking to become service providers of a total life customer care package and to take control of how their products are financed or leased. Options include tyre maintenance, safety inspections, MOT testing, VED provision, general repairs, European cover etc. The net result has been a significant increase in contract hire as opposed to outright purchase. Contract hire in recent years accounted for six to seven per cent of registrations, and is now estimated to account for about 15 per cent. An operator's decision to sell and lease back his vehicles has often in the past been dictated by the need to free capital for investment purposes but is now increasingly a direct result of economic pressures such as high fuel prices.

The Market for New Trucks

  The earlier nineties was marked by the longest and deepest recession in the truck industry's history. Although the market has recovered to some extent, 1999 sales only represent 74 per cent of 1989 levels. Increased efficiency in the operator sector and the long term shift to heavier vehicles is also gradually reducing the overall size of the market. Lorry numbers in use have fallen by 13 per cent in the last 10 years.

  Despite the increasing rationalisation and restructuring amongst many manufacturers, there still remains an excess of supply over demand, and pressure on dealer margins is critical. The reduction in the average age of fleets and the shortening of vehicle model lives as technology improves has also led to a collapse in residual values for many trucks. The retail selling market for trucks is therefore more competitive than it has ever been. The truck market is also highly sensitive to changes in the economic environment and in many respects is a barometer of the health of the economy—in particular of the corporate sector. However the industry is also strongly influenced by changes in the regulatory framework and by government policy towards transport in general which is currently perceived as failing to understand the industry.

  As a result of these factors it is not an over-exaggeration to say that the industry is in a critical stage which is already seeing some operators being forced out of business and which may ultimately impact on the distribution network itself.

Distribution networks

  The number of commercial vehicle sales outlets has shrunk by some 40 per cent since 1988 to some 370 outlets with the emphasis on investment in larger territories and the maintenance of service points. The complexity of modern trucks and the increasing attention paid to safety aspects underlines the requirement for a strong franchised-backed distribution structure, and many operators who may have in the past operated their in-house workshops are now out-sourcing repair and maintenance to the franchised network.

The Key Issues facing the Competitiveness of the Industry

  Despite the extremely welcome announcement in the Pre-Budget Statement of the Chancellor's intention to cease applying the fuel duty escalator, British operators continue to pay the highest fuel duties and VED across Europe. The recently issued Consultation Paper on Reform of Vehicle Excise Duty also states that the tax on a litre of diesel should be higher than on petrol to reflect the higher levels of carbon and energy in diesel.

  A typical UK Transport Company operating around 90 vehicles already faces a financial penalty of some 7 to 8 per cent of their cost base compared to their average European counterpart. The Freight Transport Association states that a French operator has as much as a 14 per cent cost advantage over his UK counterpart.

  Fuel represents the single biggest factor for an operator accounting for up to 36 per cent of the operator's costs. The UK is the only country in the EU that does not differentiate significantly between unleaded petrol and diesel. Latest price comparisons show that UK prices ex VAT are 57 per cent more than in France, 61 per cent more than in Germany and 94 per cent more than in Spain. It is estimated that the Government lost £400,000,000 in tax receipts in 1998 because hauliers were purchasing fuel abroad.

  UK operators also pay the highest VED in Europe—three times the EU average, and for a European standard 40 tonne, five axle unit, up to 12 times the rate of some other countries.

  In July 1998 restrictions on cabotage were removed raising the prospect of competition from foreign registered hauliers operating on marginal return load rates and with much lower fuel costs. The FTA survey in July 1999 appeared to confirm this by finding that one third of companies questioned are already using foreign operators to carry a proportion of their domestic freight, whilst government figures confirm that there has been a 57 per cent increase in foreign vehicle trips to the UK since 1996.

  Britain's position on the geographical edge of Europe necessitates that transport is able to deliver a cheap, efficient service if business is to remain competitive in domestic and international markets. We are increasingly concerned at the number of operators who are now seriously reported to be considering the re-registration of their businesses in Europe. If this should happen, not only will the Treasury lose VED revenue, but the temptation to source new product from mainland Europe, where prices are already significantly cheaper, will be that much stronger.

  We agree that we need to move to a more transparent, enforceable and cost efficient fiscal and pricing regime, but this must not be through further increases in the overall tax burden on the road freight industry which is already disadvantaged against its competitors in mainland Europe.

Progress to Date

  The RMI is fully supportive of the concepts outlined in the Government's Integrated Transport Policy White Paper produced in July 1998 subsequently outlined in more detail in the Strategy Paper for a Sustainable Distribution, and of course welcomes the withdrawal of the fuel duty escalator. However we support the view of the FTA and the RHA that urgent action is required by the Government to ensure that a level playing field with the rest of Europe is adopted. In this respect the Spring Budget is critical. Without urgent action at this time it is anticipated that the number of firms no longer able to remain in business will increase. We welcome the work of the Integrated Transport Commission in offering independent advice on allowing 44 tonnes access to Britain's roads. We also welcome the work of the Road Haulage Forum which has set up Sub Groups to address many of the specific issues raised above—for example the extent of cabotage, the requirement to impound illegally operated vehicles, a review of VED, and improvements in the compliance and the enforcement of transport laws, particularly relating to maintenance and safety.

Environmental issues

  We welcome the commitment by the Government to improve road maintenance. The increasing congestion and the unreliability of road networks is requiring industry to build inefficiencies into delivery schedules—eroding efficiency gains and increasing costs.

  The environmental impact of freight movement can be reduced by a few sensible policies such as those which would accrue from the removal of irresponsible operators, encouraging fewer heavier trucks, building good roads and where appropriate shifting some freight from road to rail. The RMI fully supports the campaign to allow 44 tonne lorries on six axles on UK roads. The economic and environmental benefits of allowing 44 tonnes lorries have already been well documented.

  Overseas hauliers of course run trucks of 40 tonnes on five axles which is the most damaging weight configuration for our roads.

  Trucks must be clearly separated from the political realities of taxing private car use. The high price of fuel provides no evidence of environmental benefits as it eats into the reserves that companies would normally have for the purchase of new environmentally friendly vehicles. The price of fuel has also had an adverse effect on the environment by putting pressure on operators to cut costs elsewhere such as service and maintenance.

  There is a case for integral transport combining road and rail. Under private ownership we can expect rail to make some headway towards 10 per cent of freight volumes. This headway will not be dented by trucks moving to 44 tonnes.

Changes to Government Policy needed

  The RMI is fully supportive of proposals which have already been advocated by the Road Haulage Industry's principal trade bodies which seek to achieve a more level playing field for UK operators, particularly in respect of fuel prices. These include the consideration of an essential user rebate scheme and/or an appropriate reduction in VED being made to UK international operators to compensate for the Road Infrastructure Charges (Eurovignettes) as levied by some other EU member states.

  We recognise that VED rates have been frozen and are under review but would stress the urgency of finding an acceptable solution.

  Whilst we welcomed the introduction of the £1,000 rebate via a reduced pollution certificate, insufficient operators have been able to take advantage of this scheme. Consideration should be given to incentives to enable operators to invest directly in more modern, fuel-efficient vehicles. Incentives for the uptake of alternative fuels which potentially offer environmental benefits should also be considered.

  The frustrations stemming from the unacceptable levels of road congestion are growing. Apart from the obvious costs to industry, this is even being manifested in a growing shortage of drivers in the industry. The road network is an under-used asset to the extent that it is virtually empty overnight. We need to consider ways of moving more road freight journeys to the hours between 9.00 pm and 6.00 am. Congestion could be eased by allowing vehicles to turn left at traffic lights on red when traffic flow permits, following a practice used successfully in the USA. Speed limits on motorways and trunk roads have not, to the best of our knowledge, been changed since their introduction in the 1970s and should be reviewed.

  Turning to an issue which is interlinked with the road haulage industry, it is inevitable that there will be a significant increase in the number of vans making home deliveries as a consequence of the boom in internet ordering. The RMI has always been an advocate of annual MOT testing, and is concerned that commercial vehicles below 3.5 tonnes undertaking potentially very high mileages will not, under the current regulations, be required to undergo inspection until they are three years old. Commercial vehicles above 3.5 tonnes are of course subject to an annual test and the intermediate inspections required to satisfy the issue of an operators' licence.

  Finally we believe that the Government should introduce a permanent 100 per cent capital allowance for SME's. Bearing in mind that the number of third party non franchised service providers such as contract hire companies and fleet management companies now entering the market, there is also the case for abolishing the current system of capital allowances, which is heavily weighted in favour of financiers. It could be replaced with a system of capital allowances which are targeted against the usage rather than the ownership of plant and equipment, including commercial vehicles.

February 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 26 July 2000