Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by Meeks of Luton (RH39)

  WHAT THE TRANSPORT INDUSTRY WANTS FROM OUR GOVERNMENT

1.  Competitive fuel duty and fuel prices

We would like to know who benefited from 3p per litre saving in fuel duty, with Ultra Low Sulphur Diesel over the original "dirty" Diesel?

  Foreign Lorries and International Operators never purchase fuel in this country, because it is too expensive. Fuel purchased from abroad is dirty diesel and NOT ULSD, which is not complimentary to the Governments Environmental Policy.

  We bulk purchase Fuel at approximately 18,000 ltrs at a time. The Oil Companies have used us to fund the competition at the pumps, by slashing the differential in bulk and pump prices. It used to be around 30p per gallon. At present it is about 9p, but at times last year it was almost the same price!

2.  Vehicle Excise Duty at reasonable rates

  Transport Companies in the UK pay far too much compared to rest of Europe.

  From within our Industry it would appear whoever (DETR.?) sets the rates for different combinations does not understand what they are doing? For example, they allowed a two axle unit with a two axle trailer, normally a maximum of 32 ton at £2,530, to up rate to 35 ton with the same number of axles for £5,170. This again makes a mockery of the environmental argument and the damage caused to the roads.

3.  A Transport Forum that Works

  It is no good having talks about talks, which is what we remember about Dr. John Reid, we have to see progress being made.

  The majority of Hauliers see the Forum as the proper platform from which to fight our cause. However, it was the Demonstrations that got us the Transport Forum in the first place and being in Park Lane enabled us to get our message across to the general public.

4.  Acknowledgement of the Importance of Transport to Industry..

  Everybody who operates commercial vehicles are fed up with it being Politically Correct to bash Lorries.

  There may well be 30-40 companies the size of Eddie Stobart, but there are thousands of companies like A.E. Meeks Ltd. and without us the Transport System would collapse. We want to know we are being listened to and not dismissed out of hand, being labelled as "extremists."

5.  Government Transport Policy

  The Government must differentiate between commercial vehicles and cars. So far when policy hits the motorist it hits the trucks as well. Public Transport desperately needs investment to get people out of their cars, but trucks go out for a purpose.

6.  Realistic Road Building Programme

  Road building and maintenance must be taken seriously and not just another budget to be slashed and funds reallocated. More revenue raised from Fuel Duty and Vehicle Excise Duty should be made available for this purpose.

7.  Operators Licences

  A review of the Operators Licence Legislation, especially the changes implemented last year. This makes it highly likely that Operators could lose their Licence for two relatively minor offences, especially as Traffic Commissioners now have no leeway as to what disciplinary action to take.

  A change in the Law on overloading. Make the Individual or Company who overloads a commercial vehicle equally responsible with the driver/haulier for the offence. This would make them take it seriously, because at the moment some just do not care. Hauliers are regularly given false information on weights and then unknowingly commit an offence.

8.  The Government claims our Industry is Inefficient

  It is official that the Government thinks the Road Transport Industry is inefficient. No operator sends a vehicle out to be inefficient and to lose money. The "Just in Time" principle and return load element of our industry have caused untold damage. Every customer wants to use a system of return loads and more importantly where return load rates apply. "Someone" has to pay for the outward bound journey? Our company does back load when possible, but we will not go from Liverpool to Portsmouth for less than we would charge from Luton to Portsmouth. That is what is expected.

  Certain major Companies with large warehouses (RDC's) are the cause of horrendous delays for vehicles delivering/collecting. Delays of three to six hours are common place and the attitude of take it or leave it is prevalent. We had a customer who had three orders for Woolworths at Swindon. When an order was placed a booking was given, so three orders three delivery bookings all on the same day! So naturally all three deliveries were loaded on one trailer in the correct order and despatched for the bookings 0913-1208 and 1445. We were condemned and threatened with being banned, because of our actions. Our vehicle was at Swindon from 0900 until gone 1630 hours. We were well prepared to wait, but Woolworths expected three different deliveries on three different vehicles. So who is the company who is inflexible, arrogant and inefficient? Regrettably, this is common place in Industry but it is equally important for this side to be put right as well.

  Finally, no Operator wants bigger and heavier vehicles. It is the big users of road transport who demand such increases in weight capacities and volume. These companies make all the savings, but the Haulier gains very little, if anything from providing these expensive vehicles.

9.  Foreign Vehicles in UK

  Make the foreign vehicles pay. Either by the "Brit Disc" and/or by restricting the amount of fuel they can bring into this country.

February 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 26 July 2000