Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


English Welsh & Scottish Railway

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF TTCI TRACK MODELLING PREPARED BY LEK CONSULTING LIMITED

INTRODUCTION

  This presentation addresses the financial implications of TTCI's engineering modelling, with respect to track maintenance and renewal costs (ie, for ballast, rail and sleepers).

  Five scenarios have been constructed which allow comparison of track maintenance and renewal costs for different track configurations and maintenance practices.

    —  the scenarios are used to illustrate the degree of savings available to Railtrack through the adoption of more cost efficient track practices (as found in the US).

  Unit costs have been estimated based on UK practices and adjusted to reflect the cost of higher quality materials for certain scenarios (eg harder rail, high grade ballast).

  The steady-state cost run rate in £ per kGTM is calculated based on total lifecycle costs, ie, including all relevant capital and operating expenditure.

DEFINITION OF TRACK SCENARIOS ANALYSED

  
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Scenario 4
Scenario 5
Rail
  
  
  
  
  
—hardness
248 BNH
248 BHN
248 BHN
340 BHN
340 BHN
—weight
110/113 lbs/yd1
110/113 lbs/yd1
110/113 lbs/yd1
132 lbs/yd
132 lbs/yd
—lube and grind
No
No
Yes
No
No
Sleepers
  
  
  
  
  
—spacing
Wood 30" (20%)
Concrete 25.7" (80%)
Wood 30" (20%)
Concrete 25.7" (80%)
Wood 30" (20%)
Concrete 25.7" (80%)
Wood 19"
Concrete 24"
Ballast
  
  
  
  
  
—tamping cycle
—grade
Mixed network
Standard UK
Freight network
Standard UK
Freight network
Standard UK
Freight network
High grade
Freight network
High grade
Description
Typical of UK network
UK network for freight standards
As Scenario 2 with lubrication and grinding
Typical of US Class 1 Railroad
UK freight network using US configuration

Note: 1  Engineering analysis assumes UK rail is split in the following way: 110 lbs/yd (20 per cent), 113 lbs/yd (80 per cent). Both types of rail are costed at the 113 lbs/yd rate.

Source: EWS, TTCI, LEK analysis.

Results from TTCI indicate that the adoption of US track materials and freight standards would reduce track lifecycle costs by approximately £2 per kGTM.




17 March 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 26 July 2000