Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by the Federation of the Electronics Industry (PPP 02)

THE PROPOSED PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP FOR NATS

INTRODUCTION

  The Federation of the Electronics Industry is the leading UK Trade Association representing the Information Technology, Telecommunications, Aerospace and Naval Electronics and Components Industries. The Federation represents some 300 companies ranging from world leaders through medium to small enterprises, including service as well as manufacturing operations. We welcome this opportunity to submit evidence to the Sub-committee on the proposed Public-Private Partnership for NATS.

  We support the Government's decision to separate NATS from the CAA. The separation will allow the CAA to concentrate on tough, effective regulation and the new NATS to attract the investment it needs to remain at the forefront of technological development necessary to deal with the increasing volume of air traffic. We are also of the view that the Government has endeavoured to construct a partnership scheme that is in the interests of the NATS staff. It protects their pension entitlements and through shareholding gives them incentive to make the enterprise a success. Our remarks are directed to the question "what implications the public-private partnership as currently proposed will have for safety standards . . .".

COMMENTS

  The aviation transport sector has a first class safety record, due in great part to the highly respected safety regulation and enforcement regime currently in place. To make changes would, in our view, be counter productive at a time of increasing pressure on the whole aviation community.

  Safety regulations are formulated and enacted under the auspices of the Civil Aviation Authority established by Act of Parliament and are rightly prescriptive in comparison with other sectors. They are also highly specialised and established through close consultation with industry and the international aviation community. Each transport sector has developed in a way that best suits its particular circumstances. The aviation sector in particular is highly international in its nature and there is a need to ensure conformity of approach with its international collaborators.

  We do not believe there is scope for increasing efficiency by bringing all of the regulatory activities under a single authority. To do so would create an increased level of bureaucracy, a dilution of specialist attention to air safety issues and an increase in costs. However, across transport sectors there are areas of commonality and we would encourage the formation of a National cross modal co-ordinating body tasked with ensuring effective transfer of best-practice techniques between the transport sectors.

  The proposal to establish a European Aviation Safety Authority needs to be taken into account. We believe that the formation of this Authority is vital to the progress of industrial development and enhanced safety standards. The Authority should be a legal entity with both regulatory and enforcement power which subsumes the National agencies. The excellent reputation of the CAA puts it in a strong position to influence the formation of the European body, a position which would be jeopardised if it were subsumed into a single UK trans-sector body.

CONCLUSION

  We support the main thrust of the Government's initiative to privatise NATS. NATS has a skill base and experience which is not available in any other Government Department or body and we welcome its retention as a single entity. In the event of it becoming a private company, it will quickly need to attract to itself commercial, project and contract management skills. The need to accommodate increasing capacity demands encompasses airport services and the Government needs to pursue an active role in ensuring consistant and co-ordinated measures to achieve the necessary improvements.

  The Federation wishes to thank the Sub-committee for this opportunity to express our Members' views. It is hoped that these comments are seen as constructive and will be helpful in the Sub-committee's deliberations.

A. Parish

Director General


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 17 February 2000