Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by BAAplc (PPP 04)

THE PROPOSED PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP FOR NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES (NATS)

INTRODUCTION

  1.  As owner of a large proportion of the nation's airport infrastructure, BAA welcomes another opportunity to stress to the committee the importance of NATS being able to access the private funds necessary for its capital investment programme to meet the growing demand for air travel with the highest standards of safety and having the commercial freedom to develop its business.

  2.  In BAA's view, the proposals brought forward by the DETR in July, following the consultation with the industry, for a strategic partner for NATS will fulfil these objectives and enhance the ability of NATS to deliver a world leading air traffic management (ATM) service safely and in line with the national interest.

  3.  The committee has identified several key aspects of the PPP for consideration. In addition to comments on these, BAA believes that there are several additional issues relating to environment and the wider ATC issues which the committee should note.

MANAGEMENT

  4.  NATS already has an experienced management team which has already shown its capability to manage a high degree of change in a high technology industry and create a safe, customer service business culture. The incorporation of a strategic partner will bring further private sector management skills to allow the business to grow and develop free from the present constraints.

FINANCE

  5.  BAA believes that the proposals for the PPP are the most appropriate for NATS to free itself from the financing restraints of the public sector and to allow it properly to finance its investment programme. Whilst corporatisation and the "trust" concept have been adopted in other countries, the advantages of bringing a private partner, in terms of flexibility and financial capability to assist in the development of a high technology and fast moving business to meet the needs of demanding customers, far outweigh the disadvantages that detractors of the proposals claim. The committee should note that the International Air Transport Association, as part of its new strategy relating to European ATC, is now calling for the commercialisation or privatisation of all European airspace ATC providers. The industry needs a much more flexible and robust approach to investment that can only be provided from the private sector.

ACCOUNTABILITY

  6.  The proposals for partnership directors and a stakeholder council, which, when compared with the arrangements made in the airline and airport sector, appear cumbersome, will ensure that NATS will be accountable to the needs of its customers and ultimately to Government. Whilst these arrangements are necessary given the monopoly en route part of the business, they should not fetter the management of NATS to develop its business in new markets or the freedom to develop new products and services. NATS must have the freedom to manage its business and provide the service its customers require. In particular, the PPP will give NATS the opportunity to apply its world leading ATM expertise to ATC centres and airports beyond the UK, enhancing safety and providing further opportunities for UK businesses.

SAFETY STANDARDS

  7.  As with airports and airlines, safety of operation is the paramount goal for NATS. It has been defined as their "ultimate" product. The proposals, following the overwhelming consensus of the industry, enhance the role of the CAA Safety Regulation Group (SRG) as the safety regulator for NATS. The PPP will reinforce the division between the service provider and the safety regulator and make the same arrangements as exist for airline and airports. Throughout the air transport industry, there is a clear definition of responsibility between infrastructure providers and operators. The proposals for the NATS PPP emphasise this and the committee should note the excellent safety record of those airports and airlines which are in the private sector. As we have stated before, private ownership has the potential to place more onerous safety responsibilities on the directors of private companies. This, together with the re-affirmed role of SRG as the aviation safety regulator, should reassure the committee that the proposed arrangements should enhance rather than detract from the safe provision of ATC services.

INVESTMENT

  8.  The very nature of NATS investment, the infrastructure and software to complete Swanwick and the new Scottish centre, requires flexibility and innovation for efficient application of new technology in the ATM business. The committee will be aware of the harsh criticism now being directed at the US FAA by leading US airlines regarding the delays in implementing new systems at both en route and airport ATC facilities. As the new communication and surveillance technology is rolled out, it will be imperative that the ATM providers have the financial capability to deploy it and other technologies to safely improve airspace capacity.

STAFF

  9.  Whilst it is understandable that the staff of NATS are concerned at the PPP proposals, given the protracted period of uncertainty, they should relish the opportunities that a private partner will bring. The opportunities for a company operating in the private sector to grow and develop its business will be greater. Again, the examples of the airports and airlines operating in such an environment should be noted. The proposal for the PPP make clear statements relating to pensions and share ownership.

ALTERNATIVES

  10.  From our position in the private sector and as a key provider of air transport infrastructure, BAA would urge the committee to view the PPP proposals positively. The corporatisation and trust options would simply not give NATS the business freedom required for it to meet the needs of the industry. The nation needs investment in transport infrastructure and there is a real danger that UK business and prosperity will be affected if air travel becomes constrained by infrastructure limitations. The safe provision of ATC capacity is central to this and can only be provided by a strategic partner for NATS.

ENVIRONMENT

  11.  Although environmental concerns were largely absent from the consultation on the PPP, the proposals do make general reference to environmental concerns. Again citing experience with airports and airlines, the general public expects companies operating in the private sector to offer effective protection of the environment and this is reflected in emerging government policy. It is therefore important that the regulation of NATS takes full recognition of these aspects and that both NATS and SRG develop effective audit of en-route and airport ATC procedures against key environmental goals.

EUROPE

  12.  The committee will be aware through recent airline user comments of the degradation of operational ATC performance across Europe this summer and the effects this has had on the airline product and customer confidence. The committee will note the excellent performance of NATS with regard to delays in its complex and densely used airspace over the London airports compared with that achieved across other areas of western Europe. These delays impact upon the airports business as well but it should be emphasised that ATM issues cannot be solved by looking at each nation state individually. By definition, ATM is an inter-connected global network and UK and North Atlantic Oceanic airspace are mere chips of a global system.

  13.  As identified above, airline users are calling for more investment and better performance from national ATM providers and this will increasingly focus on issues of ownership and investment. The PPP proposals point the way for the UK to couple what will be a world leading ATM facility at Swanwick with an innovative approach to ownership of the ATM provider for the benefit of UK airports and all airlines and users. The committee, whilst rightly concerned with issues of safety, should now support the PPP ownership proposals in the context of the emerging strategies that Eurocontrol, other state providers and ICAO are developing to provide effective ATM capacity within Europe and globally into the next century.

October 1999


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 17 February 2000