Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by National Air Traffic Services Ltd (PPP 05)

PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  The Committee is conducting an inquiry into the proposed Public-Private Partnership (PPP) for National Air Traffic Services Ltd (NATS), and has sought written evidence from interested parties. This Memorandum sets out NATS' views on the PPP, and responds to the specific issues raised by the Committee. The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) plans to submit a separate note on regulatory aspects.

2.  BACKGROUND

Traffic levels are rising

  2.1  The 1990s have been characterised by strong and sustained growth in traffic levels, typically around5 per cent annually. The rate of growth has increased in the last two years, running at nearer to 7 per cent annually. Traffic levels have nearly doubled since the late 1980s and the expectation is for this growth to continue. NATS controllers will handle 1.9 million aircraft movements this year and current forecasts indicate that movements will rise to around 2.7 million by 2010.

NATS safety record

  2.2  Safety is of paramount importance to NATS. Despite the increase in traffic, the number of risk bearing aircraft proximity incidents reported by pilots and controllers, where NATS contributed to the cause, remain low.


1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999

7
8
13
12
16
11
6
8*

*Figures for 1999 are complete to 27 September 1999. Reports for 1999 have yet to be assessed by the UK Airprox Board.

  2.3  The first Report of the UK Airprox Board was published recently and provides an analysis of Airprox incidents reported in 1998. The Report notes that the number of risk bearing incidents in UK airspace per 100,000 flying hours, involving commercial air transport, remained stable throughout the 1990s'. tapering in 1998 to the lowest rate recorded. In 1990, the rate of risk bearing incidents per 100,000 flying hours for commercial air transport was 2.69; in 1998 the rate was 1.20. The great majority of risk bearing Airprox incidents continue to involve general aviation and other aircraft flying outside controlled airspace.

  2.4  Though not a measure of safety, NATS monitors the number of "overloads" reported by NATS controllers. These reports are designed to provide operational managers with an early indication that airspace arrangements in particular sectors may need to be reviewed. As such, the process represents an important risk avoidance measure. The number of reported overloads increased in 1998 following management encouragement to staff to report such events. The number has remained static this year.


1998
1999
Jan-Mar
Apr-Jun
Jul-Sep
Oct-Dec
Jan-Mar
Apr-Jun
Jul-Sep*

16
13
24
12
11
16
20

*Period to 26 September.

  2.5  NATS is constantly looking for ways to improve the safety of the ATC system. There are a number of safety improvement actions currently underway, which are directed at reducing the probability of safety incidents, including:

    (i)  Continued re-sectorisation—designing procedures which not only add more airspace capacity, but reduce the complexity of the controller task and the peak workload on individual controller positions;

    (ii)  Level busts—working with aircraft operators to raise awareness amongst pilots about the importance of following controller instructions;

    (iii)  Safety nets—commissioning research and development into options for further improving the effectiveness of the Short Term Conflict Alert, which provides warning of separation loss to controllers;

    (iv)  Lessson learning—ensuring that where lessons can be learned, information on safety incidents is shared across the whole organisation.

Delays caused by NATS are down nearly 20 per cent this year

  2.6  Despite traffic growth of nearly 7 per cent this year, delays in UK airspace have been reduced by19 per cent in 1999. The average delay to all flights, attributable to NATS, has been reduced from 1.63 minutes in the period from January to September 1998 to 1.31 minutes in the same period in 1999. This contrasts with the situation this year in Europe where a 7 per cent increase in traffic has led to a 73 per cent increase in delays attributable to European air traffic control. In Europe, the average delay to all flights increased in the January to September period from 3.41 minutes in 1998 to 5.90 minutes in 1999. This increase is only partly accounted for by the Kosovo crisis.

NATS charges to customers are falling

  2.7  NATS has been steadily reducing the charges made to its customers. The NATS' element of the Eurocontrol en route charge was £60.46 per service unit in 1994 (in 1994 prices). The charge in 1999 is £50 per service unit. Charges for North Atlantic services and at Airports have fallen more sharply still.

NATS major investment projects are moving ahead

  2.8  NATS' Two Centre Strategy has been endorsed by Government as the best means of meeting future capacity requirements, whilst providing an appropriate level of operational contingency cover between centres. This Strategy involves completion of the New En Route Centre at Swanwick and construction of the New Scottish Centre at Prestwick.

  2.9  NATS has continued to make good progress on the Swanwick Centre. Since the revised plan was established in October 1998, all milestones have been met, and planned activities remain on schedule. Following "Technical Transfer" in March, and the successful completion in May of the first phase of the large-scale simulation programme, the second phase of the simulation programme will begin in November. Recognising that this is a major and complex system development, NATS will continue to manage very closely the remaining milestones and risks through to the planned operational service date of Winter 2001-02.

  2.10  The New Scottish Centre project has also made progress, with the start of initial enabling works and the appointment of Bechtel to support the project team in a project definition phase.

The aviation industry is becoming ever more liberalised and commercial

  2.11  The debate about the future of NATS needs to be set in the context of developments in the aviation industry as a whole. Twenty years ago, the airline industry was dominated by state-owned national flag-carriers. Now the airlines are almost entirely in the private sector, in an industry dominated by alliances, takeovers and new start-ups. Airports were traditionally state-owned, but the process of privatising airports is now well advanced around the world. Aircraft manufacturing and the ATC equipment market have seen a process of takeover and consolidation.

  2.12  Under pressure from airlines and governments to improve efficiency and reduce delays, it seems clear that the same process is now starting in the provision of air traffic services. Currently, around twenty of the world's air traffic service providers have been given the freedom to operate commercially, either in the public sector or with private sector participation. The span of countries is very wide and includes for example Germany, Ireland, Canada, Switzerland, Australia, Spain, New Zealand, South Africa, the Netherlands, Portugal, Thailand, the Czech Republic, Romania, and the Ukraine.

  2.13  The issue has been brought into sharp focus this year because of the delay situation in Europe, and the growing recognition that the status quo is not an option for the future development of the industry. ATC in Europe is currently provided from 49 ATC centres, by 31 national ATC providers, operating 18 hardware systems and 30 different software languages. This situation is not sustainable, and the airlines seem certain to increase pressure on governments for rationalisation, with a more integrated system and a smaller number of more commercial providers. The point is well illustrated by the "Five Point Action Plan", launched this month by the Director General of the International Air Transport Association in response to this year's problems in Europe. Included amongst these five points is the proposal to Transport Ministers in European states: "To liberalise the provision of air traffic services in Europe through commercialisation, privatisation or corporatisation in each of the European states".

  2.14  This reflects thinking not only within the international airline community but also amongst leading figures responsible for air traffic services in Europe. In a recent article in Flight International, Wolfgang Phillip, Eurocontrol's Senior Director expressed the view that: "Air traffic control is very difficult in Government systems . . . they are always limited by government rules and a lot of limitations. Separation from government control is the only way, in the longer run, to give air navigation service providers the financial and managerial freedom to run their businesses. Nationalist thinking disappears and business thinking arrives."

  2.15  NATS today is a very different sort of organisation from when it was first attached to the CAA in 1973. Over that period, NATS has changed from an organisation that was an offshoot of the Ministry of Defence and the Board of Trade to become a free-standing company focused on financial and operational targets. NATS sees PPP as another step in its evolution—a step which, like all other previous changes in NATS, will be accompanied by a continuing commitment to give top priority to safety.

3.  NATS OBJECTIVES FOR THE PPP ARE CLEAR

  3.1  The NATS' Board and management have welcomed the Government's proposals for the PPP. NATS wants a PPP process that gives adequate scope for consideration of its views, ensures that staff are well informed and involved, retains customer confidence and ends by delivering a partnership structure which helps the Company to achieve its objectives.

  3.2  NATS has defined its objectives for the PPP, following wide-ranging discussions with customers and staff as well as Government. These objectives are summarised below:

    (i)  Maintain NATS total commitment to safety.

    (ii)  Create the basis for a secure future for NATS business by:

    —  maintaining NATS as a unified business with a clear focus on safety, and with an air traffic management capability able to provide full gate-to-gate service;

    —  securing access to funds for investment in existing activities, and in new opportunities on a commercial basis;

    —  accessing a broader range of management skills;

    —  creating a stable structure of ownership, which can help NATS achieve its objectives;

    —  securing the independence to build a global, ATM-related, growth business in partnership with others as necessary.

    (iii)  Create a future for NATS staff in which they can have good conditions, fair treatment, and new opportunities in an expanding company.

    (iv)  Establish a fair and stable regulatory environment which encourages NATS to become more efficient and to develop new business.

    (v)  Establish a transparent, commercial relationship with Government in all its activities with NATS, whilst recognising Government's sovereign responsibilities.

    (vi)  Enable NATS to deliver benefits for all stakeholders:

    —  for Customers—safety, reduced delays, improved cost-effectiveness,

    —  for Suppliers—additional business for those who can help NATS meets its objectives, and

    —  for Shareholders—a fair return on their Investment.

4.  ARRANGEMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT FINANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Management

  4.1  The Government wishes to see NATS enhance and broaden its management expertise and skills base to enable it to be at the forefront of industry developments. NATS agrees that bringing in a private sector partner would enable the Company to broaden its management skills. Although the management of NATS' air traffic control operations and safety is recognised as being outstandingly effective, the history of the Swanwick project highlighted a need for more effective management of such projects. In addition, the Company has not had the requirement in the public sector to develop its capability in areas such as marketing. The expertise that a private sector partner could bring, together with the freedom to act commercially, and on a global basis, will help NATS broaden its management across the board to address existing tasks and new opportunities.

  4.2  Within the overall first priority of safety, the new regime of economic regulation will provide a framework for incentivising the Company to achieve greater efficiency, leading to a greater focus on customer interests, transparency in costs and charges, and further reductions in charges.

Managerial and Commercial Freedom

  4.3  The proposals will give the Company managerial and commercial freedom to take advantage of the air traffic service opportunities that are opening up throughout the world, and to manage the business in the best interests of stakeholders. The potential market for air traffic services is growing rapidly and there is a pressing need for increases in capacity in Europe and further afield. NATS has a range of capabilities that can help meet that demand. NATS recognises that it can benefit from access to commercial expertise in opening up these new markets and in the management of large, complex IT projects.

Finance

  4.4  Capital funding for new air traffic control systems has been reduced in recent years, from a peak of £130 million in 1993-94 to £36 million in 1998-99. The only mechanisms currently available for financing major investments remain funding approved by DETR and HM Treasury, or the Private Finance Initiative (PFI). NATS continues to regard PFI as an inappropriate mechanism for financing large, complex software systems and supports the conclusions reached by the Transport Committee in its 1995 Report on NATS privatisation (paragraph 96):

    "In common with the Department of Transport and the CAA, we do not believe the Private Finance Initiative offers a long term solution to the problem of obtaining investment finance for NATS, since its extensive use—even if it were possible to identify relevant and practicable opportunities—would fragment NATS to an unacceptable extent."

  4.5  Freeing NATS from public sector financial constraints will allow the Company to plan ahead with certainty rather than on a stop-go basis. The Company already needs to borrow for investment, but the investment programme will make NATS significantly cash negative, requiring additional future funding. Access to private investment will enable the Company to invest in world leading ATC provision and expand into new markets.

  4.6  NATS has a secure and stable income, though at present it is required to pay back to its customers all profits above the target rate of return generated from its en-route business. This cost-plus approach provides no structural incentives to ensure the effective control of the Company's cost base, and no mechanism for leveraging this potential profit stream to build the Company into a world class business for the benefit of current and future potential customers and stakeholders.

Accountability

  4.7  NATS has long argued, as has the Transport Committee, that separating the provision of air traffic services from the CAA would in itself improve accountability by introducing a more transparent relationship between the regulator and regulated.

  4.8  Accountability will also be strengthened by the proposals in the PPP for:

    (i)  involvement of a private sector partner;

    (ii)  the appointment of Government directors to the Board;

    (iii)  the proposed requirement for Board unanimity in strategic areas, including approval of the annual business plan, the raising of new equity and capital, and policy on dividends and re-investment;

    (iv)  strengthened arrangements for consultation on NATS' plans through the Stakeholders Council, with representatives from Government, airspace users, the strategic partner, and NATS staff and management;

    (v)  the Golden Share.

  4.9  More generally, NATS believes that the PPP will perserve accountability by keeping NATS as a unified business, thereby reducing the scope for buck-passing or confusion as to where accountability lies. It is essential that the company should be maintained as a single entity that is able to provide the full range of air traffic management services both within the UK and internationally.

  4.10  The shareholding structure needs to avoid conflicts of interest, ensure stability and safeguard the coherence of NATS as a single entity. The choice of partner is critical to the successful implementation of the PPP, and NATS would hope to contribute to the selection criteria.

5.  IMPLICATIONS FOR SAFETY, INVESTMENT AND STAFF

Safety

  5.1  In recent months, many people have expressed concerns that the PPP will put air safety at risk. Yet it is clear that the Government, the CAA and everyone in NATS is committed to safety as the over-riding priority, and that existing systems of safety regulation and safety assurance with continue. As the Deputy Prime Minister made clear at the Labour Party Conference, the Government would "never, repeat never, play games with people's safety". NATS strongly shares that view.

  5.2  Safety is the top priority component of NATS' core business. Safety cannot therefore be a public/private issue because, without safety, there is no business. With access to investment, the PPP means that NATS will be able to maintain its excellent safety record at a time when the volume of air traffic is growing rapidly. NATS welcomes the Government's clear statement that there will be no diminution either of safety standards or of the safety regulator's powers to enforce these standards.

  5.3  The Company has a strong safety culture and it is NATS' intent that this safety culture will be maintained and fostered. NATS view is that:

    (i)  the separation of service provision and safety regulation can only serve to enhance public perceptions of safety, as there will be greater transparency between NATS and the CAA, and it will be clear that safety regulation remains under government control;

    (ii)  with the exception of NATS, the service provision aspects of the UK aviation industry are now largely a private sector activity. Although questions about safety were raised when BA and BAA were privatised, there is no evidence at all that safety standards in the UK aviation industry have suffered because companies are now in the private sector. BA and BAA now have over 20 years combined experience of private sector operation in competitive markets with no diminution of safety standards. NATS believes that PPP will lead to safety standards in air traffic being maintained and even improved as the Company seeks to become a leading player in the developing international market;

    (iii)  from a business point of view, it is inconceivable that a company whose sole business is safety would put that at risk by cutting corners. Decisions on such matters as controllers working hours will continue to be subject to safety regulation. Decisions on capital investment and running costs will continue to be a matter for the Boarad in determining the annual business plan. This is an area where it is proposed that the Government directors will have a power of veto;

    (vi)  the Company structure should not create artificial barriers between different parts of the organisation which provide operational ATC services; and

    (v)  all these cultural, organisational and business pressures will serve to underpin NATS commitment to safety under the PPP. As an extra backstop the Government would have directors on the Board who will be able to keep a watching brief on safety.

Investment

  5.4  The PPP is the best option for enabling NATS to have access to investment funds. The business needs £1 billion over the next ten years in a steady and sustained way. This investment is required to maintain and enhance NATS' safety systems, to provide sufficient capacity to meet growing traffic demand, and to improve the productivity and cost effectiveness of the organisation. As noted in paragraph 2.8, the core of the programme is the Two Centre Strategy. Investment in advanced air traffic management systems and computer assistance tools are needed to meet capacity requirements in the longer term. The new centres at Swanwick and Prestwick will provide the necessary expansion capability and the technology platform for future development.

Staff

  5.5  NATS welcomes the fact that the Government has addressed the main concerns expressed by staff in respect of pensions and terms and conditions of service. The Government has made clear that staff in employment at the time PPP is established will be entitled to remain members of the CAA Pension Scheme.

  5.6  The Company strongly believes that the PPP is in the best long term interests of staff. In the public sector, cutting costs has been NATS' principal means of improving financial performance. PPP will open up new opportunities to grow the business both in the UK and overseas, thus improving employment opportunities. As new investment delivers modern, more reliable equipment systems and increased levels of automation, it is very much in the interests of staff that opportunities should be provided to replace tasks that are no longer necessary.

  5.7  The Government has made clear that it will stand by its undertaking that 5 per cent of the shares will be allocated to all employees, thereby giving them a stake in the future success of the business. Staff will also have greater involvement in the business through representation on the Stakeholder Council.

6.  THE ALTERNATIVES

  6.1  The Government considered a number of different options for the future status of the Company. Given that safety standards can be maintained in the private sector, it concluded that the best way to ensure NATS stayed at the forefront of industry developments was to introduce a broader base of management skills and expertise and access to private finance. NATS' observations on these alternative options are as follows:

    (i)  Trust status: The closest example is NavCanada. The model requires a complex structure, to separate ownership of the assets from operational management and to manage the different interests of the various stakeholders. The structure does not provide strong incentives to improve efficiency, nor does it provide access to private sector management expertise and skills which the PPP will afford.

    (ii)  Corporatisation: This model already operates in a number of countries. The Chartered IPOC, which is advocated by the NATS trades unions, is a form of corporatisation. We understand that it was rejected by the Government not on public finance grounds, but because it too did not achieve the objective of providing structual incentives to improve efficiency. The proposals for the Post Office are also a form of corporatisation. The main difference between NATS and the Post Office is the scale and complexity of the investment required as well as the very different nature of the market in which the two companies operate.

  6.2  In NATS' view, the alternative options would not deliver the benefits of the PPP. They do not:

    —  free NATS from the Government borrowing rules or Treasury controls;

    —  give employees a direct stake in the business;

    —  provide structural incentives to improve efficiency and performance; or

    —  allow NATS to have access to the investment it needs in a steady and sustained way to tackle the threat of growing delays.

  6.3  The status quo is not an option. Investment is essential and the present Government recognises that PFI is not the right solution to NATS' investment requirements.

7.  CONCLUSION

  7.1  The future status of NATS has been under review since the early 1990s. As a result there has been a great deal of uncertainty for both staff and management and the decade has been characterised for the Company by political indecision and lack of commitment to future investment funding. NATS has continued to provide a safe and efficient service to its customers, but the uncertainty needs to be ended to enable planning to proceed on future investment and growth. NATS will oppose any plan to revert to the status quo, with insufficient funding for its projects and no clear way forward on the funding of the New Scottish Centre.

  7.2  The PPP, if properly implemented, has the potential to be an imaginative and successful solution. It provides extensive safeguards to ensure that safety and the public interest are secured. It is the quickest route to ensure that vital investment is made in the ATC system. It will enable management decisions to be taken on a business basis, in accordance with best private sector disciplines. It will provide a genuine partnership between the public and private sectors, and will deliver a safe, modern and efficient air traffic control system. PPP will enable NATS to develop the business for the long term, and thus secure the company's future in a growing and increasingly competitive market.

8 October 1999


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 17 February 2000