Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 360 - 361)

TUESDAY 6 JUNE 2000

MR MIKE WALKER, DR CHRIS SPRAY AND MR PAUL WOODCOCK

  360. That is getting rid of other people's nasties. What about keeping your own nasties? Do they not have some rights under biodiversity?
  (Dr Spray) I am sure they do, and what one would like to see is the scientific research to actually understand what role they play. I think the answer to the sewage one is that the research is there, and should society, at the end of it, decide they wish to see certain things back, that is up to society to decide. One of the whole problems and why, if you like, conservation is always a better word than biodiversity, is that strictly speaking if we were talking about biodiversity we ought to be concentrating on beetles. There are many, many more beetles than almost any other species in the world, by orders of magnitude.

  361. Why did the water industry not take on the cuddly beetle rather than the otter?
  (Dr Spray) We took on the cuddly snail, in Northumbrian Water's case, but the otter one was because of the high profile and because very early on in the process it was seen as the flagship that others would follow.[6]

  (Mr Woodcock) It is important to make the point, however, that the water industry has taken on things like the depressed river mussel as well. That is not cuddly, it is not very sexy but it gives a sign of our commitment.

  Chairman: Finally, on that note, can I thank you very much for your evidence.





6   Note by witness: Northumbrian Water are Biodiversity Champions for the Round Mouthed Whorl Snail (vertigo genesii) nationally. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 7 December 2000