Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 362 - 379)

TUESDAY 6 JUNE 2000

MR JOHN MORTIMER AND MS JANE TOPLISS

Chairman

  362. Can I welcome you to the Committee for the last session this morning and ask you to introduce yourselves for the record, please?

  (Mr Mortimer) Thank you, Chairman. My name is John Mortimer, I am Chairman of the CBI Minerals Committee and I represent the CBI input to your inquiry. We thank you greatly for the opportunity to do so. With me is Jane Topliss who is Senior Policy Adviser at the CBI, specifically working in the area of minerals. If I may say why both of us, coming from a minerals background, represent the CBI as a whole, it is because minerals have a major impact and contribution to the issue of biodiversity in Britain, and it is something which the industry has been working on and taken to heart for many years. The CBI recognises the importance of biodiversity and the importance of it contribution to the UK's plans to enhance, protect and maintain the biodiversity that we have.

Mr Cummings

  363. To what extent do you feel it is the responsibility of business in the United Kingdom to be involved in biodiversity conservation?
  (Mr Mortimer) I think we think it is a responsibility of business to be involved. We think, also, that it is the responsibility of everybody in the country to be involved in biodiversity. The degree to which business is involved, I think, should depend on the degree to which business interacts with the bio-environment. Obviously, agriculture—and we have heard from them this morning—the water industry and the minerals industry are people who interact greatly with the environment and have significant impacts, both positive as well as negative, on the biodiversity of the country, so it is very important. For companies that are not quite so at that interface they, too, have a responsibility—take chemical companies, for instance—because of the discharge question. So we have a responsibility to understand and control discharges to land, air and water, because those can influence biodiversity not only on a local level but on a global level. So, yes, of course, industry has a prime responsibility to be involved in this area.

  364. What efforts are you, as an organisation, making to ensure that your members are taking part in the biodiversity conservation process?
  (Mr Mortimer) The issue here is one of awareness and we believe, in the CBI, that our members should be made aware—are, indeed, aware, we believe—of the issue of sustainability and it is our role, within the CBI, to ensure that the issue of biodiversity within the sustainability question is something which is not ignored.

  365. Have you any practical examples of the efforts you are making?
  (Mr Mortimer) We have many practical examples of the on-the-ground progress that is being made by the industry in biodiversity matters.

  366. What are you doing, as the CBI?
  (Mr Mortimer) Within the minerals sector of the CBI, which I am particularly qualified to speak about, we are working at this moment, for instance, with the FRCA. Jane can tell you about this.
  (Ms Topliss) We are working on our steering group at the moment with the FRCA dealing with producing guidelines as to how to restore agricultural land back to the standard it was—so taking into account drainage matters and making sure that the soil is still viable. We are also working with the RSPB on a steering group there to aid, again, the restoration of mineral sites to make sure they are compatible to encourage bird life as well as the necessary flora and fauna associated with it. On a more general sort of example, the CBI deals a lot with the various policy issues and environmental regulatory regimes and advises companies how to do that in the best and most practical way. We also have the benchmark CONTOUR which we encourage all organisations to take forward and use as a way to look at the environmental management systems, how they are coping and how they are improving—where they can improve—compared to other organisations in the same sectors.
  (Mr Mortimer) The starting point for environmental management is a real understanding of what your impacts are. That is at the heart of the CBI's environmental programme at the moment.

  367. What response are you receiving from your members towards your efforts to make them more aware about biodiversity?
  (Mr Mortimer) Members, like members of the public, are very willing to take biodiversity issues on board. Obviously, there is an issue of cost-benefit for the company as well as for the environment. Business is business, and businesses will have to evaluate the cost in any proposals. However, I think it is well-recognised that there are many things that industry can do to enhance biodiversity which, in fact, are not all that expensive.

Mrs Ellman

  368. Such as?
  (Mr Mortimer) Such as an example from the power generation company, where the water used in the cooling towers to circulate through the gases to cool the gases is kept in a reservoir. The reservoir, rather than simply being a sterile reservoir for cooling purposes, can actually also be a biodiversity resource. So, in that way, they are looking at their whole process and saying "What can we do here?". In the minerals sector, the opportunity is enormous, and, really, from the very first moment that mineral extraction starts to take place new opportunities for biodiversity are created. An example from my career was working a sand deposit in Bedfordshire, where we moved into a new area, removed the topsoil, exposed the sand and within a very short time watched pop up something called the childing pink. The childing pink is an extremely rare plant—I do not know where it lists in the rankings of a Biodiversity Action Plan—and it only lives in exposed sand. So until the sand is exposed it does not have the opportunity to live. So there is this understanding and awareness within the industry, and it is very willingly accepted by industry that there is so much that can be done.

Chairman

  369. How far should that sand be stopped from being extracted in order to allow that particular plant to thrive?
  (Mr Mortimer) I think that is a bridge which, obviously, has to be crossed when it arises.

  370. Let us assume it arises now.
  (Mr Mortimer) To take a slightly different example, of Sand Martins—

  371. No, no. Let us stick to—
  (Mr Mortimer) You want to stick with the childing Pink. Within a well-planned mineral operation the operator should have options about where he is extracting, and the critical thing in many species—both plant and animal species—is their life-cycle, and in a situation where a rare species is found then it should be incumbent on the operator to work with the authorities and the NGOs to find ways in which the workings can be diverted in order that that life-cycle moment of the plant can be accommodated.

Chairman

  372. Who discovered the Pink? You?
  (Mr Mortimer) We discovered the Pink.

  373. You got in touch with who?
  (Mr Mortimer) Forgive me, it is a long time ago. However, taking a hypothetical situation—

  374. Were you pleased? Who did you deal with? Who protected the site? Did you have to negotiate a little bit on the permissions so that that was protected and you got something in quid pro quo?
  (Mr Mortimer) You asked a very interesting question "Were you pleased?" No production person is pleased when his plans have been upset by the occurrence of, perhaps, archaeology as well as flora and fauna.

  375. So the Pink upset you more than it delighted you?
  (Mr Mortimer) I was going to say the immediate reaction is "Oh dear, I was planning to produce here for six months" but, increasingly, the industry as a whole is aware of its responsibilities and, also, is able to take pleasure from discovery and is able to take—and I think it is important to take—public relations benefit from situations like that. So it is a question of getting—

  376. Forgive me. How would you guard against the temptation of industry just saying "This is a bit of a problem. We will carry on regardless and not tell anybody"? How can biodiversity be protected in that kind of environment?
  (Mr Mortimer) One cannot protect against that. One can only rely on the sense of responsibility that operators have. Responsibility which is trained in, or educated in, to industry is something which we are all about and something we work very closely with SCAs—

  377. The CBI is engaged in that, is it?
  (Ms Topliss) The CBI does not just encourage industry on a national or international level to take part in biodiversity conservation, and that kind of thing; it encourages individual companies and individual site operators to go out and—you speak about the minerals industry and a lot of the guys working on the site are proud, they will go out, and a lot of the SSSIs and other conservation areas would never have been discovered unless somebody said "Look, we have got this, come in" and it is designated.

Mr Gray

  378. We have so far been very encouraged by your remarks about the commitment of industry to biodiversity. Ignoring the fact that you are a constituent, can I ask you a couple of direct and difficult questions on the subject?
  (Mr Mortimer) You always do.

  379. Why did the CBI not make a written submission to this Committee, if your commitment is that great?
  (Mr Mortimer) I beg your pardon. The CBI did make a written submission, Mr Gray, though I believe it was sent yesterday.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 7 December 2000