Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 20 - 39)

WEDNESDAY 24 MAY 2000

MR FRED W. SMITH, MR RUSH O'KEEFE, MR NIGEL GOODSON AND MR MORGAN FOULKES

  20. Yes.
  (Mr Smith) Yes, well we do not operate inside the EU, Mr Stevenson. We only operate international flights that touch the EU.

  21. Nevertheless, Mr Smith, you are a world wide operator with enormous experience, so clearly you have opinions about these things. We are seeking your advice and clarification so we can understand a little better. Could you therefore, as briefly as possible, indicate to the Committee why you believe that there is no `Open Skies' regime in the European Union?
  (Mr Smith) Well I misunderstood your question. If you are talking about EU Member States having an `Open Skies' agreement within the EU, yes I do understand that to be the case, but I thought you were referring to does the EU have an `Open Skies' agreement with other legal entities that provide that. Yes, I do understand that; for European operators, yes I do understand that.

  22. Thank you, that is fine. That is very helpful. You say, both sides, that Bermuda 2 is badly out of date. We all have our views about that. Could you again briefly identify why you believe it to be out of date and what are the reasons that it is out of date?
  (Mr Smith) In our situation—and I presume this is similar to UPS, but they can speak for themselves obviously—the movement of goods by air has become a huge trade facilitation mechanism. While the tonnage is light compared to sea transport—only about 2 percent of the weight of international trade is moved by air—it now represents over 40 percent of all the value of international trade. If you take agriculture and petroleum out it is well over half. By 2020, it will probably be 80 percent. I should point out in the United Kingdom your airborne trade is about 20 percent, versus the 40 percent worldwide. That is because a very large percentage of your air eligible trade does not go out of the United Kingdom; it is moved by lorry over to the Continent and goes out of Schipol or Paris or Sofia. The United States now has, for cargo operations at least and in most cases for passenger operations too, 42 `Open Skies' agreements and in fact we have Fifth freedom authorities from most industrialised countries in the world except the United Kingdom. We have them in China, Japan, Philippines, France, Germany, Turkey, Italy, India and so forth. The United Kingdom is almost unique and that is why I say that it is out of date in terms of the movement of goods.

  23. Would you accept therefore a proposition I put to you that one of the many reasons it is out of date is the intransigence of the United States Government in refusing to negotiate their policies towards their domestic market and their `America First' policy?
  (Mr Smith) We support the elimination of `America First', we support the elimination of the ownership restrictions. I personally lobbied on behalf of British carriers with the Secretary of Transportation and the head of the FAA to remove wet-leasing restrictions and to remove Fifth freedom restrictions and in fact the United States put on the table last Fall Fifth freedom, Seventh freedom and wet-leasing capabilities for new carriers, and I would point out to you that we have never suggested Seventh freedom rights out of the UK which is an entirely different animal. The US international air cargo market is seven times bigger than the UK market. The US has said that as a matter of policy that it will not deal with cabotage and as I am sure you know, article 7 of the Chicago Convention specifically was put in there to prevent countries from trying to force cabotage on a country including international bilateral process. It was put in there primarily I think to protect against the Americans who were very powerful in 1944 trying to force cabotage on people. So if you start talking about cabotage—which we support; we would not hesitate for a moment to seek cabotage—I think you are really talking about big internal political issues in the United States. You are talking about a renegotiation of the entire Chicago Convention Treaty because the United States in fact had a number of aviation treaties which say if you grant cabotage to one entity, say the UK, it must apply to all of these other treaties. I think also the internal US cargo market is probably 50 times bigger than the UK internal market. So we think the United States would try to be responsive with what it put on the table last Fall. I understand the BCAA's position, but I do not agree with it.

  24. Do you agree with that, Mr Goodson?
  (Mr Goodson) Yes, I know we were asked to stay silent if we agreed, but I think it is worth emphasising the point that UPS supports all the lobbying activities that Federal Express also support in terms of foreign ownership, wet-leasing and the `Fly America' policy.

Mr Gray

  25. I think I am right in saying that FedEx are one of the largest contributors to the Al Gore funding campaign, so you are in a strong position to lobby on behalf of the British cargo interests. Could you just tell us what you have done since last year in forwarding that campaign and why it has not been successful given that you are so well connected with the US government?
  (Mr Smith) Well, I do not think that we in any way, shape or form are one of the largest contributors to the Al Gore campaign. Al Gore was our Senator from Tennessee for years which leads to the connections that are sometimes reported on. George W Bush was my fraternity brother and I have not taken a position one way or another on the election, but I will this Summer.

Chairman

  26. I think it is called guilt by association!
  (Mr Smith) So we have no such clout and it certainly is not because of any political contributions.

Mr Gray

  27. Leave that aside, what have you done in the last 12 months in lobbying the US government?
  (Mr Smith) The most lobbying I have done in the US government, including appearing before Congress, is to support the issues that the BCAA wanted, which was wet-leasing and the fifth and Seventh freedom traffic rights out of the United States and to state that we did not have any objections to those other things we mentioned. That is the only thing we have done.

  28. But you failed?
  (Mr Smith) Well, I think we did not fail on that side of the Atlantic; we failed on this side of the Atlantic. We thought there was an agreement basically, as far as our cargo goes, as late as last September and then the landscape changed for whatever reason and there was no agreement.

Miss McIntosh

  29. Just for the record, I would like to remind everyone of my husband working an American airline company. I would like to pick up on a couple of comments that Mr Smith made in the evidence he has given us just now. He referred to `America First', which I presume is commonly known as `Fly America'?
  (Mr Smith) Yes, I think that is right.

  30. Would you accept, Mr Smith, that your company gained some economic benefit from `Fly America'?
  (Mr Smith) I do not know if we do or not, but it certainly pales in comparison to other issues. We would support the elimination of any `Fly America' area—we do not oppose that in the least.

  31. I have heard your company say that before, Mr Smith, but I have not seen any concrete evidence?
  (Mr Smith) I do not know how much more you want than the CEO and the founder of the company to say we totally support it. It is not within our power to give it; if it were, I would. We support the elimination of that US government criteria; we have no objections to its elimination, none.

  32. And what representations have you made to the Secretary of State for Transportation?
  (Mr Smith) The same as I am making to you. I have told them that and am happy to reaffirm it in writing or cross my heart; anyway you like.

  33. You could not actually say to the Committee this afternoon what percentage of your average earnings or—
  (Mr Smith) It is tiny. It would be very tiny, very small. We carry military cargoes for the US military as a result of our being in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet. We are the largest single component of the US Military Civil Reserve Air Fleet. We flew over the half civil missions flown, over 700 I think wide bodied flights, into Desert Shield and Desert Storm in support of our troops and your troops, so to that extent we get some military cargo, but we have no hesitation in supporting the repeal of any `Fly America' restrictions. None whatsoever.

  34. You also said, Mr Smith, that you do not negotiate with the European Union. As you probably are aware that there is on the table a proposal that in future no such bilateral air negotiations will be conducted by the Commission on behalf of the United States. What is the policy of both FedEx and UPS on that proposal?
  (Mr Goodson) I think from the UPS perspective we are quite content with the present existing regime where bilateral agreements are negotiated between Member States and other countries. We also believe that that does not necessarily exclude the Commission from having a role in trying to develop the template beyond `Open Skies', possibly beyond the situation where the majority of Member States will have already, particularly with the US, negotiated `Open Skies' agreements. We certainly believe there is a role for the Commission there, but it would be, I think, helpful to that role if the UK specifically were to negotiate on its own behalf a bilateral `Open Skies' agreement with the US.

Chairman

  35. Mr Smith?
  (Mr Smith) As I understand it, the European Union is not a party to the Chicago Convention and its ability to represent the Member States of the EU has been opposed most prominently by the United Kingdom over Heathrow and some other issues. We would not object if that is the regulatory regime that existed but that, in our opinion, will be a long time coming and I hope it will not preclude modernisation of Bermuda 2 in the interim.

Mr Donohoe

  36. What percentage of your business relies on Fifth freedom rights?
  (Mr Foulkes) In terms of volume in Europe?

  37. Anywhere, in terms of your operation?
  (Mr Foulkes) I would say a figure I can give you is that roughly 12 percent of intra-European flight segments are Fifth freedoms.

Chairman

  38. Hang on a minute. Intra-European flight segments. You mean the flights between one country and another within the European Union.
  (Mr Foulkes) Yes, whether UPS or a charter contracted out to a European operator.

  Chairman: I just need to know what we are talking about.

Mr Donohoe

  39. We talk English in here sometimes. Some of them do, anyway. I do not! How about yourself?
  (Mr Smith) Our international revenues are about 4 billion dollars estimated on the fiscal year that starts June 1. I do not know the figure exactly but if I had to guess it is probably around, worldwide, 300, 400 million dollars if that.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 15 August 2000