Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 40 - 59)

WEDNESDAY 24 MAY 2000

MR FRED W. SMITH, MR RUSH O'KEEFE, MR NIGEL GOODSON AND MR MORGAN FOULKES

  40. What percentage of your business is made of the line to line work between the US and UK?
  (Mr Smith) Our European/US business, I think, of the four some billion dollars both ways would be some place in the billion 1 or 2—I might be off there 10 percent but roughly there and I would imagine the UK is some place in order of magnitude of 20 percent of that. This is just off the top of my head; they would be directionally right I think.

  41. And you, sir?
  (Mr Foulkes) We do not have any figures we can give you on behalf of UPS.

  42. Can you tell me how many Fifth freedom rights you have?
  (Mr Goodson) Fifth freedom rights that UPS has—sorry.
  (Mr Foulkes) In Europe or out of the UK?

  43. Out of the UK?
  (Mr Foulkes) Out of the UK we operate one Fifth freedom operation at present. One going to Germany and the other one coming back, so two segments.

  44. And out of the US?
  (Mr Foulkes) To Europe?

  45. Yes.
  (Mr Foulkes) I would say that at the moment we would probably have seven Fifth freedom operations in Europe.

  Mr Donohoe: Okay.

Chairman

  46. Do you want to tell us what those are?
  (Mr Foulkes) Yes, I need to get back to—

  Chairman: While you are searching we will come back.

Mr Donohoe

  47. Mr Smith?
  (Mr Smith) We have regulatory authority under Bermuda 2 for Fifth freedom operations from the United Kingdom to India, Syria, Iraq and Germany and at the present time we do not exercise any of those Fifth freedom authorities out of the UK because those Fifth freedom authorities are point to point authorities that were of the type and vision when the Chicago Convention was first done in 1944. What we need is the authority to take something from the United Kingdom to any place on our system. So it does not make sense for us to go to one of our shippers and say: "We have a wonderful service to Syria, but we cannot take it to the other 99½ percent of the world".

  48. Can you tell me why having fought so hard to get your rights at Prestwick you have now withdrawn that service?
  (Mr Smith) I would be happy to. First of all I told you at the start that my name is Frederick W Smith. My middle name is Wallace, so nothing was more controversial in my Mother's family than when we eliminated a service to Scotland, I can assure you.

  49. You maybe should put it back in.
  (Mr Smith) We have been working on this issue for a long time. We think the restrictions on all cargo operations are very injurious to the United Kingdom and its importers and exporters. In frustration, over a year ago, we came and I made courtesy call on Mr Prescott along with a member of our Board of Directors, Senator George Mitchell, who of course is well regarded in the United Kingdom and told Mr Prescott at the time we were going to make an extra bilateral application to Her Majesty's Government and we would take in the obligation of service to Scotland as well as to the south of England as long as we were given open beyonds, but we would not accept authority from one point without the other. Of course we were granted the Fifth freedom rights from Scotland. Throughout the Fall we were told we were being disingenuous, in fact the head of the BCAA was quoted in the paper as saying that this was an enormous bluff, that we would never pull the service down from Scotland. We felt the United States and the UK had a deal and were told that as late as October and then we became hostage to the so-called mini-deal and for whatever reason the political landscape changed over here and I felt that I needed to be a man of my word so we ceased service to Scotland. We will not resume it until such time as there is a more liberal regime. As I mentioned a moment ago, we are prepared to announce on the date that a new Bermuda 2 concerning `Open Skies' for all cargoes launched, we will resume wide body Fifth freedom service into Scotland. It may or may not be to Prestwick. We do not want to be tied to one airport and I know you are from Ayrshire, but we will resume service to Scotland.

  50. If it is not to Ayrshire where will it be?
  (Mr Smith) Well, I think you have three choices here. You can go to Prestwick, you can go to Glasgow and you can go to Edinburgh. Silicon Glen is closer to the first two so it will probably be one of those but we certainly would want a little competition between those two airports than somebody just assuming they are going to get our business.
  (Mr Goodson) I might add, incidentally, that UPS operates out of Edinburgh, 60 miles away from Prestwick and when we intended to set up an operation there we thought we had Fifth freedom rights which had been granted to us when they were originally set up. But the Government told us that we did not have Fifth freedom rights operating out of Edinburgh. The lack of logic in that position, I think, tells its own story, that Prestwick, 60 miles away, is granted unrestricted Fifth freedoms and yet Edinburgh there is no Fifth freedom operations granted to UPS at all.

  51. Maybe you should have lobbied me earlier then.
  (Mr Goodson) Well, maybe!
  (Mr Smith) By the way, Mr Donohoe, I want to point out that when we asked Her Majesty's Government for that authority, we made it very clear we were not seeking exclusive authority, that we would be perfectly okay if this applied to any US carrier and in fact it did apply to any US carrier.

  52. If we just expand this into the more general, what rights are you looking for? If you were offered something what would you be having as a shopping list as to demands you would think would meet your business?
  (Mr Smith) The only thing we have ever asked for is open beyonds, so called Fifth freedom rights out of the United Kingdom so we can pick up traffic in the United Kingdom and take them to third countries and we have that authority from virtually every other country in the world that we serve, almost without exception. There are a couple of exceptions; Russia is one, Russia and the United Kingdom.

Chairman

  53. You do not think, Mr Smith, that that is because you have enormous economic muscle and that the British are in fact, even yourself said, a very small nation? When they are negotiating they must have something on their side?
  (Mr Smith) Well, Madam Chairman, I think that you are right. I think that is exactly the problem here. The all cargo rights, which were not until last Fall, particularly controversial with anyone, including British Airways. I talked to Bob Ayling about it personally. Then they became controversial. The net result of it was not anything other than British importers and exporters and British jobs being affected. So yes, it was used as a negotiating chip for Heathrow with the American Airlines/British Airways alliance, regardless of what it was doing to the UK economy. You see, our position has been supported by the Freight Transport Association, the Scottish Electronic Manufacturers Association. In fact, almost all of the broad economic interests in the United Kingdom has supported our position and in fact yours in your 1994 finding.

Mr Olner

  54. Yes, but the fact at large is that UK companies cannot compete in the USA and these rights are never going to be granted until UK companies have the right to compete over there. How are we going to get out of this impasse?
  (Mr Smith) You are going to have to convince the—well, first of all, as I said to you, you need to read Article 7 of the Chicago Convention—I have a copy of it here if you want—but it was put in there precisely to prevent what you are trying to do which is to have an international operation or exchange of rights to force a country open up its domestic market. Now I have said we do not have any opposition to that—we support it—but I think as long as that is a requirement of Her Majesty's Government, I do not think you will get an agreement.

  55. Well your Government has requirements that we cannot wet-lease and charter aircraft, have they not?
  (Mr Smith) And that was on the table, Mr Olner. I personally spoke to the Secretary of Transportation, I personally worked with the head of the FAA and in fact the US Government offered wet-leasing, offered Fifth freedom and offered Seventh freedom rights, which is again an international air cargo market that is seven times bigger than the United Kingdom. Make sure everybody understands what that is; Seventh freedom rights are that you can originate a flight in our country and go to a third country without having any connection to the homeland. We have never suggested that for the United Kingdom. That is why we have been most puzzled by the BCAA's thing. We have never suggested that we would have intra-EU authority or could compete with them in their operations. We have only suggested that there be Fifth freedom authorities on through international flights.

  56. I am mindful of time; could you perhaps, both of you, whether you cross-subsidise your European operations from your domestic revenues in the United States?
  (Mr Smith) We do not. We have a very profitable operation in Europe and we do not cross-subsidise the European operations. Taken together, the westbound traffic is profitable, our westbound traffic is up 28 percent out of Europe. European exports are pouring into the United States and absent services like we offer, and our good competitors, UPS, I dare say that the modern, high-tech and high-value added world simply could not compete. It is those services which you are denying yourself by having this impact and I wish I could solve it, because I have said I have no objection to everything that you want, everything.
  (Mr Goodson) UPS does not cross-subsidise its operations in Europe. Its European and international operations generally have to stand on their own feet commercially and they are commercially successful.

  57. So how do the hourly rates of charging or wet-leasing one of your Boeing 727s, for example, in the States and in Europe compare?
  (Mr Goodson) UPS does not wet-lease any aircraft so it does not apply to us.

  58. And you as well?
  (Mr Smith) We do not either.

  59. Finally, what proportion of your aircraft meet or exceed Chapter 3 noise damage?
  (Mr Goodson) UPS, 100 percent and that has been the case since 1996.
  (Mr Smith) 100 percent.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 15 August 2000