Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs - Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence [Back to Report]

---

Here you can browse the Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence which were ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 26 July 2000.

CONTENTS

Memorandum by Nigel Smith Esq (GF 01)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION

Annex

TIME FOR THE RDAs TO GET STUCK IN

Memorandum by Urban Splash (GF 02)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION ENGLAND

Memorandum by the Land Value Taxation Campaign (GF 03)

GAP FUNDING: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Memorandum by the CPRE—North Wilts and Swindon Group (GF 04)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Memorandum by Hyndburn First (GF 05)

A NEW APPROACH TO GAP FUNDING FOR URBAN REGENERATION PROJECTS

Memorandum by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (GF 06)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Memorandum by the National Housing Federation (GF 07)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Memorandum by the Alliance for Regional Aid (GF 08)

THE PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENT PROGRAMME

Annex

ALLIANCE FOR REGIONAL AID—EXAMPLES OF PIP

Memorandum by Deeley Properties Limited (GF 09)

GAP FUNDING

Memorandum by Bellway Homes (GF 10)

GAP FUNDING

Memorandum by Speke Garston Development Company (GF 11)

THE IMPLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEME FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Memorandum by the Local Government Association (GF 12)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Annex 1

Memorandum by the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (GF 13)

IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Annex A

EXAMPLES OF GAP FUNDED PROJECTS

Memorandum by the Regional Development Agencies (GF 14)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Memorandum by Chris Brown Esq (GF 15)

PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENT PROGRAMME REPLACEMENT

Memorandum by The Regeneration Practice (GF 16)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION (EC) RULING RESULTING IN CANCELLATION OF THE UK GAP FUNDING PROGRAMME

Memorandum by The Countryside Agency (GF 17)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Memorandum by Leeds City Council (GF 18)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Memorandum by the House Builders Federation (GF 19)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RULING ON GAP FUNDING SCHEMES FOR URBAN REGENERATION IN ENGLAND

Memorandum by Barnsley MBC (GF 20)

ENDING OF THE PIP SCHEME

Annex

BEEHIVE BUILDING BUZZING AGAIN IN BARNSLEY

Memorandum by the Black Training and Enterprise Group (GF 21)

Memorandum by the Competition Directorate of the European Commission (GF 22) Gap Funding and Regeneration Policy

Memorandum by English Partnerships (GF 23)

PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENT PROGRAMME

---

---

Prepared 14 September 2000