Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Fourth Special Report



FOURTH SPECIAL REPORT

The Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee has agreed to the following Special Report:—

RESPONSE FROM THE GOVERNMENT TO THE NINTH REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE: TRAVELLING FAIRS

The Government's response is restricted to those aspects of the Report's recommendations and conclusions which relate to the role of the planning system and to Government policy on travelling showpeople's planning needs: Recommendations (c), (f), (h), and (j).

Recommendation (c)

We are very strongly in favour of an urban renaissance. No large community ought to be without a central focus for public entertainment, a place where events such as funfairs can be held. Villages, towns and cities with such spaces ought to ensure they are designed to make holding funfairs easy, with good access to services such as water and electricity, while those which do not have such areas ought to be striving to get them, as recommended in the current Planning Policy Guidance Note 17 (PPG17). Further, we recommend that the revised PPG17 make specific reference to the value of historic travelling fairs and the role which they can play in the regeneration of town centres (paragraph 23).

The Government shares the Committee's view of the value of historic travelling fairs and agrees that they can make a contribution to the vitality of towns. The planning system has a vital role to play in providing and safeguarding informal recreation and open spaces. Amongst their other functions, these open areas are the ones most often used by travelling fairs. The Government will be setting out proposals to help local authorities secure stronger protection for valuable open space in a draft revision of Planning Policy Guidance Note 17 (PPG17) "Sport and Recreation", which will be issued for public consultation soon. This will help to ensure that the sites which can be used by fairs are available in the future.

Recommendation (f)

It is clear to us that many local authorities are not properly considering the needs of travelling showpeople, either during the preparation of their development plans, or when considering individual applications for sites for travelling showpeople's depots. We welcome the undertaking given to us by the Local Government Association to draw the attention of its members to the existence of Circular 22/91, so that it no longer "languishes in the bottom drawer" of planning officers' desks. Local authorities must take their responsibilities towards travelling showpeople, as outlined in Circular 22/91, as seriously as they take their responsibilities to any other sector of society (paragraph 36).

We note what the report says about the practical operation of the Department's Circular 22/91 "Travelling Showpeople" and welcome the undertaking from the Local Government Association to draw its members' attention to the Circular.

Recommendation (h)

All local authorities should heed the advice contained in Circular 22/91 and ensure that they consider the needs of travelling showpeople when preparing their development plans. We emphasise that the primary responsibility for ensuring that adequate provision is made for the needs of travelling showpeople in a particular area lies with the local planning authority. Nevertheless, it would greatly assist the process if the Showmen's Guild of Great Britain became more vigorously and systematically involved in the drawing up of both regional and local development plans. Where no provision for showpeople's sites is made in the development plan for an area where the Guild has identified a need for such sites, an appeal should be made to the Secretary of State (paragraph 43).

Although the Committee emphasises that the primary responsibility for ensuring that the needs of travelling showpeople are met lies with local authorities, Circular 22/91 encourages local planning authorities to discuss travelling showpeople's needs with them at an early stage; for example, when local plans are being drawn up and before any planning application is submitted.

The recommendation encourages the Guild to lodge an 'appeal' with the Secretary of State where no provision is made for showpeople's sites in development plans but a need has been identified by the Guild. There is in fact no right of appeal to the Secretary of State in relation to development plan proposals but there is a mechanism through which concerns can be raised and representations made during the preparation or reviews of development plans. Objections to deposit drafts of plans are made to the local planning authority rather than the Secretary of State and objectors will usually have the opportunity to make representations at a hearing. Revised Planning Policy Guidance Note (PPG12) "Development Plans" sets out the roles of both the Inspector and the local planning authority. It also sets out the Secretary of State's reserve powers that may be used before adoption of the development plan. Where planning permission has been refused or an enforcement notice issued by a local planning authority in relation to a particular showpeople's site, the lack of provision for such sites in the development plan for an area in which the Showmen's Guild has identified a need for them will be one of the material considerations to be taken into account in determining any appeal.

Recommendation (j)

We do not accept the view that circulars have to be re-issued by the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions in order to re-enforce them, nor that cross-referencing to other planning guidance is necessary. Far more important is demonstrating how a well-run authority has interpreted and applied the advice contained within the guidance. Either the Showmen's Guild or those involved regularly with these planning issues should consider publishing a good practice guide for the benefit of local planning authorities. The Showmen's Guild should discuss with the Local Government Association whether it would be appropriate for such a guide to be produced as a joint publication between the two organisations (paragraph 45).

The Government generally agrees with the Committee's view that the Department's Circulars do not need to be re-issued nor that cross-referencing to other planning guidance is necessary. We consider that the advice contained in Circular 22/91, if properly applied by authorities, continues to meet the needs of travelling showpeople withing the planning system. The interpretation and application of central Government policy at local level is key.


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 28 July 2000