Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 80 - 87)

TUESDAY 24 OCTOBER 2000

MR PHILLIP WARD, MR CHRIS MEGAINEY AND MS CATH SHAW

  80. Are we going to get an EU Directive on composting?
  (Mr Ward) Personally I hope not. It is very difficult to see what an EU Directive would achieve. We believe the European Commission do have ambitions in that direction, although they have not yet made it clear what they think it might do, so we are awaiting developments there.

  81. I think Peter Jones suggested to us that the Landfill Tax Credit needs to be £27 to give people a kick up the back side. Is the Government giving any consideration to giving this sort of long-term warning? The Strategy gives us targets over the next 20 years. Would it not be logical to give people a warning that the Landfill Tax Credit is going to get to something significant over that same period of time?
  (Mr Ward) That was part of the thinking in terms of the introducing of the escalator.

  82. That is pathetic, is it not, up to £15?
  (Mr Ward) I do not necessarily agree with that, but I do know it is certainly a common view in the waste industry that a much higher level of Landfill Tax is necessary in order to promote recycling. There is a dilemma buried in all of this, which is, of course, that at the moment one of the sectors who get most hit by the Landfill Tax are the local authorities. A number of authorities represent to us that the cost of paying the Landfill Tax is actually removing the resources they need for promoting recycling. There is a sort of tension there, and I flag that up. It is something that we obviously need to consider.

  83. It is all right you flagging it up, but we want the answers.
  (Mr Ward) I hope to be able to give you one, but not today, if I may. On the question of whether the Landfill Tax ought to go up more significantly, we have asked the Advisory Committee on Business and the Environment to consider this and make recommendations, and I believe they have taken evidence from a number of people, including Peter Jones. It may well be that their recommendations will point in that direction. We look forward to their report.

  84. Can I take you back to this target, or your expectation that domestic waste will increase by 3 per cent? If we were actually moving towards factor 4 and factor 10 and the manufacturers really were significantly reducing the amount of material in it, ought that not to be working in the opposite direction?
  (Mr Ward) I absolutely agree. We are now trying very hard to engage businesses in discussion about this. Indeed, the Prime Minister is speaking this morning on the environment and part of his speech, I believe, will address this question of resource efficiency and the importance of industry getting to grips with the factor 4 and factor 10 debate.

  85. So what sort of target have you got for that minimisation then?
  (Mr Ward) We do not have an explicit target. We are talking about reversing quite profound economic trends. The growth in GDP has been more or less continuous since the war. There have been one or two blips in recent years, but generally speaking the trend has been upwards. What we have not done is found a way of breaking the link between growth and waste. That is something which we are starting to do. We published last week a number of recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Consumer Products and the Environment, which is beginning to get us into the debate about how we take up with industry the question of life-cycle costs of the products they make, and how products can be designed so that they can be recycled more easily. I think we are at the very early stages of this. Clearly, long before 2020 we have to be making significant progress, otherwise the numbers become incredible. It is difficult to see how we could cope with that level of waste.

  86. It is all right saying "significant progress." What is "significant progress"?
  (Mr Ward) We have not formally turned our attention to that.

  87. Perhaps we can pursue that by letter. There are one or two other questions I think, at this stage, we could do with pursuing, but I think time means that we should finish now and we will drop you a note. Thank you very much.
  (Mr Ward) Thank you.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 21 November 2000