Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Memoranda


MEMORANDUM BY THE LANES GROUP (DSW 51)

  We are an informal community action group known collectively as LANES.

  Our special interest at this time is in the national strategy to reduce the mass and volume of organic waste by composting.

  Living and working in a largely rural and farming county we started with some practical experience and understanding of the subject. Over the past year we have carried out research at home and abroad, making use of the technical and administrative skills of our members.

  We have now considered the very large amount of information and advice from a wide variety of reliable sources including: universities, professional associations and leading specialists, commercial organisations and government bodies across Europe and North America.

  It is disappointing to find no mention in Waste Strategy 2000 on the use of waste disposal units (macerators) for discharging domestic and trade catering waste into public or private sewage systems. We believe that where capacity exists that would be far preferable to "source separation" and house to house or kerbside collection which inevitably increases air pollution and traffic problems as well as creating hygiene difficulties.

  We suggest that the requirements and inspection arrangements for containers and vehicles collecting kitchen waste for composting should be no less stringent than those for the same material collected for processing as pig swill (Stat Inst 1999 No 646 Part III).

  Careful analysis of the research papers leads us to prefer and entirely support the promotion of Home and Community Composting and "On Farm" projects. We also find merit in and commend well engineered enclosed or contained systems, "In Vessel" composting as in the Dutch example and anaerobic digestion to produce methane as practised by the Danes and others. Provided always that organic waste treatment is within the boundaries of the plant or community where it is generated.

  We are strongly opposed to the increasing use of long haul, large scale, open-air aerobic, windrow composting because:

  Hauling putriscible waste, say, county wide or across county borders defeats the good intentions of the Proximity Principle.

  Each site creates 50 to 60 extra HGV passages a day, some every day including weekends and most Bank Holidays that obviously amounts to thousands of extra and increasingly costly miles a week in total with the certainty of causing more air pollution, roadwear, congestion and accidents.

  Waste Management Licences allow the use of large open top or netted skips on the collecting lorries. These have the potential to spread plant diseases, pests and parasites en route and to transfer dominant alien species from one habitat to another.

  Planning approval allows say, 40,000 to 60,000 tonnes annual input of decomposing material to be concentrated on about 10 to 15 acres, sometimes on roadside land where emissions of the order of 50 to 75 tonnes a day add to the most significant greenhouse gases.

  Good control of aerobic composting sets optimum conditions for efficient decomposition. That creates an ideal habitat for the growth of micro-organisms including fungus. Fungi include pathogens and allergens harmful to people, livestock, wildlife or crops. Frequent lifting and turning is necessary for good management to aerate the mass of material. That causes fungal spores and fragments to be spread abroad and scattered in the wind. Some will remain aloft for days and travel many miles. They are subject to Stokes' equation and other physical factors and will not obey edicts from the Environment Agency anymore than the waves would retreat for King Canute. We are unable to verify the claim of the Composting Association that the concentration of bioaerosols reaches background level at 200 metres from the source. Some more independent people put it at 1,000 or 1,500 metres. Our own observation is that much depends on climatic conditions. It is seasonal and that is especially evident when fungus is carried with the Autumn mists. Remnants can establish new colonies on naturally decaying vegetation thus moving out more slowly but surely or they may contaminate the exposed finished compost.

  The concentration levels of bioaerosols increases in direct proportion of the size of the facility.

  Allergy is widespread affecting one in four of the population of the UK at some time in their life and the numbers are increasing by 5 per cent each year. It is estimated that 12 million of us are allergic to fungal spores such as those produced by aerobic composting. Spores do not have to be viable, fragments of colonies may be perfectly good allergens.

  Consider just one example, Aspergillus fumigatus because some work has been done on it and experts are agreed that it is a species most pathogenic and allergenic to humans. It is a natural part of our environment that can harm people, domestic and farm animals, wild life and poultry. It is a cause for concern in hospitals and when it invades the home, as well as around and about aerobic composting sites. The minimum dose to cause adverse health affects has not been established but it is known to be very low in some cases when even "background levels" can be dangerous.

  Aspergillus Sinusitis can happen in healthy people with normal immune systems and unpleasant symptoms are common but if the fungus has entered the sinuses deep inside the skull treatment using drugs and surgery together is usually successful. Those with impaired immune systems, possibly due to widely prescribed medication, may not be so fortunate.

  Aspergilloma develops in people with damaged lungs and is difficult to treat although sometimes surgical removal is possible, especially if the patient is coughing blood.

  People with damaged or impaired immune systems are especially at risk from Invasive Aspergillosis. The fungus can transfer from the lung to the brain, the eyes, the heart, the kidneys and the skin. Early diagnosis is not easy and without treatment they will die. Treatment with anti-fungal drugs is given by vein in large doses that may damage the kidney and other organs. Many do not survive.

  There is a cost to all this and we may, in this case, learn from the USA statistics where Allergenic Rhinits affects 10 per cent of the adult population. Over 600 million dollars are spent annually on management of the disease. That does not include the cost of two million lost work days, three million lost school days and 28 million days of decreased productivity from the symptoms of the disease or the side effects of the medication. Aspergillus has an important role as a causative agent.

  The risk to the health of people living, working or passing in the vicinity of these sites cannot be assessed because no satisfactory dose response data is available for the pathogens and allergens that are undoubtedly present.

  We suggest that the Precautionary Principle should be invoked at National level.

  Using a hazardous process to make a product that is not healthy but may be handled by domestic gardeners or horticultural workers and having stocks unsold or returned to landfill is not a sustainable answer to the imperative to meet our targets.

  People are usually aware of the problem of smell associated with composting yet in 1996 planning approval was given for a 40,000 tonne site in Surrey. Councillors thought they were doing a good thing and were assured by the contractor that there would be no smell beyond the boundary. Complaints are documented from 1997 and continue despite a change of contractor and installation of a deodorising spray system. The system has an unfortunate tendency to spray people riding their bicycles on the road. From Hilburn, Rockland County, NY, we learn of a system of elaborate bio-filters and discharge stacks with pretreatment scrubbers and a chemical feed system yet the nearest people still keep over 1,000 feet away.

  Well intentioned people assume that composting, being an essentially natural process is inherently benign, however, when intensified and accelerated on an industrial scale in the open air, it has harmful effects which do not arise or do not present a problem using the methods we note as preferred or commended.

  We respectfully suggest that further guidance is needed and propose the following requirements for planning approval and the issue of waste management licences for open air windrow composting.

    (1)  It should not be permitted within 1,000 metres of any residence or workplace or any enclosure or building housing animals (including poultry).

    (2)  Input of putriscible material should be limited to 15,000 tonnes a year for each site.

    (3)  The haulage distances for each site should be limited to 10 miles making collection from 314 square miles possible.

    (4)  The statutory requirements and inspection arrangements for the collection and transportation of kitchen waste for composting should be no less stringent than those dealing with material to be processed for pig swill.

  From the trends we have noted elsewhere we believe that if some of the saving on landfill tax can be used to help develop the preferred and commended systems they will more than compensate for these constraints.

September 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 24 October 2000