Select Committee on European Scrutiny Thirteenth Report


STRATEGIES FOR JOBS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY


(21001)
6193/00
COM(00) 48

Commission Communication: Strategies for jobs in the Information
Society.
Legal base:
Document originated: 4 February 2000
Forwarded to the Council: 7 February 2000
Deposited in Parliament: 23 February 2000
Department: Trade and Industry
Basis of consideration: EM of 10 March 2000
Previous Committee Report: None
Discussed in Council: Special European Council 23-24 March 2000
Committee's assessment: Politically important
Committee's decision: Not cleared; further information requested

The Commission's aims

  10.1  This document was prepared for the Special European Council on Employment, Economic Reform and Social Cohesion — Towards a Europe based on Innovation and Knowledge, in Lisbon on 23-24 March 2000. The Commission describes it as serving as an important contribution to, and support for, the eEurope initiative which is designed to enhance Europe's readiness for the digital era.[35] It sees the report as widening the perspective from job opportunities to job strategies, building on successful initiatives in Member States and stressing the strong linkage between enhancing Europe's response to the Information Society and fostering employment in Europe.

The report

  10.2  The Commission provides a number of statistics to support its identification of weaknesses in exploitation of the Internet in the EU, where the penetration rate is still only one third of that of the United States. Most of these weaknesses are already well known, such as the short average time spent on-line in the EU. It also notes that there has been a rapid increase in demand for highly skilled employees in the telecommunications, software and services sectors. It forecasts that the shortfall of IT specialists in western Europe could reach 1.6 million by 2002. The Commission reports that the vast majority of big European companies feel impeded by the lack of skills and that the shortage is even more serious for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

  10.3  By comparison with the United States, the Commission says that investment in early stage technology is still much more limited in Europe, though European information and communication technologies (ICTs) have benefited from growing investment and this is now the largest sector for venture capitalists.

  10.4  Looking ahead to the opportunities and challenges presented by the Information Society, the Commission suggests that by 2010 half of all jobs will be in industries that are either major producers or intensive users of information technology products and services.

  10.5  In the four main areas examined — learning, working, Public Services and enterprises — the paper provides examples of best practice across the EU. These include:

  • a partnership set up by the Federal Government in Germany with Deutsche Telecom to link 8000 schools to the Internet, co-funded at regional level, and the UK's National Grid for Learning. In Portugal, a similar programme has connected all 5-12 Grade schools to the Internet, as well as to all public libraries;

  • the use of the European Computer Driving Licence (ECDL), a standardised and recognised certification of competence which is a useful tool for businesses, educational bodies and the voluntary sector to establish computer literacy. Den Danske Bank has agreed to give a computer at a much reduced price to any of its 14,000 staff who pass at least four of the seven modules of the ECDL within one year;

  • Portuguese citizens can deal with the Government via e-mail and over 100 administrative procedures, such as issuing driving licences and registering births, can be done on-line;

  • the Greek Ministry of Finance is pilot-testing a system of electronic filing, processing and payment of quarterly VAT tax forms.

  10.6  The paper concludes by setting out 18 recommendations within the four main areas and suggests target dates, linked to indicators for measuring success rates. For instance, under the heading of Learning in the Information Society, it suggests that the Member States should support content development networks in the educational sector. The target date is end 2002 and the indicator would be the rate of growth of content development networks.

  10.7  The recommendations are summarised by the Commission as follows:

Learning (all by end 2002)

  • link every school to the Internet
  • increase multimedia capability of school PCs
  • ensure teachers' competence in information society (IS) skills
  • develop the capability to integrate IS tools in education
  • support IS tools and multimedia integration within curricula through public private partnerships
  • support content development networks in the educational sector

Working

  • provide all workers with the opportunity to achieve IS literacy (end 2003)
  • create conditions for teleworking to take place on wide scale (end 2000)
  • increase uptake and capacity of third level education (end 2003)
  • promote IT courses at second level including industry-certified training (from 2000)
  • ensure that user-friendly standards are employed to improve the employability of people with disabilities (from 2000)

Public Services

  • set up pages providing information about civil rights and linking to relevant public services (end 2000)
  • make electronically accessible all public services capable of this (end 2004)
  • provide one-stop Internet shop for businesses (end 2000)
  • set up public Internet access points, also offering training (end 2001)

Enterprise

  • encourage entrepreneurship through fiscal policies (end 2000)
  • enhance industry-research collaboration (2002)
  • mainstream the IS needs of SMEs in public programmes (from 2000)
  • diffuse best practice and benchmark use of ICT by companies (end 2002)

The Government's view

  10.8  The Minister for Small Business and E-Commerce (Ms Patricia Hewitt) says that the Government can support the general thrust of the Communication, but that its chief concern is that this risks encouraging a proliferation of Internet-related targets, because it covers areas which are also the subject of targets in the eEurope initiative. The Government believes that the eEurope strategy would develop more strongly if:

    "... the Commission were to give more attention initially to the three areas which are fundamental, namely reducing Internet access costs; accelerating e-commerce, mainly through completing the legal framework; and ensuring a good level of skills. Early progress in these areas is essential to provide a strong foundation for the other matters covered in these Communications. The Learning and Working elements of the present Communication add detail to what is already in eEurope on skills for pupils, businesses, citizens and others. The Enterprise and Public Services elements also add targets and detail to eEurope, but may make it more difficult to achieve an overall approach that has consistency and impact."

  10.9  However, the Minister says:

    "... although this Communication was intended to complement eEurope, the two have targets which may contradict one another. For example, eEurope aims that all schools be on-line by the end of 2001, while this Communication states a target of end of 2002. As the initiative develops, there may be an increasing need to ensure coherence, so that the Commission and Member States do not sign up to differing targets for the same action. It may also be necessary to ensure that the targets are more appropriate and demanding: for example, achieving a given ratio of PCs/pupil may be more suitable than linking every school to the Internet."

Conclusion

  10.10  Whilst the examples of best practice in the Communication are interesting, we see little real value in the rest of this paper and its exhortations. The Minister's analysis of what is required of Member States is, in our view, more penetrating.

  10.11  We have invited the Minister to give oral evidence to us, when we hope to hear from the Minister what contribution the Commission has been able to make to and what has been included in the Action Plan on the eEurope initiative. Meanwhile, we do not clear this document, but ask the Minister to highlight for us any significant agreement reached at the Special European Council on the ingredients of the eEurope initiative Action Plan.


35  (20858) 14205/99; see HC 23-viii (1999-2000), paragraph 7 (9 February 2000). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 26 April 2000