Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 17

Memorandum submitted by Mr Robert Fisk, The Independent

Thank you for your letter of 29 July, inviting me to submit a written memorandum of evidence on the foreign policy lessons of the Kosovo crisis. Your letter was forwarded to me in Lebanon where it awaited my return from an outside assignment; and I'm afraid the deadline for submission has already passed.

  However, I feel I have little to add to the many articles I have written on the subject of Kosovo. In short, I believe that:

    (1)  When Kosovo might have been "solvablè—at the time of the 1995 Dayton summit—we refused to address the Kosovo Albanian grievances since we wanted Mr Milosevic on our side in the Bosnian settlement.

    (2)  That the recent Kosovo war was made inevitable by that part of the Rambouillet peace annex which demanded that the Serbs allow NATO access to all roads, railways, airports, radio stations, etc, throughout all of Yugoslavia. This annex effectively called for NATO occupation of all Serbia and was bound to be rejected—and was thus bound to lead to war. After the NATO bombardment, the demands in this annex were quietly abandoned, having presumably served their purpose. Yet no real discussion has ever taken place—either in parliament or in the press—on this critical issue.

    (3)  That an enormous increase in Serb atrocities was inevitable after NATO began its bombardment (the Yugoslav army warned that it would "settle accounts" if NATO went to war). NATO then changed its war aims, claiming that bombardment was being carried out to return to their homes the Kosovo Albanian refugees—most of whom were in their homes when the war began.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 7 June 2000