Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 41 - 59)

TUESDAY 13 JUNE 2000

MR JAMES HARDING, MR GRAHAM HUTCHINGS AND MS LORNA BALL

Chairman

  41. Can I welcome our witnesses. You are all experienced journalists, we look to you to help us to understand what is happening in China as I understand all of you have spent some time living there. I thought I would begin by asking each of you to comment on a text. Some of you may have been here when we had Professor Yahuda and his colleagues. He said that Communist Party control is in contradiction with the way the economy is moving, that a closed society has as its enemy the internet, all the imperatives of a modern commercial system. Do you agree with this?

  (Mr Hutchings) I agree fundamentally with it but I think it is a mistake to move from that premise to the conclusion that the party state system in China is either close to collapse or will be so in the next ten years or so. Indeed, I think the contradiction stems ultimately between human nature and the desire to suppress it which applies everywhere it has been practised. It applies particularly in China because of some of the traditional views of authority, the traditional respect for great leaders, the traditional desire of Chinese people for a teacher, the insistence of Chinese central governments of every hue that authority is indivisible, ie not necessarily parcelled up into legislative, executive or judicial branches, so that you have here on a grand scale, on a cosmic scale, the kind of contradiction you refer to.

  42. Mr Harding, any contradiction between political control and economic needs?
  (Mr Harding) Not long after I arrived in China someone explained my job to me very simply as a foreign correspondent in Shanghai and that was to distinguish between the official reality and the real reality. This gap widens and narrows and it is not the case that it stretches to a breaking point. I think I would probably agree with Mr Hutchings. I do think in areas that have been talked about this morning it is very important. The fact that you mentioned the internet, that is a key area where you are breaking down what has been a tight government lock on information and forms of expression. One example of how complicated that is for the government is that in the recent State Council Directive on how they are going to manage news information flow on the internet, the State Council's judgment is that only news that has already been printed in the press can be published on the internet. If you can imagine how untenable that position is, it shows you the real challenge they face in managing to maintain official reality in the hearts and minds of Chinese people. This is a growing gap. What is significant about it looking ahead is not that this means a sudden or immediate rupture in the future of the Chinese Communist Party as the government of China, but what is significant about it is that it is gradually eroding their control and they are giving up more and more parts of the economy and more and more parts of society to real reality, to social forces and economic forces that are beyond their control.
  (Ms Ball) I would agree wholeheartedly with what both Mr Harding and Mr Hutchings have just said. To take what Mr Harding has just said one step further on the internet, e-commerce, of course, is growing and it is important to this country, to Europe, to the United States and also to China. The Chinese authorities face the contradiction of wanting the economic growth that may bring but at the same time desire to control the free flow of information still. So there are controls about what can be put on the internet and what sites on the internet are given access as well.

  43. Currently they are seeking to get a single portal with guards at each door?
  (Ms Ball) It is like an intranet for China.

  44. With a small door.
  (Ms Ball) Where the government controls the ISP, the internet service provider, that people have access to.

  45. How long can that last?
  (Ms Ball) That is a very good question. I would say that it is like trying to put your finger in a dam. In other words, at some point it will no longer be able to control that sort of information. This is early days of the growth of on-line in China.

  46. Any further comments on the internet?
  (Mr Harding) I think they cannot control this and this terrifies them. There is a wonderful collection of young internet engineers at Beijing University right in the heartland who set up a business getting around the blocks and the dam walls created to try to prevent information coming into China. I think they are going to have great difficulty in creating a great wall against the internet.

  47. A great wall!
  (Ms Ball) I think one further point to add about the media is that the Chinese media, although it has its drawbacks and it is controlled, is very lively and competitive compared to what it used to be. It is not the dull or boring stuff that used to be there 15 or 20 years ago, it is full of quizzes, soaps, phone-ins, the sorts of things that we would recognise. That has produced the contradiction that you have alluded to on the economic side. On the media side, if you want to control information, as soon as you have made your media lively and attractive, and Chinese media carries adverts, it means there is another control of the media which is nothing to do with the government but everything to do with economic success. If your television station or your radio station or, indeed, your internet site is dependent in large part on money gained from advertising it means that the programmes and information you give must be attractive. That can lead to this contradiction that we have been talking about between control and what is required in China.

Dr Starkey

  48. Can I ask a supplementary on what you have been saying and then I will ask the question I wanted to ask. Does what you have been talking about apply to the whole of China or only to certain bits of it? Is it going to spread into the regions? Is it likely that China will be moving to a situation of increasing disparity? Will the instability come from the regions left behind or the regions that are going ahead?
  (Ms Ball) Are we talking about economic disparity?

  49. Yes, and obviously access to information, the whole bag really.
  (Mr Hutchings) Economic disparities have been perhaps the most striking feature in strictly economic terms to emerge from the reforms begun 20 years ago. It is very evident if you are in, for example, the remote North Western Province of Gansu compared with Shanghai, where I believe you will be fortunate to spend some time, where you will be struck—it would be a dull souled pilgrim who would not be—by the skyscrapers and the appearances of modern life that are in that extraordinary city. You would be struck in a different kind of way were you able to spend a few days in Lanzhou or the cities and towns outside Lanzhou, the capital of Gansu. This is a very serious problem and one that the government has tried to address, without very much success to date, but is now redoubling its efforts with the strategy known as the Developed Central and Western China Strategy. I dare say your hosts will present you with some information about ways in which they intend to raise living standards, which they regard as a central feature of human rights, in Central and West China by having tax breaks, sinking government money in, building roads, schools, encouraging foreign investment and, indeed, encouraging foreign countries, Britain included, to set up consulates-general and so forth in the west. So it is a very serious problem, one that leads to tensions that the government is hoping to ameliorate.
  (Ms Ball) If I can just add something on the media side. Graham is quite right on the economic disparities and the new programme especially to develop the west, which is foremost in the Chinese government's mind at the moment. On the media side, the further you get away from Beijing in particular sometimes the centre can seem far away and that is sometimes still the case in China in my experience. Radio stations in particular who are meant to be funded by the government have had that funding withdrawn, sometimes up to 90 per cent. So quite a large radio station or television station will find that 90 per cent of its budget has suddenly gone and they must make up that money through advertising, as I said before. You spoke about the disparity when it will reach the regions. Sometimes when it comes to that sort of control over the media, the regions can be slightly ahead of an area that is more tightly controlled like Beijing or, indeed, Shanghai. I do not want to overstate that because there is a lot of information that is available in Beijing and Shanghai in particular but one should not simply see the regions as being far behind on every count.

  50. The main question I wanted to ask is we talked a lot in the first session about relations between Britain and China and I would be interested in knowing where China sees itself in the world in relation to other countries. Who does China regard as its allies and friends and which states does it regard as clients?
  (Mr Hutchings) A way to approach this is not just to look at what the Chinese government says or what we think the Chinese government believes but to approach it from the point of view of Chinese men and women whom one might meet in the course of one's work or life in Beijing and ask these questions: who are the instinctive comparators; who do the Chinese compare themselves with when they compare their own country and its achievements with those of others? You might think from GDP levels, from its position in the economic development cycle, that India would be a natural choice, Vietnam perhaps, other developing countries, but that is not the case. It is the West and it is specifically America. Britain is seen to be an advanced and, to some extent, different power from America but essentially to be subsumed within the American category and vision. The Chinese leaders, in my view, have a rather similar view, they are genuinely representative of their people in this respect, that the natural comparators are the rich countries, the powerful countries, particularly the powerful countries able to assert themselves both in terms of bilateral relations and particularly in international organisations. Everywhere you look practically on the Chinese diplomatic, political and economic agenda they encounter as obstacle or grudging ally the United States of America. As we have heard this morning, since they are inheritors of a view about themselves which is exceedingly immodest, ie that they are at the centre of the world, small wonder that they regard themselves as the natural adversary of the United States of America whose position they would like to supplant.

  51. Allies and clients, you have not mentioned any at all.
  (Mr Harding) This is a hugely interesting question because Jiang Zemin has made it his business to manage the foreign policy of China. While there has been a frenzy of activity in the last two years in terms of the number of visits, when you speak to your hosts, and I imagine you will see people from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and discuss with them the volume of dignitaries they are hosting through Beijing it is a remarkable management operation and yet at the same time where are the allies and where are the real relationships? I would argue that Jiang Zemin has had a real difficulty in creating any real relationships with major powers. If you look at Russia there were frequent meetings between him and Yeltsin but there was no real economic basis for that relationship and there were clearly competing strategic interests between both Russia and China vis a vis relationships with the US. The relationship with India was always pretty lukewarm and obviously deteriorated after the missile testing. The relationship with the US has been continually dogged by human rights issues, rightly, and by the Tibet question and also by conflicting opinions within the US about trade and WTO. The visit by President Clinton actually served as a lightning rod for those feelings to some extent and the embassy bombing has once again identified how isolated China is. The remarkable feature here, and I suppose this is where Europe and the UK comes in, is actually how needy China is of strong relationships with the West and with Europe and with the UK rather than what one might expect to be a very strong set of relationships and allies.

  52. You have not mentioned Japan. I do not know if Ms Ball wants to bring that in?
  (Mr Harding) All I would say is that obviously Japan and Korea are problems left over from history. They are not natural allies but if they can be economic partners that is a good start.
  (Ms Ball) I think that will be the first way in which they would view Japan. I do not think one can under-estimate the problems of history that James has referred to. There is a big dislike of Japan that is inherited from the Second World War.

  53. Korea?
  (Mr Hutchings) I was going to say there is a very incestuous, but that is not the right word, a very peculiar relationship with North Korea. You will have learned the successor to Kim Il-sung made his first foreign visit since appointment and he did so in terms of a secret rail journey to Beijing immediately before the summit that is taking place now. The other way to consider this I suppose is what is it in the personality and the character of Chinese leaders that other countries might admire or find agreeable or easy to get on with? What is it in terms of the charm and spontaneity that we recognise as being an ingredient of diplomatic relations even amongst adversaries and political opponents? What is it in the particular national policies of China which encourage admiration, reverence or perhaps even grudging respect on the part of other countries? What is there in their system that might appeal even—I use the word perhaps ill-advisedly—to less developed states in the world? I think the answer in all cases is there is very little.

Sir John Stanley

  54. Ms Ball, with your World Service hat on could you set out for the Committee what you consider to be the main impediments to people in China accessing the World Service and how far are those impediments created by the Chinese government's restrictions on frequencies and other technical means and how far are those impediments created by lack of funding of the China service by the BBC here?
  (Ms Ball) There are many ways to answer that. First of all, I should say straight away that if you want to access the BBC in China, whether it is listening to the radio, the shortwave radio, or whether it is accessing the BBC on-line site it is very difficult from China to do that. The shortwave frequencies into China that come from the BBC are jammed. Not all of them all of the time but some of them all of the time are jammed. You can listen to the radio but it requires re-tuning your radio and a bit of fiddle-faddle which increasingly in a competitive market people may not be prepared to do. The BBC on-line site in China, and we were talking before about ISPs, China's desire to control them, if you type in a BBC address on the net in China it will be blocked because of software that the Chinese government uses. There is a way around that, it is quite easy to sidestep that, but nevertheless you must know how to do so. These two impediments to accessing the BBC affect our ability to reach our audience in China. However, I think it would be wrong of me to say that is the whole story. It is also true, as I have already mentioned, that the media in China as far as we are concerned is quite competitive and it is attractive, it is sophisticated, it appeals to its audience, especially now that it has the economic incentive to do so. In most countries in the world when the media is deregulated there is much less control and there is much more competition as outsiders come in as well but in China we are hit with a double-whammy, the domestic media is much more competitive but we are blocked out from taking part in that competition. That would also be a reason why we find it difficult to access our audience. Also in the past the BBC has done programmes that the Chinese authorities have not liked and as a direct consequence of that our access into China has been more controlled, more difficult. Our correspondents who are based in Beijing have to receive permission to travel if it is a reporting trip and recently that permission has been quite forthcoming. I think our relationship with the Chinese authorities has become more constructive, if I can put it that way, which gives us better access into China. It has been the case in the past when I have tried to get Chinese BBC journalists into China, it has not been possible for me to get them into China but in the last couple of years I have been able to do that. Our access has improved somewhat.

  55. Thank you. I know that BBC World Television is actually outside your immediate area but it is a source of continuing interest as far as this Committee is concerned. Have you any comments you can make to us as to whether BBC World Television is making any progress at all towards getting back satellite television access to China from which of course it was dispossessed by the Murdoch empire with the Chinese government's active enthusiasm?
  (Ms Ball) Including, alas, a section of my own department because we had a Chinese television service as well.

Chairman

  56. I am sorry, I missed that.
  (Ms Ball) I said including, alas, a section of my own department at the time because the Chinese service also had a television department that beamed programmes into China which also had to finish. BBC World Television in English is now available in many hotel rooms in China but at the moment it does not have an official licence to do that. We are hopeful, and I can only speak in more general, optimistic terms, that a licence will be forthcoming. The BBC will be asking the Chinese authorities for such a licence in the next few months. Two weeks ago the Chinese Culture Minister was over here and spoke in fairly constructive terms about the relationship between the BBC and China. We live in hope that licence will be granted.

  57. That is into hotels, what about into people's homes? Is there any means of picking up BBC World?
  (Ms Ball) You could do if you had the satellite receiving dish to do so but the signal is encrypted so you must have the right satellite receiving dish.

  58. With a de-encryption device?
  (Ms Ball) Yes.

  59. It is probably a criminal offence to have one, is it?
  (Ms Ball) In China you need permission anyway to have a satellite receiving dish, so if you need a special one with the encryption device for the BBC that permission will be denied I think.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 29 November 2000