Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 6

Memorandum submitted by Processing and Packaging Machinery Association (PPMA)

  The PPMA has only dealt with FCO "on the ground", as it were, in Hong Kong and China. Our main contacts have been with DTI (now British Trade International) and CBBC. We opened our own office in Shanghai during 1999 with the aid of DTI Sector Challenge funding.

  During our various visits to establish the liaison office in Shanghai, we called upon the support of the Consulates in Hong Kong, Beijing and Shanghai. Our main contacts were with the Commercial Officers at these posts. The Consul General in Shanghai also attended the official opening ceremony for our office last July and participated in the talks with local governmental chiefs. He was most helpful and supportive.

  It is clear that there is a limit to the assistance posts can offer to SMEs, due to the size of the market, its complexity and the rather "juicer" prizes on offer for larger companies in the fields of aerospace, telecommunications, water and civil engineering.

  We have found that our local contacts have been more productive in helping us to become more visible. But we readily acknowledge, with gratitude, the funding which has made the development of these contacts possible.

  It is always difficult for Posts to provide in-depth knowledge and I believe their role as a facilitator is much more important to SME sectors.

  On the general political level, the FCO and others are very useful in advising on protocol and local business practices.

  I must tell you that I come from the Patten school rather than the Sir Percy Craddock school when it comes to dealing with the Chinese.

  Every respect must be shown to the status of the Chinese contact, and their customs and practices in social and business dealings. In particular, the issue of "loss of face" should not be underestimated.

  However, the Chinese are very adept at hiding behind this "bamboo curtain" when it suits them and sometimes a direct and stubborn approach can reap rewards (staying polite at all times!).

  At the end of the day China is desperate to update its technology and needs the West to achieve this aim. So we should not undersell our value to them. However, we also have to appreciate our Taiwanese, Japanese, American and European competitors are very aggressive in the market.

  Many questions are asked about our view of Chinese human rights, and as I employ a Chinese national it is interesting to learn their perspective on these issues.

  Generally, I believe they understand the massacre in Tianamen Square in 1989 was a big mistake. However, there is a general acceptance that a big country with a huge population needs strict controls, and they are willing to accept some harsh rules and regulations in return for the stability and certainty which the Government regime has brought. One only has to look at the Manchu regime it replaced to understand their perspective.

  I believe the best way to bring "democracy" to the Chinese is through the continuous contacts and development of business relations which are now happening. In 1980 there were only 400 foreign nationals in Shanghai. I think the current count is about 40,000.

  It is clear that the Chinese Government will pressurise the West to grant as many concessions as it can, the carrot being access to their markets.

  China is very much a Who You Know society, and I believe the major role of FCO is to ensure we do know the right people and the structures of industry sectors and their decision making processes. Quicker market intelligence is also vital and an area where we are notably slower than our competitors.

  With the Hong Kong issue receding, I believe those UK companies and sectors who treat China seriously could find many opportunities. If, as has been reported recently, the current regime makes way for a new Order in 2002 the process of liberalisation and market access will gather pace. The FCO should be ensuring that as many businesses as possible are in position to take advantage of this when it happens.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 29 November 2000