Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Minutes of Evidence



MEMORANDUM BY THE FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE

THE FOURTH EURO-MEDITERRANEAN FOREIGN MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE, MARSEILLES, 15-16 NOVEMBER 2000

  1.  This memorandum responds to the Committee's request for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office's view of the recent Euro-Mediterranean Ministerial in Marseilles on 15-16 November. It reports discussion at the Ministerial and the UK's view of the meeting. Presidency conclusions are attached.

  2.  The Foreign Secretary represented the UK at the fourth Ministerial meeting of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (or "Barcelona Process") in Marseilles. The process, inaugurated in 1995, brings together the EU with twelve partners: Turkey, Cyprus, Malta, Israel, and the Mediterranean Arab States (less Libya) plus Jordan and the Palestinian Authority. However, for this meeting, Syria and Lebanon stayed away in protest at Israeli action in the Middle East. The Libyan Foreign Minister attended as a "special guest of the Presidency". Yemen, Mauritania and the Arab Maghreb Union were present as observers.

  3.  The Ministerial focussed on the three chapters of the Barcelona process: political, economic, and social/cultural. It based its work on the Commission's September 2000 Communication COM(2000) 497, Reinvigorating the Barcelona Process.

POLITICAL ISSUES

  4.  Events in the Middle East dominated the political discussion. The Presidency added a session on this at short notice straight after the formal opening ceremony, with discussion continuing over dinner with only Ministers present. The Palestinian Authority, Israel, Jordan and Egypt made strong but measured statements expressing deep concern about the current situation and calling for an end to the violence and a resumption of formal negotiations. Both the Palestinians and the Israelis expressed appreciation for the help and support the EU has given to the peace process.

  5.  Looking to the future, Ministers agreed on the need to keep building political dialogue and co-operation among the 27 partners. The main political issue was to have been the adoption of a "Charter for Peace and Stability", providing for political and security co-operation between the 27 partners. Although the current political situation meant this was not possible, we hope that work towards this goal will resume when the political situation permits.

ECONOMIC ISSUES

  6.  Discussion of the economic chapter focused on the importance of providing new impetus towards the Process's key goal in this area: a Euro-Mediterranean Free Trade Area by 2010. Ministers generally agreed that partners needed to do more to liberalise their economies and make them more attractive to foreign investment, including agreeing free trade agreements amongst themselves as well as with the EU. In this respect, the announcement that Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia were planning to create a sub-regional free trade area was particularly welcomed. For its part, the EU needed to ratify Association Agreements more quickly. The UK pressed particularly for more generous agricultural access to EU markets.

  7.  The EU also confirmed that the indicative figure for the new MEDA regulation over the period 2000-06 would be ?5.35 billion, and that the new regulation would allow for swifter, more effective disbursement of funds. The EU also expressed its aspiration that MEDA funds would be more closely linked to the Association Agreements with EuroMed partners.

SOCIAL/CULTURAL ISSUES

  8.  Discussion of the social, human and cultural chapter revealed broad agreement that co-operation had to be made more effective. This should include involving civil society and developing, as the Commission has suggested, two new regional programmes in 2001: on social and JHA issues. The JHA programme would tackle organised crime, judicial administration and migration, including the social inclusion of lawful migrants to the EU. Specific proposals for reinvigorating the chapter (in addition to those in the conclusions) included a meeting of health ministers next year (Italy), a summit on the information society in 2003 (Tunisia) and a "Year of the Mediterranean" in 2002 (Morocco).

CONCLUSIONS

  9.  The formal conclusions (which are issued on the responsibility of the Presidency) were circulated towards the end of the meeting. The language on the Middle East Peace Process had been discussed informally earlier in the day.

UK VIEWS

  10.  The meeting was a successful, and useful, stocktake of the Barcelona Process. The fact that Ministers were able to discuss all aspects of Barcelona, at a tense period in the Middle East, is a tribute to the importance of the Process and to the French Presidency's handling of the Ministerial. Overall, Ministers generally took the view that, while the Process had some useful achievements to its credit, renewed impetus was needed if it was to stay on track for its ambitious goals.

  11.  A French language copy of the conclusions is attached. An English version will be forwarded to the Committee as soon as it is available.

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

17 November 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 22 November 2000