Select Committee on Home Affairs First Report



THE GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSALS

7. The consultation paper was produced jointly by the Home Office and the Department of Health in July 1999. The proposals cover changes to the law, administrative action, medical research and allocation of additional resources. Options A and B are presented as two groups but most of the proposals apply to both options. The proposed changes in the law cover both amendment of existing criminal law and the introduction of a new civil court order. They provide for a compulsory assessment process, the power to detain people assessed as dangerous and facilities for accommodating those detained.

Proposals common to both options
(a) Greater use of existing powers to award discretionary life sentences
(b) Extending range of offences for which discretionary life sentences can be given
(c) New powers of remand for specialist assessment
(d) New powers for compulsory detention, supervision and recall
Option A
(e) Removing treatability requirement for admission to psychiatric hospital
(f) Improving existing services within prisons and hospitals
Option B
(g) New specialist service separate from but linked to prisons and hospitals
(h) New civil court order for detention

Government Proposals

8. At the heart of these proposals is a revised assessment process for deciding whether someone with a severe personality disorder is dangerous. The assessment might last six or more weeks and the individual would be held securely during that time. Many of the people affected will already be in custody. Some will undergo this assessment after conviction for a serious offence and before sentence. Assessment at this point would provide better information on which a judge could base the sentence. The Home Office considers that this may encourage greater use of the discretionary life sentence. Others will be assessed while in prison and prior to any decision being taken on their release (either from a discretionary life sentence or at the end of a fixed/determinate sentence). Those living in the community may have to be detained against their will to undergo such an assessment. This would only happen if such an assessment was recommended by a local panel comprising the medical professions, social workers, the police and probation officers. Such Multi-Agency Risk Panels (MARP) have already been established to help manage sex offenders and potentially dangerous offenders.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 14 March 2000