Select Committee on Home Affairs First Report



SCENARIOS

75. It is said that the criminal justice system operates on the principle enunciated by William Blackstone that "It is better that ten guilty escape than one innocent suffer".[74] The requirements of public protection in relation to dangerous people with severe personality disorder may be that several people have to be detained in order to prevent one being a risk to members of the public. In our view the best case scenario, if these proposals are implemented, would be as follows:

additional resources provide better facilities and more staff to manage dangerous people with severe personality disorder in a secure and therapeutic environment
further scientific research produces improved assessment tools with which psychiatrists can more reliably diagnose severe personality disorder and better assess the risk to the public posed by an individual
recent legal developments have ensured that most dangerous individuals with severe personality disorder are sentenced to discretionary life sentences where their release is subject to review and eventual supervision
new powers enable the retention of those who have completed fixed prison sentences but who are assessed as remaining a danger to the public
individuals living in the community are recommended for assessment by local panels (including doctors, social workers and the police) but better resources and improved assessment mean that the powers of detention are used only in a few cases where there is concensus among all parties about the need for detention
methods of assessment and decision command almost universal respect and are not successfully challenged under the ECHR
no members of the public are killed by dangerous people with severe personality disorder
no individuals are shown to have been wrongly detained.

Best case scenario

76. It is easy to imagine how things might not work out as well in practice. A worst case scenario might be:

further research fails to produce sufficiently robust assessment methods, so professionals within the system continue to lack confidence in their ability to predict dangerousness
over-caution leads to a large number of individuals being kept in prison at the end of their sentences
lack of resources and shortage of staff make it hard for people to be detained in a therapeutic environment
challenges before the ECHR lead to some individuals having to be released because they cannot be given any treatment
large sums of compensation are paid to those wrongly detained under flawed assessment processes
a person detained for assessment but not judged sufficiently dangerous to be detained indefinitely commits an horrific killing.

Worst case scenario


74  Commentaries on the Laws of England, book iv, p27. Back

 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 14 March 2000