Select Committee on Home Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 120 - 139)

TUESDAY 17 OCTOBER 2000

MRS BRIONI ARMYTAGE, REVEREND JOHN BOURNE, MS FRANCOISE FLETCHER, REVEREND DAVID ADKINS, MR RALPH DELLOW AND MR MICHAEL DUFF

  120. Reverend Adkins?
  (Rev Adkins) I have not had experience of the Prison Service since the raid but prior to the raid I came here a number of times. I am an ex-police officer, too. I spent 25 years in the Metropolitan Police, and I was on the team that arrested the Kray Twin gang, so I have experience with prisoners and the like. So to come here was quite a culture shock for me because I had been in closed prisons where there was an awful atmosphere. To come here and see the respect there was on both sides, and the fact they did seem to work together so very clearly, and the governor was willing to let his men come out to the church and do work, I was so impressed with these men because they could be trusted. They had a keen sense of self-discipline, by that time, instilled in them and they work exceedingly hard. One Christmas we were hard put to staff a place for the homeless—a homeless shelter. They totally staffed it for a week and, actually, the money came out of their own pockets to pay for some of the food—turkeys and so on. It was not asked for, they actually volunteered. It was brilliantly done. I have stayed friends with four men, in particular, who worked so well in the church. They are now out of prison and they have not re-offended. Some of them are still working in the church, I am in contact with all of them, and I am proud to call them friends. They do mix with my family. I think the work the previous governor did is brilliant.

Mrs Dean

  121. Can I turn to Francoise Fletcher and her colleagues from the education department and ask what changes there have been, or are planned, to be made in the education department, with particular reference to the lack of photography now?
  (Ms Fletcher) Yes. That is a good question. We do not know what changes are planned for us. The governor who is in charge of education at the moment has told me several times "If it is not working you do not need to mend it". The governor in charge of security tells me the education programme is going to be changed totally, and this has been said to me several times. As a result of it I have absolutely no idea what is planned. What has changed is that in the past the programme of education was discussed and negotiated with the head of inmate activities. Now, the programme is imposed, pretty much as the photography class was cancelled. The photography class was cancelled on the Friday. I was told "This class is closed. There is no discussion." The previous Monday—the Monday of the same week—the Governor, Mr Bartlett, had asked me to explain what the photography class was about, how the accreditation was gained and how we were keeping track of the cameras, and so on. I explained it all to him. I brought one of the booklets that the men have, because this class is accredited, and, in fact, I was told on the same day "This is fine, there is no problem". On Friday I am told "Close it". No discussion. Since then I have been told "It has gone. Do not even talk about it". Now this is a class where, this year, men were accredited not only at level 1 but up to level 3. We have had, in the past, a number of men who have discovered photography here and gone on to higher education and finding jobs involving photography and doing degrees. We also, as was mentioned before, were represented at the Koestler Awards. I went to the awards this year and there was a photography section. I questioned the reasons why the class was closed. I was told the class was closed for security reasons. Reasonable alternatives, in my mind, were offered. For example, the photography tutor would dedicate the first hour of each of his sessions to going round taking pictures and then coming back, the cameras would be taken away from the men and, therefore, nobody would have a camera in-hand, or if, because of the nature of the work required, (at times they have to take pictures early in the morning, or late at night, or different times of the day), I would have gone with the men and the cameras would never have been out of my sight, and then taken away again from the men. This I was told "No discussion. The class is closed. There is no negotiation".

  122. What you are saying is that other prisons have photography classes?
  (Ms Fletcher) Yes. Not many, I gather.
  (Mr Duff) Wandsworth.
  (Ms Fletcher) Wandsworth has a class. Certainly, photography was represented at the Koestler Awards, so there are photography classes at other establishments.
  (Mr Duff) We have won the Koestler Awards practically every year—in fact, every year. We also had a student who won a national competition, and I took him up to London to present him with his prize—all those kinds of achievements. What puzzles me is that I ran the photography class for seven years and there was never a problem with security. The rules were tightened up at one point because worries were expressed about security, but we made that work and, as Francoise has said, we were quite willing to tighten up even more, if necessary.

Chairman

  123. Mr Duff, did any of these classes lead to jobs where people used photography, or was it for other reasons?
  (Mr Duff) Yes. One chap is working, I believe, for the national press now. We had a chap who went to Greenwich to do media studies at degree level. Various people have used photography to enhance other work as well. So it kind of spreads out. Also, we found that people came into photography because they found it a friendly subject, if you like; it was not a subject they felt intimidated by and, very often, because you get to know people and you discuss things with them, people would go on to do other subjects they might not have felt able to do. In that sense it was very positive. It seems to me that no—what I would call—proper reason has been given for closing the class.

Mrs Dean

  124. Going back, are there problems with other subjects? Do you foresee changes in the way you are able to teach other subjects in the future?
  (Ms Fletcher) Yes, I do foresee problems. One of the problems is that the Home Office only monitors results in literacy and numeracy. None of the other subjects, although they are accredited by Blantyre, are seen as having educational value, and I have been told that the wide range of classes that we run—ie, art, pottery, woodwork, decorative painting techniques and languages—are all seen as recreational classes with no educational value.

  125. Can I ask you by whom you have been told that?
  (Ms Fletcher) By one of the governors.

Mr Malins

  126. Just arising out the education issue, Ms Fletcher, I think all of us would agree that education is an absolutely vital aspect for all prisons, in that qualities of hope and enthusiasm are essential qualities in prison staff. With that backcloth, has it ever been said to you about Blantyre prisoners that "these men are all beyond redemption"?
  (Ms Fletcher) Yes, it has.

  127. Who said that?
  (Ms Fletcher) Mr Murtagh.

  128. The Area Manager?
  (Ms Fletcher) Yes.

Mr Winnick

  129. Can you tell us when he said that?
  (Ms Fletcher) He said that on 5 July.

  130. In what context? It seems odd that suddenly, out of nowhere, he should make such a comment.
  (Ms Fletcher) We had, on that day, a visit from Mr Paul Boateng.

Chairman

  131. The Minister of State at the Home Office.
  (Ms Fletcher) Mr Boateng spent quite a long time in education. Also, his visit took place after the classes had finished. Therefore, he did not have a chance to see the students or to see classes in action. But he did spend a lot of time in education and was very interested in the fact that the education department at Blantyre is unique and offers a lot more classes than normal education departments would in a normal prison. Mr Boateng came to visit and when he came around the department he had Mr Bartlett, Mr Spratling and Mr Murtagh with him. After he had gone I was called to Mr Bartlett's office and Mr Murtagh was there. He wanted to discuss the visit, and I actually brought up the photography class again, as I did not want to give that one up very easily, and my other concerns about the education department. I brought up—with the photography class in mind—the subject of trust and the men. He told me that they were not to be trusted because they were all beyond redemption.

Mr Winnick

  132. What is your view?
  (Ms Fletcher) I disagree strongly with this.

  133. Did you tell him that?
  (Ms Fletcher) Yes, I did.

  134. Or was it difficult to do so?
  (Ms Fletcher) I did tell him that and we disagreed. Because I have not got a prison background and because I have only been in this employment for a short while, I was told I was naive.

  135. Were you shocked that someone in such a senior position in the Prison Service should make what many believe to be a somewhat outrageous remark?
  (Ms Fletcher) I was, particularly as when I first came to Blantyre (I live locally and I had heard of Blantyre) I did not quite believe that this regime was as good as it was. It was very simple, and the simple rules were: no alcohol, no drugs, no violence, and the men were given trust and they were given respect. There was a very strong message coming from the Governor, and our Head of inmate activities who was responsible for education. It answered all my beliefs on how people should be treated. I felt, at the end of a sentence, this is how men should be treated; respect given and trust given was being paid back ten-fold.

  136. What would you say, Ms Fletcher, if it was said that the person who made the remark has had many, many years of experience in the Prison Service; you have not, you might be naive and he understands human nature better? What would be your response to that, with your experience at this institution?
  (Ms Fletcher) With my experience at this institution I would say that he was wrong because, yes, perhaps this is the view of somebody who has seen other prisons, but Blantyre is unique, and the ethos at Blantyre was unique. I would say that it is the view of somebody who fails to understand what the ethos was here and, also, who fails really to understand human nature.

Mr Stinchcombe

  137. Mr Duff, what kind of facilities did you have, or do you have at the moment, in Blantyre to run your photography class?
  (Mr Duff) I had better give you the history of it. It started off as an activity day or during activity week, where people are brought in to teach subjects that are not normally provided here to stimulate interest in things. Anyway, I came in to do a day on photography and it was so well-received that I was contacted by the education manager and asked to come in one day a week to do this as a subject. At first it was not accredited, it was more like a camera club, and then after a couple of years I wrote a programme and had it accredited at the Open College Network at three levels. In the early days we used to use a room that was also used for decorative paints and before I started class we had to blank all the windows off, and it was very tedious. We did that for years and years and years, and then in the last couple of years I finally got a room. It is very, very small (it is a little dark room, about 8 feet by 3 feet) with an enlarger in it, and then a little tiny room next to that where I keep all the paperwork.

  138. So two rooms?
  (Mr Duff) Yes, two very small rooms.

  139. What did those rooms look like after the raid?
  (Mr Duff) There is a little cupboard in the dark room, and the door of that was literally ripped open and the lock broken. In that I had work that was waiting for verification—several level 3 folders and quite a few level ones. They were thrown all over the floor.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 16 November 2000