Select Committee on Home Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 180 - 199)

TUESDAY 17 OCTOBER 2000

MR CHRIS JOHNSON, MR K R FORRESTER, MR JOHN DELANEY, MR NICHOLAS BERTRAM, MR J R ILLINGWORTH AND MR CHARLES DARNELL

  180.—and especially the former governor, who really put the thing the other way around, and was arguing the case that you actually do not need that level of security because the thing works on trust which is a two-way street.
  (Mr Delaney) But you need to be a character in the business of management. You cannot tell somebody what to do as easily as you can in the Army, and here you are in an army. He ran it like a business and put the trust in them because people are going out of the gate and there has to be trust, otherwise for example five or six people have disappeared since these new people whereas there was a maximum of four, as I understand it, in the previous four years. In the last three months, we have had four absconded and one escape from here.

  181. I think Jim Semple, the first governor, made the point that it really needed a separate set of rules for establishments like this because they do not neatly fit into the normal run of Category C prisons. Perhaps every prison at this stage of a prisoner's sentence ought to have a resettlement function, it would make far more sense, but that is not the answer, is it?
  (Mr Bertram) The lad who just went over the fence recently was positive for an opiate MDT, so there is empirical evidence rather than just taking people's word for it.
  (Mr Johnson) And he came after the raid.
  (Mr Bertram) That is right. They are getting here now and they are simply not unpacking that closed mentality, which is what happened under Eoin and the other governors; they got out of that mentality and got into doing their best here, getting a job, getting out from here, staying out of trouble. That broke the recidivism rate and that is what it should be about. Prison does not work but Blantyre House did. There are no more victims now. There is a lot of anecdotal evidence here, people come in to teach pottery, to play football, these are people who did not return to crime. There are no more victims in that chain of events for them. That is what this place is about and it should be about, but if it is allowed to continue the way it is going, you are going to have a recidivism rate the same as all the others.

  182. The impression you and your colleagues have given us all day is that you are very pessimistic about this getting back on track.
  (Mr Johnson) There is a definite feeling that they are destroying this place by stealth. The type of people who are coming here now are not what they were 12 months ago. It is interesting what Martin Narey said, I suppose he is insinuating that the career criminal used to come here.

Mr Winnick

  183. What you are saying, in effect, is that the prisoners who are coming here now under the new management are those who are likely to be the sort of people who will not—
  (Mr Johnson)—take up the opportunities.

  184.—take up the sort of policy which has been in this institution for some time?
  (Mr Johnson) They will not give a monkey's if they are back at Maidstone tomorrow.

  185. So it is a deliberate policy?
  (Mr Illingworth) I feel that yes, very strongly.
  (Mr Johnson) They have the lowest roll count for four years.
  (Mr Darnell) We have been told by senior staff members, who shall remain nameless today, that they have been told that the selection criteria no longer applies for Blantyre. Go and get anybody. Don't be selective any more. Take who you can take. The purpose, we believe, is that the raid failed to destroy Blantyre, they are now going to destroy it from inside. People will not only not adhere to Blantyre's ethos, they will disrupt the ethos even further.
  (Mr Johnson) Security is paramount in their mind now. Almost 70 per cent of us here are D Cats, low risk.

  186. The prison officers were saying that they suspected, because of doubts about what is going on here, there are fewer prisoners applying to come here.
  (Mr Johnson) There is a question mark over Blantyre, of course there is. If it is not resolved quickly, we will lose Blantyre forever.
  (Mr Illingworth) I feel this was the jewel in the Prison Service's crown. For some reason they want to bring it down. I just cannot work it out, as I put in my letter to you. When I sent that letter I felt, from when I first started out, I have had the "hang `em and flog `em" mentality of prison officers, and when I came here it was just enlightened to have the governor sit down and ask you what your goals were and how to achieve them and to instil that trust, when in the last two and a half years I had me walking behind a prison officer opening gates and shutting them to allow me to walk around.

  187. Is it the case that very often somebody would come and sit in the canteen and you did not know he was the governor?
  (Mr Illingworth) Yes.
  (Mr Delaney) He would come and sit and have his lunch with you.

  188. Do this lot do it?
  (Mr Delaney) No. I have not even met or seen whatever his name is—Chris Bartlett.

Mr Cawsey

  189. Reading your written submission, you were in a position where you had a good position with the guarantee of a well-paid job when you reach parole very shortly, and when Mr Bartlett took that position away you have written to him and you have had no response or chance to speak to him?
  (Mr Delaney) I not only wrote to him, the company not only wrote to him, they also wrote and told him they would give me—as thank God they still are—that job when I am released. The governor did not just not reply, he did not have the courtesy to acknowledge receipt of the letters. How will we know, when I was given a letter to say, "There is nothing wrong with your job, we are just not giving it to you any more"? That is not what you do in any walk of life, I would not have thought. If I may just take a few minutes of your time—this is not about me—this is something that somebody gave me today which really sums up this problem. This is a lifer here called Michael Leggs (sic) and he was working successfully with a very large public company called ANC. I have actually photostated this because I thought you might be interested. They were asking for a reference on him. It says, "Michael has been employed with this company for some considerable time in the capacity of warehouse supervisor. He is an integral member of our team, working in a busy but friendly environment. His role is to initially supervise that all parcels have been efficiently despatched ....", et cetera, et cetera. "The role that Michael plays demands honesty and utmost trustworthiness as he handles upwards of £500,000,000 parcels daily. He has the keys to our building and full knowledge of our alarm systems which may indicate to the board ...", that is the Parole Board, "... our faith in his integrity. ANC has been recruiting rehabilitating prisoners from Blantyre House for several years and we have a 100 per cent track record in the results produced by these men. I am a qualified stress consultant ...", the man who wrote this, "... and therefore able to offer counselling services to these inmates when they feel the need to speak about their circumstances although we always respect their privacy. It has been our experience that all our employees on life terms are, without exception, extremely remorseful as their cases are usually domestic and we also find them sadly lacking in self-confidence coupled with guilt that society is looking down on them. We try in our humble way to restore these men's faith in themselves by offering them back their self-respect and making them welcome as part of our team. Michael was a classic example of this type of inmate. His remorse was not only for his original perpetration, but also for the fact that he did not handle his original parole well, and now having matured mentally, lives for the opportunity to rejoin society where he can live out his remaining years ....", et cetera et cetera. "As his family is domiciled in Harlow, Essex, we have arranged that a sister depot in that area would accept him on transfer ...". That was what he was working as. I do not know the exact dates but after this new regime came in, they gave him notice to quit this job. He carried on for two days and then had a heart attack, he says because of the stress of losing the job. All his previous life he has worked in transportation. You can see they thought highly of him, he thought highly of the job, this place took it away from him.

Chairman

  190. Was he told why?
  (Mr Delaney) No, according to him, he was not told why. He had insurance on his motorcar and he had put Blantyre House, not HMP—you know about insurance.

  191. Yes.
  (Mr Delaney) The insurance company concerned said they knew it was a prison because they only look up the PO numbers, so they know it is a prison, and it is of no concern, it is still insured, the company still insures his car. That was why they said he cannot drive but he actually carried on going to that job by train, then they stopped it.

  192. Whereabouts was he working?
  (Mr Delaney) Tonbridge or Tunbridge Wells—Tunbridge Wells. He has no employment, he does not get unemployment benefit because he is a serving prisoner, that I would have thought has not done him a great deal of good.

  193. Can you let us have a copy of that?
  (Mr Delaney) I have done copies.

  194. Is he still here?
  (Mr Delaney) He is still here.

  195. Is he better?
  (Mr Johnson) No, he is not well. He is a worrier, obviously.

  196. When is he due to get parole?
  (Mr Bertram) He is waiting to get it at the moment.
  (Mr Delaney) He should be getting it within months. He has been in prison many, many, many years.

  197. How long does that Parole Board take, as a matter of interest?
  (Mr Bertram) It used to take over a year but they have now implemented a fast stream system which takes six months, but most of us here have been waiting eight, ten months.

  198. Is that something we might look at, do you think?
  (Mr Bertram) The lifer system? You will have a problem. The lifers here cannot work a full week. At the moment I have to fiddle my job, take time off on sick, et cetera, just so I can get a day to go on my town visit. The fixed termers can work six days, or they have six days temporary release, which is five days working and one day to go home with the family. The maximum you can get, which you can only get in the last two months of your sentence, is five days as a lifer. You start off with three, then you get four, then five, but these are people, like myself, who have been in the best part of 20 years and they are the people who most need to get a full-time job. Before I got stuffed into Unipart, I was a team leader on the railways, responsible for a dozen men. I can produce equally glowing references from my previous employer. This was up in London. All they want is for you to be placed next door to Blantyre House so they can nip out and check you are there. The trust has all gone completely. Although trust is not tangible, you cannot weigh it, you cannot measure it, the 5th May shows there was not that kind of abuse here. If you raided a local junior school, I would hate to see what you would find in the lockers there. A bit of cannabis, some credit cards and a mobile phone.

  199. The story was, as you all know, that the intelligence was so worrying—awash with drugs and criminal activities—
  (Mr Johnson) Do you know where the intelligence came from?


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 16 November 2000