Select Committee on Home Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 440 - 459)

WEDNESDAY 18 OCTOBER 2000

RT HON PAUL BOATENG, MP, MR MARTIN NAREY, MR JOHN PODMORE AND MR TOM MURTAGH

  440. You may recall that in the document you said that in paragraph two, "Chris Bartlett was appointed as the new Governor of Blantyre House. Mr Bartlett's first action as the new Governor was to request a full search of the establishment and have every prisoner drug tested." You said, "I accepted Mr Bartlett's request."
  (Mr Murtagh) That is correct.

  441. Is that not somewhat disingenuous? We were told just yesterday, in answer to my question to Mr Bartlett, that you only approached him on 3rd May, two days before the raid. He knew absolutely nothing about his promotion and you only approached him two days beforehand, and suddenly he should come up with a request for this draconian search, and that you had requested this request. You had been planning this thing for weeks, had you not?
  (Mr Murtagh) The search was authorised on 28th April and the request was a formality from the Governor. Having taken charge of the prison he then formally asked for us to carry out the search, which was already planned, which he, as the Governor, had to formally approve, and which he did.

  442. You had been planning this for weeks, had you not?
  (Mr Murtagh) No, we had not been planning it for weeks. We began planning it on the weekend prior, it was the Bank holiday weekend. It was given formal approval on 28th April, if I remember, and I briefed Mr Podmore to begin planning the search over the Bank holiday weekend.

  443. When did you first discuss this with your so called Chaucer team, that conditions in Blantyre House were such that it warranted this kind of SAS style raid?

  (Mr Murtagh) I did not actually discuss it with my Chaucer team. The Chaucer team are a support group who are investigators. They report to us, but I did not discuss it with them at all, I discussed it with my superiors.

  444. In your report you refer to initial planning meetings. When did they take place?
  (Mr Murtagh) Can you repeat that?

  445. You said, "I also attended the initial planning meetings to provide advice based on my experience of similar operations in the past."
  (Mr Murtagh) That is correct.

  446. When did they take place?
  (Mr Murtagh) I attended the meeting at Rochester. That was on the Wednesday prior to the search.

  447. That is the 3rd.
  (Mr Murtagh) The 3rd or the 4th, I think.

  448. Is this before or after you had advised Mr Bartlett of his exciting new appointment?
  (Mr Murtagh) It was on the same day. He attended the meeting.

  449. Was it before or after?
  (Mr Murtagh) I am sorry?

  450. Was it before or after?
  (Mr Murtagh) It was after I had told him.

  451. You told him in the morning, "I've got this exciting new job for you. You have got a briefing. The first thing we are going to do is go and raid the place, because I was authorised by the Director General on 28th April to do this."
  (Mr Murtagh) I did not refer to it as a raid, I briefed him that he was to take over as governor and I invited him to the meeting where he became aware of what was planned. That was all the detail that was given to him at the time. He understood that it was a confidential matter at that stage.

  452. Can I move to the actual promotion of Mr McLennan-Murray from being a governor of a prison to being a deputy governor of a prison, which I am told was a promotion? In answer to questions taken in the House of Lords by Lord Mayhew, the former Member of Parliament for the area, Lord Bassam said, "Mr McLennan-Murray's career move to a different type of prison had been planned for some time." Is it normal for the area manager to serve a notice on a colleague that he is to be moved forthwith?
  (Mr Murtagh) It does happen.

  453. That is a planned career move, just to say, "You are out this afternoon"?
  (Mr Murtagh) I did not plan his career move. I was merely the courier of a letter from somebody else. I did not decide when he was to move or where he was to move to.

  454. Who did?
  (Mr Murtagh) That decision was made by the Director General.

  455. On whose advice?
  (Mr Murtagh) I did discuss it with him.

  456. I think you will find that in the evidence that the Director General gave us it was upon your own advice, Mr Murtagh. So you were not a by-stander in this.
  (Mr Murtagh) I am sorry, I did indicate that I was quite happy to have Mr McLennan-Murray as part of my team in the area.
  (Mr Narey) Mr Corbett, can I clarify this particular line of enquiry?

Chairman

  457. If you can help, sure.
  (Mr Narey) Mr Howarth, I take every decision on the appointments. I take all those decisions personally, each and every one. I take them, generally, on advice from the area manager and personnel department. I had decided to move Eoin on from that post some months previously. He had been there for four years and he was ready for a move. Indeed, there were one or two jobs he had personally applied for. So the decision to move Eoin and where he was to be moved to—although I later, on appeal from Eoin, revised that—was taken by me on advice from Mr Murtagh and by personnel.

Mr Winnick

  458. To being a deputy governor of Swaleside?
  (Mr Narey) That is correct.

  459. The Governor of that particular prison was the very person who was given responsibility in carrying out the search on 5th and 6th May, John Podmore.
  (Mr Narey) No. The person who carried out that search, Mr Podmore—who is here today—had been the Governor of that prison. He had already left that prison, or was in the process of leaving, and Eoin would have moved to Swaleside to work with a completely new governor who had just moved into that post.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 16 November 2000