Select Committee on Home Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 620 - 639)

WEDNESDAY 18 OCTOBER 2000

RT HON PAUL BOATENG, MP, MR MARTIN NAREY, MR JOHN PODMORE AND MR TOM MURTAGH

  620. What was the justification for that? Did you know about this?
  (Mr Podmore) No. I would like to answer the allegation you are putting before me. I have said already that as part of the team for the search I had someone by the name of Alan Shipton who used to work there. Also on the ground throughout a significant part of the night was the new Governor.

  621. He did not know the place, he was brand new.
  (Mr Podmore) Also on the ground was Brian Pollet, who had been the Governor there for some considerable period of time. Also, I had with me the head of the National Dog Team, a man with, as I have said already, great experience and integrity. Now I needed and I wanted those senior people around, walking about, talking, supervising all the things which were going on. Towards the end of the evening I went into the establishment myself. Throughout the key part of the evening there were also members of the Board of Visitors. I am as saddened as anyone else that they did not choose to stay on. Now I did not see what you are describing to me. Neither was any such scene described to me by any of those key senior people that I had on the ground, precisely to supervise the activities which were carried out.

Mr Winnick

  622. You justify everything that happened? You have no regrets about any incident which occurred on the night of 5/6?
  (Mr Podmore) I have not said that. I regret very much that it was necessary to force entry into certain rooms.

Mr Howarth

  623. Was it necessary to damage prisoners' work? What sort of example does that send to the prisoner about respect for other people's property?
  (Mr Podmore) Firstly, the initial reference you made to the prisoner's work was I believe a file of photographs that was part of the course work for that particular prisoner. That was removed and I believe—and I may stand corrected—it has been subsequently returned. The allegation that other work was damaged, destroyed and thrown around the place, I am afraid I have to refute.

Chairman

  624. Mr Podmore, you cannot simply refute it. Is he lying to us? Is that instructor lying to us? Why would he make that up?
  (Mr Podmore) No. I am saying that when we left I was adamant that we checked things, that we looked around, that we made sure that as far as possible—yes, okay, doors had been damaged—that sort of thing had not taken place and did not take place.

  625. Let us try this another way. If that is as it is alleged, would you still defend that?
  (Mr Podmore) Of course not.

  626. Right.
  (Mr Podmore) Of course not. If it did happen, and I cannot account for the action of every single member of staff who was under my command that night, if it did happen, and it was one of them, then I am responsible, I have no problem with that.

Mr Cawsey

  627. I am still trying to get to the end of my Chaplain's questions. We always seem to get off that subject. When I visited the Chaplain's office yesterday and spoke to the Chaplain, he told me about his key, as far as he was concerned, being readily available. He wanted to show me, also, that the team broke down the door to gain entry but then left untouched a large locked cabinet. Now we have spoken about there being a clear strategy for this search. What strategy has the idea that you break down the door to gain access to an area and then leave a large cabinet locked and untouched?
  (Mr Podmore) Can I help you by explaining to you the way in which A&E dogs and drug dogs work? They are able to detect the presence of whatever substance they are trained to detect in a cupboard. So breaking open a cupboard if it is not readily accessible is not necessary.

Mr Stinchcombe

  628. You were looking for money in the Chaplain's office amongst other things. You took 120 odd quid out. Why not open the cupboard as well?
  (Mr Podmore) No. May I refer back to the overall strategy of the search which I alluded to earlier which was to check the non prisoner areas via the use of A&E dogs and drug dogs for those substances. Now if they came across cash in that context then it was quite appropriate for them to remove that cash.

Mr Winnick

  629. The Chaplain was not hiding any drugs?
  (Mr Podmore) As far as I am aware there were no indications by the drug dogs—

  Mr Winnick: That surprises me a great deal, Mr Podmore!

Mr Cawsey

  630. Was this an intelligence driven, briefed search of Blantyre House or was it a fishing expedition?
  (Mr Podmore) I would not describe it as a fishing expedition.

  631. You would not describe it as a fishing expedition. You have obviously done these sorts of searches before at institutions other than Blantyre House. If we go through what has been found, we have a small amount of cannabis, so small the Director General cannot quantify it. We have a small number of ecstasy tablets. We have what the Director General says is a considerable quantity of pornography, it was actually seven items, in a 120 man prison. Compared with other searches you have done, would you say this was a considerable amount of contraband and the like, in your experience?
  (Mr Podmore) I have recently visited Kirklevington as part of the Chief Inspector's recent inspection and I would have to say, having spent a week in Kirklevington walking around, talking to prisoners, talking to staff, that I would not have expected to find the same amount of material in Kirklevington Grange.

  632. I did not ask about Kirklevington Grange, I asked from your experience, which you have got in other prison institutions, would you say what you found in those searches would be higher or less?
  (Mr Podmore) My main experience was searching in places like Belmarsh, which is a very high security prison. So it is not unreasonable to draw a comparison with other sorts of establishments. The comparison I would attempt to draw would be with a similar type of establishment.

  633. But in a high security prison you might say that drugs would be even tighter to get through. If there was only a small amount of cannabis and a couple of ecstasy tablets, I am asking you whether that is a good catch from your perspective or whether it can be regarded as a very small amount compared with other prisons you have actually searched?
  (Mr Podmore) It is a small amount of drugs, that is clearly obvious. As the Director General said, if the ecstasy tablets were not for use within the establishment where were they for use? I have to say, I do not know whether you have looked at the profile of the prisoners. It has been mentioned already that they were drug free when they got there so it seems unlikely that Blantyre was housing hard drug users in any event.

  634. Why the search then?
  (Mr Podmore) The search was for a range of things, anything from drugs, ammunition and explosives, through to relatively mundane things like—

  Mr Malins: Spirit levels.

Mr Cawsey

  635. Spirit levels and pornographic photographs.
  (Mr Podmore) Can I address the point about the builder's tools. We seem to have lost sight of the fact that this prison houses I believe 20 lifers?
  (Mr Narey) 20 lifers, yes.
  (Mr Podmore) One of whom is serving a long sentence, albeit a long time ago, for the murder of a police inspector.

Chairman

  636. Finishing a sentence.
  (Mr Podmore) Indeed. There are still 20 lifers in that establishment.

Mr Cawsey

  637. Mr Podmore, you have just said that this search was for drugs, ammunition and explosives. So we know you have got virtually no drugs. What ammunition and explosives were there?
  (Mr Podmore) I have said, the brief was to look for anything from the range at one extreme of drugs and ammunition and explosives across the spectrum. I did not know what we would find.

  638. It is a fishing expedition. Let me finish, Mr Podmore. At the end of the search, do you have a de-brief of your officers?
  (Mr Podmore) Yes.

  639. Of the officers who took part in that, what were their comments about what they found?
  (Mr Podmore) The main comment I got from the staff who I spoke to was the quantity of belongings in cells.

  Mr Cawsey: Nothing to do with drugs or ammunition or explosives.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 16 November 2000